--- Begin Message ---
HI,
I am running amcheck on my backup called Daily and I am getting the
following output:
Amanda Tape Server Host Check
-
ERROR: tapelist dir /usr/local/share/amanda/Daily: not writable
Holding disk /amanda: 404144 KB disk space available, th
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 08:26 AM, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:02:54PM +0100, Niall O Broin wrote:
>> I asked about this the other day and it transpired that I didn't have
>> record
>> yes in my dumptype, so that explained that, or so I thought. However,
>> I now
--On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 13:23:08 -0700 John Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can those with experience with changers elucidate some details for me?
>
> What is the AMANDA/amtape policy when "rolling over" from the last
> tape to the first tape in my "Backup Set"? My config specifies the
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 06:31:10PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Our shop runs a small number of development systems with compilers, and a
> larger number of machines on which I will want to install the client only.
> Furthermore none of the development machines are the backup server.
>
> Wha
Can those with experience with changers elucidate some details for me?
What is the AMANDA/amtape policy when "rolling over" from the last
tape to the first tape in my "Backup Set"? My config specifies the
following:
dumpcycle 2 weeks
runspercycle 5
tapecycle 10 tapes
In my changer
I decided to start using tar for a particular machine but received the
following for one of the file systems (the rest of the machine backed up
without problems):
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
utnetdb.gw /usr lev 0 FAILED [/usr/local/bin/tar returned 2]
/-- utnetdb.gw /usr lev 0 FAILED [/
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 1:44pm, Terri Eads wrote
> I don't have a /tmp/amanda/runtar*debug file. Do I have to already be
> running tar to generate this file?
Yes.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
>
> * Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:06:51PM -0400)
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 11:40am, Terri Eads wrote
> >
> > > I see this in the amanda.conf file:
> > >
> > > # Note that the `full pathname' of a file within its
> > > # fi
* Joshua Baker-LePain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:06:51PM -0400)
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 11:40am, Terri Eads wrote
>
> > I see this in the amanda.conf file:
> >
> > # Note that the `full pathname' of a file within its
> > # filesystem starts with `./', because of the wa
Various people
>>> I found one posting dealing with how to use it -- it contains a modified
>>> sendsize.c that it seems like you plop into place and recompile:\
>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-users&m=9253924842&w=2
>> I think this sendsize.c was maybe for amanda2.4.2p2 as I go
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 11:40am, Terri Eads wrote
> I see this in the amanda.conf file:
>
> # Note that the `full pathname' of a file within its
> # filesystem starts with `./', because of the way amanda runs
> # gnutar: `tar -C $mountpoint -cf - --lots-of-options .'
>
> I was w
I see this in the amanda.conf file:
# Note that the `full pathname' of a file within its
# filesystem starts with `./', because of the way amanda runs
# gnutar: `tar -C $mountpoint -cf - --lots-of-options .'
I was wondering how I can find out what the "lots-of-options" are?
T
Solaris 8 does.
Thomas Hepper wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
Hi,On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 03:35:34PM +0200, Ryszard Kluza wrote:
HelloI have Sun E250 with Solaris 7Tape library Adic FastStore22And amandaHow I have to configure amanda and solaris to work together,What kind of driver I
On 24 Apr 2002, at 14:20, David Flood wrote:
> On 24 Apr 2002, at 9:10, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
>
> > > 1. Is there a version of sendsize.c that is compatibile with amanda
> > > 2.4.3b3?
> >
> > I don't know that there's a modified sendsize.c for 2.4.3. *However*, is
> > there a r
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:02:54PM +0100, Niall O Broin wrote:
> I asked about this the other day and it transpired that I didn't have record
> yes in my dumptype, so that explained that, or so I thought. However, I now
> do have record yes in my global dumptype but still level 1 dumps are of the
That solved the problem
Thank you for your help.
-mike
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 3:17pm, Michael Hall wrote
>
>
>>Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
>>
>>ERROR: bzncs03: [could not access sda1 (sda1): No such file or directory]
>>Client c
On 24 Apr 2002, at 9:10, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> > 1. Is there a version of sendsize.c that is compatibile with amanda
> > 2.4.3b3?
>
> I don't know that there's a modified sendsize.c for 2.4.3. *However*, is
> there a reason you need 2.4.3b3? You realize 'b' is for beta, right?
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 2:03pm, David Flood wrote
> On 23 Apr 2002, at 9:37, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
> > I found one posting dealing with how to use it -- it contains a modified
> > sendsize.c that it seems like you plop into place and recompile:\
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=am
On 23 Apr 2002, at 9:37, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> I found one posting dealing with how to use it -- it contains a modified
> sendsize.c that it seems like you plop into place and recompile:\
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-users&m=9253924842&w=2
I think this sendsize.c was m
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 1:12pm, GIC MLs wrote
> A couple of questions from my log file:
>
> planner:RDEV_PREFIX="/dev/r" DUMP="/sbin/dump"
> planner:RESTORE="/sbin/restore" GNUTAR="/usr/bin/tar"
>
> Should I be using gtar instead?
Yes -- you *must* use GNU tar. But, depending u
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 3:17pm, Michael Hall wrote
> Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
>
> ERROR: bzncs03: [could not access sda1 (sda1): No such file or directory]
> Client check: 2 hosts checked in 0.046 seconds, 1 problem found
>
> (brought to you by Amanda 2.4.
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 12:02pm, Niall O Broin wrote
> I asked about this the other day and it transpired that I didn't have record
> yes in my dumptype, so that explained that, or so I thought. However, I now
> do have record yes in my global dumptype but still level 1 dumps are of the
> full fil
On 23/04 2002 17:38 Frank Smith wrote:
> --On Tuesday, April 23, 2002 15:26:33 +0200 Toralf Lund
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 23/04 2002 14:52 Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
>
>> Yes, maybe a good decision. (Although the purchase of new tapes and the
>> management of all of them do add up
I asked about this the other day and it transpired that I didn't have record
yes in my dumptype, so that explained that, or so I thought. However, I now
do have record yes in my global dumptype but still level 1 dumps are of the
full filesystems. amadmin TIZ find no gives me this list of backups
Hi,
I have just installed amanda and run it up and I have to say I'm really
impressed. But you all know it's good, so I won't go on.
One thing I have noticed, though, does not appear to be covered in the docs.
Our shop runs a small number of development systems with compilers, and a
larger numb
I was out of pocket for 2 weeks, doing the Grand Old Man scene at
a sister station, and when I got back I grabbed 2.4.3b3-20020422
and built it without doing my usual edit job on reporter.c to
make its output readable as it seemed reporter.c had been heavily
re-written, according to the Change
26 matches
Mail list logo
