Thank George... I don't know how to understand. The content of amanda.debug:
amandad: debug 1 pid 7562 ruid 11 euid 11 start time Wed May 2 15:29:01
2001
./amandad: version 2.4.1p1
./amandad: build: VERSION="Amanda-2.4.1p1"
./amandad:BUILT_DATE="Sun Oct 29 17:03:58 EST 2000"
./amandad:
Hello folks... I need some help. I`m configuring Amanda on a server running
linux kernel 2.2.17. I have a SCSI device and tapetype DDS-3 Sony. When I
check the configuration with amcheck I got the following:
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
NOTE: skip
Hello folks... I need some help. I`m configuring
Amanda on a server running linux kernel 2.2.17. I have a SCSI device and
tapetype DDS-3 Sony. When I check the configuration with amcheck I got the
following:
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
NOTE
>Is the actual (eg, tar) command used by amdump recorded? Where?
/tmp/amanda/sendsize*debug and /tmp/amanda/sendbackup*debug on the client.
>george
John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"John R. Jackson" wrote:
>
> >But I just archived that dir to disk using tar and it got all the files
> >fine.
>
> And did you do it the same way Amanda does, i.e. with all the listed
> incremental type flags it hands to GNU tar? That's where a lot of the
> problems are, not in just basic tar o
>John, here is a sample of the right index files, with the big
>numbers you were talking about, I guess:
>
>07274015541/./
Yup. Those are the evil ones.
>setting up gnutar 1.13.19 on both my server & clients seems to
>have solved the problem, that is, amrecover not showing all the
>backed up
>But I just archived that dir to disk using tar and it got all the files
>fine.
And did you do it the same way Amanda does, i.e. with all the listed
incremental type flags it hands to GNU tar? That's where a lot of the
problems are, not in just basic tar operations.
>I downgraded my (gnu) tar
"John R. Jackson" wrote:
>
> >here is a sample of the gnutar list for 1.13 (looks bad) :
> >
> >2555905 43008 ./kretzsch/mail/communication_OBS
> >2555905 40960 ./kretzsch/mail/SOHO-news
>
> That's the wrong file. I'm talking about the index files. Those look
> like the incremental list file.
"John R. Jackson" wrote:
> >But i have a question as to why, according to a tar on the tape afterwards,
> >only four out of the nine items in the directory to dump were actually
> >backed up. ...
>
> What version of GNU tar are you using? If it's not at least 1.13.17
> (and probably 1.13.19 wo
* John R. Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Fri, May 04, 2001 at 08:39:24PM -0500)
> >Ideally amanda should look every time a chunk is written to disk how much
> >space ios free ...
>
> That's probably a good idea. I've added it to the TODO list.
thanks
10 matches
Mail list logo