; The IESG
Asunto: Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01
Hi Lars,
I saw your comment and have to chime in.
I have to respectfully disagree with your assessment: "Overall, I remain
unconvinced that there is sufficient work/interest in this space to warrant a
chartered WG." I am not sure if
> *From:* Y. Richard Yang
> *Date:* 2021-08-24 22:42
> *To:* Lars Eggert
> *CC:* IETF ALTO ; alto-cha...@ietf.org; Qin Wu
> ; The IESG
> *Subject:* Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01
> Hi Lars,
>
> I saw your comment and have to chime in.
>
> I have to respectfully d
: IETF ALTO; alto-cha...@ietf.org; Qin Wu; The IESG
Subject: Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01
Hi Lars,
I saw your comment and have to chime in.
I have to respectfully disagree with your assessment: "Overall, I remain
unconvinced that there is sufficient work/interest in this
Thank Ben for additional comment, see clarification below.
>o Support for modern transport protocols. ALTO only uses the
>capabilities of HTTP version 1. Since then, the IETF has developed
>HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. The working group will develop any necessary
>protocol extensions and
Hi Lars,
I saw your comment and have to chime in.
I have to respectfully disagree with your assessment: "Overall, I remain
unconvinced that there is sufficient work/interest in this space to warrant
a chartered WG." I am not sure if you attended the NAI@SIGCOMM'21 Workshop
yesterday. There was
Hi,
On 2021-8-24, at 16:07, Qin Wu wrote:
> Thank you for reviewing the proposed re-charter of the ALTO working group.
> Obviously your opinions are very important as a Transport expert, but it is
> disappointing that you have made such a strong objection so late in the
> process and after the
