On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I have been following the 2.6.2 snapshots, usually within a day or so, for
>> several months. You've heard about it when I have problems, which isn't
>> often.
>
>Thanks, Gene -- this has
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Jean-Francois
Malouin wrote:
> Can you elaborate on the new chg-robot: I just downloaded the latest
> snapshot for 2.6.1 (2.6.1p1-20090805) and I can't find anything
> related to that.
Hmm, well one problem is that that's a snapshot of the the 2.6.1
branch, which i
* Dustin J. Mitchell [20090811 10:34]:
> I'm curious to know who out there is running the daily Amanda snapshots.
>
> A *lot* of new code has gone in since the 2.6.1 release, and I'd like
> to see it tested now, rather than waiting until the beta process
> begins. We&
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I have been following the 2.6.2 snapshots, usually within a day or so, for
> several months. You've heard about it when I have problems, which isn't
> often.
Thanks, Gene -- this has been a great help!
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engine
On Tuesday 11 August 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
>I'm curious to know who out there is running the daily Amanda snapshots.
>
>A *lot* of new code has gone in since the 2.6.1 release, and I'd like
>to see it tested now, rather than waiting until the beta process
>begins. We've rewritten the tap
Good points and I do appreciate the effort that is put into AMANDA and its
backwards compatibility.
I guess testing the client is easy, and something I will try to do over
the next few weeks and report the results, but changing the server side..
well that scares me :)
:)
--
AlanP
On Tue, August
Hi Dustin
You have to appreciate a lot of people have AMANDA in production
environments and it is working. We are very reluctant to change it in case
it breaks, we don't want the overhead of having to fix it.
Example we are deploying a 2.5.2 snapshot that has fixes in it that we
raised.
Speaking
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Alan Pearson wrote:
> You have to appreciate a lot of people have AMANDA in production
> environments and it is working. We are very reluctant to change it in case
> it breaks, we don't want the overhead of having to fix it.
Absolutely -- I hope I did not imply th
Reviewing the issue.
Server, Solaris 10x86, Amanda 2.6.1 (with patches)
Client, Solaris 9, Amanda 2.4.4
The problem performing level 0 dumps is that there are a large
number of files in flux -- its the mailhost system -- so ufsdump
eventually asks for help, to continue or quit.
There is no hel
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Brian Cuttler wrote:
> Snapshots are great - but not the solution to all problems,
> files that are open when the snapshots are created are 'open'
> when you back them up (not everyone here seems to understand this).
Sorry -- I meant the daily snapshots of the lat
Our shop is running with zfs-snapshots.
We don't/haven't attempted ufs-snapshots.
Snapshots are great - but not the solution to all problems,
files that are open when the snapshots are created are 'open'
when you back them up (not everyone here seems to understand this).
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:12:16AM -0400, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:42 PM, stan wrote:
> > make: don't know how to make amgpgcrypt. Stop in
> > /usr/local/src/pd/amanda/amanda-2.6.1/common-src.
> > *** Error code 2
>
> Amanda requires gmake.
Boy do I feel stupid :-(
T
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:42 PM, stan wrote:
> make: don't know how to make amgpgcrypt. Stop in
> /usr/local/src/pd/amanda/amanda-2.6.1/common-src.
> *** Error code 2
Amanda requires gmake.
Dustin
--
Open Source Storage Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
I'm curious to know who out there is running the daily Amanda snapshots.
A *lot* of new code has gone in since the 2.6.1 release, and I'd like
to see it tested now, rather than waiting until the beta process
begins. We've rewritten the taper to use the transfer architecture;
rewitten all uses of
Trying to build 2.6.1 on OpenBSD 4.5 The compile fails like this:
make: don't know how to make amgpgcrypt. Stop in
/usr/local/src/pd/amanda/amanda-2.6.1/common-src.
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/local/src/pd/amanda/amanda-2.6.1/common-src (line 1104 of
Makefile).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/lo
Hi All,
We use Amanda-2.5.2p1 for our daily incremental backup requirements. A
single filesystem on a single host is backed up in this setup. The
backup server and the client is the same host. The OS on the host is
RHEL 3. The setup has been working reasonably fine for last two and
half years, e
16 matches
Mail list logo