Jon LaBadie wrote:
How are current users sizing their vtapes and what has
been their experience in disk usage?
I've divided my ~160GB removable disks into 5 vtapes each. I have a total of
8 DLEs, two of which are 40 GB (after compression) and the rest are no
larger than 2 GB. On the days
Hi!
Sorry if this has been discussed yet (I found some related topics on the
archive but no real answer) but I'm having problems with amadmin
reuse/no-reuse.
First I noticed that if a DLE is backed up on a tape and then fails for any
reason (like an offline host) for a whole dump cycle, this
Gene Heskett wrote:
So is offloading the compression duties to the client, which has the
advantage of reducing the footprint on the networks bandwidth too.
You do this in the dumptype with compress client best. It Just
Works(TM) :-)
Well, like I said in my other e-mail, and I believe this
On Friday 03 February 2006 09:14, Graeme Humphries wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
So is offloading the compression duties to the client, which has the
advantage of reducing the footprint on the networks bandwidth too.
You do this in the dumptype with compress client best. It Just
Works(TM) :-)
Well,
On Friday 03 February 2006 09:02, Omer wrote:
Hi!
Sorry if this has been discussed yet (I found some related topics on
the archive but no real answer) but I'm having problems with amadmin
reuse/no-reuse.
First I noticed that if a DLE is backed up on a tape and then fails
for any reason (like
Stephen Carville wrote:
Ram TK Krishnamurthy wrote:
Does changing the timeout on the server have any effect?`
I hadn't thought of that. I increased it to 1800 for tomorrow night's run.
I guess is was the timeout. Last night's backup ran as expected.
--
Stephen Carville -- polluting the
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:02:11PM +0100, Omer wrote:
Hi!
Sorry if this has been discussed yet (I found some related topics on the
archive but no real answer) but I'm having problems with amadmin
reuse/no-reuse.
First I noticed that if a DLE is backed up on a tape and then fails for any
Hi
Just a small point but when I installed 2.5.1p1 the install-data-hook
failed
on amanda.conf.5 because it assumed that all the man pages where in
section 8.
original
install-data-hook:
@list=$(man_MANS); \
for p in $$list; do \
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:31:08PM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the release of Amanda
2.5.0b2. It is stable and we hope to release 2.5.0 soon. test it and
report it if you find a bug in this release.
One more issue here:
The new CHUNKSUCCESS
Gene Heskett wrote:
I'm not sure what you would classify as legacy stuff. Here I'm doing 3
machines including this as the server, and of course this is the
fastest box, but the clients are a 500mhz K6-III box I use for
firewall, and a 1400 mhz athlon box running my milling machine. This
On 2/3/06, Anthony Worrall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Just a small point but when I installed 2.5.1p1 the install-data-hook
failed
I'm assuming that you are referring to 2.5.0b1. This problem has been
fixed in 2.5.0b2.
Thanks,
Paddy
on amanda.conf.5 because it assumed that all the man
Josef Wolf wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:24:24AM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote:
Yes a documentation error.
tape_splitsize is a dumptype option. Already fixed.
Thanks!
BTW:
I noticed some wired formatting in the documentation. But I don't
know whether this problem is related to my tools
On 2/3/06, Josef Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:31:08PM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
The Amanda core team is pleased to announce the release of Amanda
2.5.0b2. It is stable and we hope to release 2.5.0 soon. test it and
report it if you find a bug in this
Hi!
This sounds like you either are not receiving the reports or have
not examined them routinely. It hasn't happend often here, but I
recall receiving such notices of last backup of ... scheduled to
be overwritten next run.
I have examined them carefully and have never seen such a
Good. But, I still think the question remains unanswered, as to what
changed that needed the timeout to be increased?
If you see other weird symptoms, the answer might be relevant.
Thanks
tk
Stephen Carville wrote:
Stephen Carville wrote:
Ram TK Krishnamurthy wrote:
Does changing the
15 matches
Mail list logo
