Re: amlabel ftape

2002-04-24 Thread Stefan Kiczerjak
hello johannes, tx for the hint, but it won't work. still the same probs. if you send me the configuration, i will appreciate it. greets stefan

About reporter.c output formatting, was Re: Over large level 1 dumps

2002-04-24 Thread Gene Heskett
I was out of pocket for 2 weeks, doing the Grand Old Man scene at a sister station, and when I got back I grabbed 2.4.3b3-20020422 and built it without doing my usual edit job on reporter.c to make its output readable as it seemed reporter.c had been heavily re-written, according to the

build and install for different machines.

2002-04-24 Thread cmeo
Hi, I have just installed amanda and run it up and I have to say I'm really impressed. But you all know it's good, so I won't go on. One thing I have noticed, though, does not appear to be covered in the docs. Our shop runs a small number of development systems with compilers, and a larger

Over large level 1 dumps

2002-04-24 Thread Niall O Broin
I asked about this the other day and it transpired that I didn't have record yes in my dumptype, so that explained that, or so I thought. However, I now do have record yes in my global dumptype but still level 1 dumps are of the full filesystems. amadmin TIZ find no gives me this list of

Re: What to do when tape is full?

2002-04-24 Thread Toralf Lund
On 23/04 2002 17:38 Frank Smith wrote: --On Tuesday, April 23, 2002 15:26:33 +0200 Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23/04 2002 14:52 Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: Yes, maybe a good decision. (Although the purchase of new tapes and the management of all of them do add up to a

Re: amcheck

2002-04-24 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 3:17pm, Michael Hall wrote Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check ERROR: bzncs03: [could not access sda1 (sda1): No such file or directory] Client check: 2 hosts checked in 0.046 seconds, 1 problem found (brought to you by Amanda 2.4.2p2)

Re: Over large level 1 dumps

2002-04-24 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 12:02pm, Niall O Broin wrote I asked about this the other day and it transpired that I didn't have record yes in my dumptype, so that explained that, or so I thought. However, I now do have record yes in my global dumptype but still level 1 dumps are of the full

Re: Couple of Log File Questions

2002-04-24 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 1:12pm, GIC MLs wrote A couple of questions from my log file: planner:RDEV_PREFIX=/dev/r DUMP=/sbin/dump planner:RESTORE=/sbin/restore GNUTAR=/usr/bin/tar Should I be using gtar instead? Yes -- you *must* use GNU tar. But, depending upon your OS,

Re: Estimates - 7 hour 50mins

2002-04-24 Thread David Flood
On 23 Apr 2002, at 9:37, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: I found one posting dealing with how to use it -- it contains a modified sendsize.c that it seems like you plop into place and recompile:\ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-usersm=9253924842w=2 I think this sendsize.c was maybe

Re: Estimates - 7 hour 50mins

2002-04-24 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 2:03pm, David Flood wrote On 23 Apr 2002, at 9:37, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: I found one posting dealing with how to use it -- it contains a modified sendsize.c that it seems like you plop into place and recompile:\

Re: Estimates - 7 hour 50mins

2002-04-24 Thread David Flood
On 24 Apr 2002, at 9:10, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: 1. Is there a version of sendsize.c that is compatibile with amanda 2.4.3b3? I don't know that there's a modified sendsize.c for 2.4.3. *However*, is there a reason you need 2.4.3b3? You realize 'b' is for beta, right? Yes I

Re: amcheck

2002-04-24 Thread Michael Hall
That solved the problem Thank you for your help. -mike Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 at 3:17pm, Michael Hall wrote Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check ERROR: bzncs03: [could not access sda1 (sda1): No such file or directory] Client check: 2

Re: Over large level 1 dumps

2002-04-24 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:02:54PM +0100, Niall O Broin wrote: I asked about this the other day and it transpired that I didn't have record yes in my dumptype, so that explained that, or so I thought. However, I now do have record yes in my global dumptype but still level 1 dumps are of the

sendsize.c for calcsize

2002-04-24 Thread David Flood
On 24 Apr 2002, at 14:20, David Flood wrote: On 24 Apr 2002, at 9:10, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: 1. Is there a version of sendsize.c that is compatibile with amanda 2.4.3b3? I don't know that there's a modified sendsize.c for 2.4.3. *However*, is there a reason you need

Re: Amanda + solaris

2002-04-24 Thread Don Potter
Solaris 8 does. Thomas Hepper wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Hi,On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 03:35:34PM +0200, Ryszard Kluza wrote: HelloI have Sun E250 with Solaris 7Tape library Adic FastStore22And amandaHow I have to configure amanda and solaris to work together,What kind of driver

gnutar options

2002-04-24 Thread Terri Eads
I see this in the amanda.conf file: # Note that the `full pathname' of a file within its # filesystem starts with `./', because of the way amanda runs # gnutar: `tar -C $mountpoint -cf - --lots-of-options .' I was wondering how I can find out what the lots-of-options are?

Re: gnutar options

2002-04-24 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 11:40am, Terri Eads wrote I see this in the amanda.conf file: # Note that the `full pathname' of a file within its # filesystem starts with `./', because of the way amanda runs # gnutar: `tar -C $mountpoint -cf - --lots-of-options .' I was

Re: Estimates - 7 hour 50mins

2002-04-24 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
Various people I found one posting dealing with how to use it -- it contains a modified sendsize.c that it seems like you plop into place and recompile:\ http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amanda-usersm=9253924842w=2 I think this sendsize.c was maybe for amanda2.4.2p2 as I got errors

Re: gnutar options

2002-04-24 Thread Gerhard den Hollander
* Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:06:51PM -0400) On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 11:40am, Terri Eads wrote I see this in the amanda.conf file: # Note that the `full pathname' of a file within its # filesystem starts with `./', because of the way amanda

Re: gnutar options

2002-04-24 Thread Terri Eads
Gerhard den Hollander wrote: * Joshua Baker-LePain [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 02:06:51PM -0400) On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 11:40am, Terri Eads wrote I see this in the amanda.conf file: # Note that the `full pathname' of a file within its # filesystem starts

Re: gnutar options

2002-04-24 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 at 1:44pm, Terri Eads wrote I don't have a /tmp/amanda/runtar*debug file. Do I have to already be running tar to generate this file? Yes. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University

not really amanda problem: tar, Cannot stat

2002-04-24 Thread Oscar Ricardo Silva
I decided to start using tar for a particular machine but received the following for one of the file systems (the rest of the machine backed up without problems): FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY: utnetdb.gw /usr lev 0 FAILED [/usr/local/bin/tar returned 2] /-- utnetdb.gw /usr lev 0 FAILED

Elaboration on tape changer behavior

2002-04-24 Thread John Koenig
Can those with experience with changers elucidate some details for me? What is the AMANDA/amtape policy when rolling over from the last tape to the first tape in my Backup Set? My config specifies the following: dumpcycle 2 weeks runspercycle 5 tapecycle 10 tapes In my changer

Re: build and install for different machines.

2002-04-24 Thread Mike Delaney
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 06:31:10PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our shop runs a small number of development systems with compilers, and a larger number of machines on which I will want to install the client only. Furthermore none of the development machines are the backup server. What I

Re: Elaboration on tape changer behavior

2002-04-24 Thread Frank Smith
--On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 13:23:08 -0700 John Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can those with experience with changers elucidate some details for me? What is the AMANDA/amtape policy when rolling over from the last tape to the first tape in my Backup Set? My config specifies the

Re: Over large level 1 dumps

2002-04-24 Thread Eric Zylstra
On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 08:26 AM, Dave Sherohman wrote: On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 12:02:54PM +0100, Niall O Broin wrote: I asked about this the other day and it transpired that I didn't have record yes in my dumptype, so that explained that, or so I thought. However, I now do have

[Fwd: amcheck output]

2002-04-24 Thread Trevor Morrison
---BeginMessage--- HI, I am running amcheck on my backup called Daily and I am getting the following output: Amanda Tape Server Host Check - ERROR: tapelist dir /usr/local/share/amanda/Daily: not writable Holding disk /amanda: 404144 KB disk space available,