Re: Solaris ACLs

2004-03-09 Thread Martin Hepworth
Talking of snapshots, FreeBSD 5.x can do this too with the -L flag to dump. Can someone remind me of how to generate a specific backup type (in amanda.conf) that passes the -L flag to dump on the remote system. Ta -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865

mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-09 Thread Kristian Rink
Hi all,... Since people around here still are stuck wanting to have a friday-full/rest-of-the-week-incremental backup strategy, I read through http://www.backupcentral.com/amanda-19.html created two amanda configurations with the same disklist for full and for incremental backup, labeled my

Re: mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-09 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Kristian, on Dienstag, 09. März 2004 at 09:41 you wrote to amanda-users: *** A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED: [label Back06 or new tape not found in rack]. Some dumps may have been left in the holding disk. KR This is strange - tape Back06 actually _is_ inside the changer and KR labeled correctly.

Re: mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-09 Thread Kristian Rink
Hi Stefan, ...and at first, thanks for your reply. On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:02:59 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KR This is strange - tape Back06 actually _is_ inside the changer KR and labeled correctly. Does amcheck run through fine ? Is Back06 in your tapelist?

Re: mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-09 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Kristian, on Dienstag, 09. März 2004 at 10:24 you wrote to amanda-users: At first let me tell you that you should not use localhost in your DLEs. Use the fully qualified hostname (FQDN) instead. localhost bites you at recovery time. KR Okay, thanks for the hint. Anyhow, I am just running

Re: mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-09 Thread Kristian Rink
Hi again,... On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:52:02 +0100 Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: KR Okay, thanks for the hint. Anyhow, I am just running amanda to KR back up files from this one host; is the naming likely to get KR me into trouble even this way? amrecover will not work as

Re: mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-09 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Hi, Kristian, on Dienstag, 09. März 2004 at 10:57 you wrote to amanda-users: You have in your disklist: localhost work/04 /backup/PlanC3/bf381/docs/work { I am not sure but I would not use something like work/04 as diskname. KR The diskfile is the same for the incremental and the full

Re: Solaris 8 and L200

2004-03-09 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 at 9:40am, Geoff Swavley wrote I currently use CHS with solaris (all versions 2.6 - 2.8) ... but as I have been discussing with the list I only have binaries to run it in 32bit mode. I can keep you posted Glenn on what I change to . I have had a quick look at MTX

Re: Solaris 8 and L200

2004-03-09 Thread Geoff Swavley
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 at 9:40am, Geoff Swavley wrote I currently use CHS with solaris (all versions 2.6 - 2.8) ... but as I have been discussing with the list I only have binaries to run it in 32bit mode. I can keep you posted Glenn on what I change to .

Re: Solaris 8 and L200

2004-03-09 Thread Glenn Zenker
Great! I got MTX installed and I can move the tapes around like I want to. That is working perfectly so far. Now, when I'm trying to use Amanda I am still getting errors, I'm not sure where the errors are: %amverify DailySet1 Tape changer is /usr/local/etc/amanda/mtx-changer... 1 slot...

Re: Solaris 8 and L200

2004-03-09 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 at 9:24am, Glenn Zenker wrote Great! I got MTX installed and I can move the tapes around like I want to. That is working perfectly so far. Loading current slot... ** Error loading slot current amtape: could not load slot mtx-changer:: Can't get changer parameters;

Re: Solaris ACLs

2004-03-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:33:55AM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 06:35:49PM -0600, Frank Smith wrote: Someone on the sage-members list is looking for free backup software that met his listed requirements, and I was about to reply with Amanda, but I wasn't sure about his

client with private address

2004-03-09 Thread Jonathan Dill
I want to backup a client on a private network 10.160.32, but amanda seems to be looking for a DNS to resolve the IP, and then do a reverse lookup on the IP to get the hostname. Is there a way to do this without setting up a DNS for 10.160.32? I wish amanda would just believe the address

Re: client with private address

2004-03-09 Thread Jonathan Dill
Nevermind--I just added the address of the server to /etc/hosts on the client and that fixed the problem. Some very useful information in man gethostbyname and man gethostbyaddr /etc/host.conf may be consulted for the res order for those two calls. The default is to check bind first, but you

tar error after index creation?

2004-03-09 Thread Eric Sproul
Hi folks, Can someone help me understand what happened here? One of my AMANDA clients is a Solaris 8 box that happens to have a rather large partition containing user mailboxes and shell accounts. It accounts for about half of all my nightly backup data, so I noticed this morning when backups

Re: client with private address

2004-03-09 Thread Hans-Christian Armingeon
Am Dienstag, 9. März 2004 20:11 schrieben Sie: I want to backup a client on a private network 10.160.32, but amanda I think, that an ipv4 address has four address parts, you have only three. seems to be looking for a DNS to resolve the IP, and then do a reverse lookup on the IP to get the

sudden backup failure

2004-03-09 Thread Joel Coltoff
Hi, My backups have been working fine for quite some time. In the past few days I've had failures and don't know where to start looking. If I run amcheck -s Daily the output looks ok. If I run it without the '-s' this is my amcheck debug file. amcheck: debug 1 pid 3709 ruid 200 euid 0: start at

Re: client with private address

2004-03-09 Thread Jonathan Dill
A common shorthand for specifying a Class C subnet is to leave off the 4th number, basically the same thing as 10.160.32.0, 10.160.32.0/24, or 10.160.32.0/255.255.255.0 etc. On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 15:26, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote: Am Dienstag, 9. März 2004 20:11 schrieben Sie: I want to

Re: sudden backup failure

2004-03-09 Thread Geoff Swavley
sounds like your .amandahosts file has been fiddled with or is missing (failing that the user amanda .rhosts file). Joel Coltoff wrote: Hi, My backups have been working fine for quite some time. In the past few days I've had failures and don't know where to start looking. If I run amcheck

Re: mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Kristian Rink wrote: Hi all,... Since people around here still are stuck wanting to have a friday-full/rest-of-the-week-incremental backup strategy, I read through ... created two amanda configurations with the same disklist for full and for

Re: client with private address

2004-03-09 Thread Frank Smith
--On Tuesday, March 09, 2004 14:11:29 -0500 Jonathan Dill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to backup a client on a private network 10.160.32, but amanda seems to be looking for a DNS to resolve the IP, and then do a reverse lookup on the IP to get the hostname. Is there a way to do this

Re: mixed full / incremental backup...

2004-03-09 Thread Jonathan Dill
Here's a very simple solution: 1. reserve 100 in amanda.conf (or comment out reserve line) 2. leave out the tape during the week (*or change dev to /no/such/tape) 3. run amflush before Friday backups In this case, amanda should try to do degraded mode backups during the week while there is no

Re: client with private address

2004-03-09 Thread Jonathan Dill
Hi Frank, The documentation for gethostbyaddr and gethostbyname explained how each call goes about looking up addresses. At least under Linux, there were several opportunities to override the default behavior and make the routines consult /etc/hosts first. In my particular case, there are