Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01

2021-09-06 Thread LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
; The IESG Asunto: Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01 Hi Lars, I saw your comment and have to chime in. I have to respectfully disagree with your assessment: "Overall, I remain unconvinced that there is sufficient work/interest in this space to warrant a chartered WG." I am not sure if

Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01

2021-08-27 Thread Martin Duke
> *From:* Y. Richard Yang > *Date:* 2021-08-24 22:42 > *To:* Lars Eggert > *CC:* IETF ALTO ; alto-cha...@ietf.org; Qin Wu > ; The IESG > *Subject:* Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01 > Hi Lars, > > I saw your comment and have to chime in. > > I have to respectfully d

Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01

2021-08-26 Thread Peng Liu
: IETF ALTO; alto-cha...@ietf.org; Qin Wu; The IESG Subject: Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01 Hi Lars, I saw your comment and have to chime in. I have to respectfully disagree with your assessment: "Overall, I remain unconvinced that there is sufficient work/interest in this

[alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01: (with COMMENT)

2021-08-26 Thread Qin Wu
Thank Ben for additional comment, see clarification below. >o Support for modern transport protocols. ALTO only uses the >capabilities of HTTP version 1. Since then, the IETF has developed >HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. The working group will develop any necessary >protocol extensions and

Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01

2021-08-24 Thread Y. Richard Yang
Hi Lars, I saw your comment and have to chime in. I have to respectfully disagree with your assessment: "Overall, I remain unconvinced that there is sufficient work/interest in this space to warrant a chartered WG." I am not sure if you attended the NAI@SIGCOMM'21 Workshop yesterday. There was

Re: [alto] charter-ietf-alto-04-01

2021-08-24 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, On 2021-8-24, at 16:07, Qin Wu wrote: > Thank you for reviewing the proposed re-charter of the ALTO working group. > Obviously your opinions are very important as a Transport expert, but it is > disappointing that you have made such a strong objection so late in the > process and after the