unsubscribe
Christoph Scheeder wrote:
Hey Christoph (& list),
from my experience the original HP-Colorado-drives do not work reliable
under the newer Linux-kernels. My drives stoped working in the early 2.2.x tree.
:-(
They seemed to backup fine using the scsi-emulation, but restore was
impossible.
Th
Hi all!
> Since your dumper and taper times are always nearly identical you probably
> aren't using a holding disk and are dumping directly to tape. And since
> the rates for one filesystem have remained constant while the other one has
> dropped I would look into possible recent changes on the l
Paul Bijnens wrote:
> Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> >
> > Seems like Oracle likes to create a lot of small ".trc" files over
> > time. The filesystem in question is littered with thousands of them.
> >
> > Once we archived and deleted them, backup performance was back to normal.
> >
> > Would sepa
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 at 3:11pm, Bill Hults wrote
> The tape server's name is bs1 which is where I want to restore the files to.
> I want to restore 2 partitions on fs2.
> The set is DailySet1
> All info for bs1 -
> There is a listing in /var/lib/amanda/DailySet1/curinfo for fs2 but not in
> '../inde
Hello!
Jon H. LaBadie wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 03:04:27PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> >
> > So my question is: does a holding-disk speed up this process? I mean,
> > Amanda will start a dumper on the filesystem that starts filling
> > the holding-disk. At the same time (?) a taper
--On Monday, November 04, 2002 15:04:27 +0100 "Patrick M. Hausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Bijnens wrote:
Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>
> Seems like Oracle likes to create a lot of small ".trc" files over
> time. The filesystem in question is littered with thousands of them.
>
> Once we arc
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 03:55:13PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> But I need a holding disk at least as large as my largest FS to dump?
> So if I have one 170 GB RAID I need one 170 GB holding disk?
No - you need a holding disk preferrably as big as your TWO largest disklist
entries, which may
Hi!
> > > nothing goes from holding disk to tape unless the dump to holding disk
> > > has finished. Then it goes like cat'ting or dd'ing to tape. Small
> > > likelyhood of too slow for tape.
> >
> > Aggreed - cat/dd >/dev/tape will surely be fast enough.
> > But I need a holding disk at least
Hi, I am reletively new to Amanda but I have taken over
responsibility of doing the backups.
I have just created a new configuration to run monthly backups and
the folder contains copies of the files such as amanda.conf from
the other config folder for daily backups.
I have added a new client
>or adding 5 internal 36 GB drives in a RAID 0 configuration as a holding
>disk.
I see that IBM has SCSI disks available up to at least 146G. I'd
recommend plunking in two of those instead so you have room to grow.
After further study of the restore issues I've had with amanda (mostly
tar related) I have just today run into what I feel is another problem
(I suspect is a combination of tar and amanda in this case). I am
concerned with the "incremental" backups. Amanda seems to treat
incrementals as diffe
12 matches
Mail list logo