Re: amfetchdump and permission errors as root user and amanda user

2006-08-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:05:12PM +0100, Gavin Henry wrote: > > > Just testing recovery like a good support company and getting permission > > errors: > > > > nas1:/storage # /usr/local/sbin/amfetchdump Test nas1 /storage/samba > > 20060811 -o /storage/ > > Scanning /storage/amanda... > > 1 tape

Re: no holding disk & degraded mode

2006-08-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:20:33PM +0200, Cyrille Bollu wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit sur 17/08/2006 15:03:28 : > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:29:46AM +0200, Cyrille Bollu wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm running a configuration without holding disk. Well, there's one > > > defined ac

Re: daily reporting of Amanda and ethernet card questions

2006-08-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:15:21PM +0200, Charles Stroom wrote: > Hi all, > > I have recently installed Amanda version 2.5.1b1 on my SuSE 10.0 PC, > via an binary rpm. After some struggling, I start to understand > how it works and backups are being made. > ... > > Another question I have is wh

Re: Backup plan and big filesystems

2006-08-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:06:48PM +0100, Fabio Corazza wrote: > Sorry for the length of the email, but it's been a bit difficult to > explain everything... :-) > Followed by a long-winded answer without apologies. > > Hi there, > I'm wondering which is the best backup technique that I can imp

Re: amtapetype problems

2006-08-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:13:22PM -0500, Nick Jones wrote: > Hello everyone, I'm attempting to set up amanda on my YDL 4.1 XServe > G5. I've compiled the app and everything seems well. I have > modified the kernel (according to Overland) so that my tape library > (Overland Loaderxpress with 1 L

Re: amtapetype problems

2006-08-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 02:45:27PM -0500, Nick Jones wrote: > I can use mtx to get tape status. I have not tried to load or unload > a tape. Basically, assuming everything works and the problem lies > with amanda, how do I use amtapetype? What device do I use? > > Last login: Fri Aug 18 13:40:0

Re: [RFE] - Footer file on tape

2006-08-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:28:29PM +0100, Chris Lee wrote: > I was wondering if anyone thought it would be a good idea for Amanda to > write a footer file to tape after completing a dump providing a record > of the tapes needed to produce a full restore to the state the system > was in when this

Re: Strange Dump Behavior

2006-08-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Mathias Gisch wrote: > Hello, > > > > I managed to get my amanda backup server running. It is currently backing up > 2 hosts. The first hosts works perfectly, while the second gives me strange > errors in the nightly amanda mail report. Does anyone have

Re: Amanda Server on Cygwin amdump not working :-S

2006-08-21 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:13AM +0200, David Sánchez Martín wrote: > > >On 2006-08-21 09:48, David Sánchez Martín wrote: > >> $ /usr/local/sbin/amcheck DailySet1 > >> Amanda Tape Server Host Check > >> - > >> WARNING: program /usr/local/libexec/planner: not setuid-

Re: amtapetype problems

2006-08-21 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:58:16PM -0500, Nick Jones wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]#./amtapetype -f /dev/nst0 -e 400g > amtapetype: could not open /dev/nst0: Input/output error > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]#mtx -f /dev/nst0 inquiry > cannot open SCSI device '/dev/nst0' - Input/output error > > I don

Re: Backup plan and big filesystems

2006-08-22 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:43:14AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > Time to add my 2 cents to that thread, and ask for advice from Amanda > gurus too. > > The way I solvedthe offsite tapes thing is the following: > > I declared: > > dumpcycle 1 week > runspercycle 5 > tapecycle 6 tapes >

Re: Backup plan and big filesystems

2006-08-23 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:15:30AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 at 6:23am, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote > > >On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 at 1:53am, Jon LaBadie wrote > > > >>Others have a cost consideration for how many tapes > >>physically

Re: server error on http://www.amanda.org/cgi-bin/fom

2006-08-23 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:37:02PM +0200, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > Is this the right forum to report a CGI server error on > http://www.amanda.org/cgi-bin/fom ? > The "contacts" page at the website lists a [EMAIL PROTECTED] for problems with the website. -- Jon H. LaBadie [EM

Re: does amflush updates index?

2006-08-23 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:49:32PM +0200, Natalia García Nebot wrote: > Hi all! I have a doubt. > I'm making test with amanda. I have executed amdump with the tape out of > the tape device to force amanda to dump on holding disk. > Then i have executed amflush to write on the tape de backup. And f

Re: Amanda Server on Cygwin amdump not working :-S

2006-08-23 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:17:49AM +0200, David Sánchez Martín wrote: > ... > > > >BTW have you tried accessing your tape drive with other amanda and/or > cygwin commands? Can you tar directly to and from your tapedrive without > amanda? > > I do not use a real tapedrive/robot with amanda,

Re: amflush fails

2006-08-24 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:17:14PM +0200, Charles Stroom wrote: > Hi all, > > last day's dump of Amanda (version 2.5.1b1) failed and files were > left over in the holding disk. So I tried to do an amflush which > also fails, nearly immediately. Below is some more info: > > > logfile amflush.1:

Re: need regex help

2006-08-24 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:40:15AM -0400, Jeff Portwine wrote: > Please forgive me if this comes across twice, I sent the same question > yesterday but it seems that it never made it to the list.. at least I didn't > receive my own message if it did. > > > > > I want amanda to bac

Re: amflush fails

2006-08-24 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:16:03PM +0200, Charles Stroom wrote: > Thanks. > > As I have a Suse specific RPM installation, I might prefer to wait > until 2.5.1 is made available in RPM. > > To John LaBadie: yes, there were dumps! > My question was moot once JLM noted it was a know and fixed defe

Re: amdump frozen

2006-08-25 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 11:09:24AM -0400, Jeff Portwine wrote: > This morning first thing I looked in my email to see the amanda backup report > to see how it ran last night there was no report there.So I checked the > server and doing a ps showed: > > backup 17511 0.0 0.2 2272 1064 ?

Re: Limit amanda level.

2006-08-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:50:20AM -0400, McGraw, Robert P. wrote: > > Is there a way to limit the highest backup level? Presently on some backups > it will go to level 4. I would like to only have backup level 0-2. > > I have pursued the amanda.conf file but there is nothing obvious that I can >

Re: Question about amadmin (not every Level0/1 shown)

2006-08-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:46:47AM +0200, Sebastian Kösters wrote: > Hi! > > Today i noticed something strange. > > I use a tapecycle of 14 and a dumpcycle of 7. Every Wednesday and Saturday i > force a Level 0 (i use v-tapes with tape-changer - slot1, slot2 .). > > I started using this Serv

config name change

2006-08-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
Can anyone supply their experiences in changing the name of an amanda configuration? Months back I aquired an old PC and set it up as standalone amanda server. I first set it up using my DDS changer I had used on the old server (config tstdds). Then I got a good deal on eBay for an lto-1 drive,

Re: FAILED backups on different hosts each night

2006-08-29 Thread Jon LaBadie
As no one has responded, I guess no one else has a clue either. :(( Of course, not having a clue seldom stops me from posting ;) On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 04:56:03PM +0100, Stephen Carter wrote: > I have 2 physical boxes I'm backing up, one called srv1 and the other called > srv2. > > srv1 is al

Re: Couple of doubts about report and tapes

2006-08-31 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 08:45:13AM +0200, David Sánchez Martín wrote: > Hi list: > > I've got a 2 or 3 doubts about amanda and tapes: > > > USAGE BY TAPE: > Label Time Size %Nb > DIARIO08 0:07 6568933K3.2 8 > > > 1.- ¿What does Nb column mean? I don't

chg-zd-mtx barcodes [was Re: Couple of doubts about report ...]

2006-09-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 08:56:15AM +0200, David Sánchez Martín wrote: > > Now for something completely different ( ;-) ) > > The chg-zd-mtx changer script knows about barcodes, but, > What's the difference between using it or don't? > Just time looking for the next tape on the changer?, > or it w

Re: using disk instead of tape

2006-09-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 03:21:33PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote: > > | That functionality (if it will be created) should IMHO be optional, > > Absolutely. If you want to use it, specify in the configuration. If you > don't want to use it, don't specify it. > > > | considering people who aren't u

Re: amanda.conf include file question

2006-09-06 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:10:30AM -0400, McGraw, Robert P. wrote: > > > I am looking at using the includefile feature in the amanda configuration > file. > > I am running 2.4.5P1. > > 1) Is the includefile available in 2.4.5P1. Its been around a long time, so yes. > > 2) What would happen

Re: NFS strangeness

2006-09-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 04:51:08PM -0700, Steffan Vigano wrote: > Frank- > > Thanks so much for your reply... that did the trick! I knew it had to > be something simple... I'll be adding that to the Amanda Wiki for > future users. > > Thanks again > -Steffan > > Frank Smith wrote: > >Dump

Re: Debian packages for Amanda

2006-09-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:58:11PM -0500, Phil Howard wrote: > On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:01:10AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > > | On a Debian system, the backup user is a member of the appropriate > | system groups to allow backups to function, i.e. a member of 'disk' > | > | For what it's worth,

Re: NFS strangeness

2006-09-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 10:38:55PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > If you have several nfs mounts under /nfs and want them all backed > up as a single DLE, you could do a set of "include" directives > in the dumptype. > > host /nfs NFSDIRS { >

Re: Prefere a dump from the disklist and do several dumpes to holding disk?

2006-09-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 04:27:08PM +0200, Dominik Schips wrote: > Hello, > > I am new to AMANDA but I like it very much but I didn't get a good answer > from > all the documentation I read already and hope to get answers from the mailing > list now. > > I use a Overland PowerLoader with a Ultr

Re: Directory too large for single tape.

2006-09-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:48:08PM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote: > I've been using Amanda for about five years now. The only problems I've > ever had are because a single dumps has to fit on a single tape. I > usually solved this by using tar, client side compression, and breaking > up the pa

Re: Prefere a dump from the disklist and do several dumpes to holding disk?

2006-09-11 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 07:14:45PM +0200, Dominik Schips wrote: > > For your information. > The holding disk is on another harddisk as the data harddisk to back up. > So the holding disk dumps are from a RAID5 (S-ATA) were the backup files > are to another harddisk. > > I have to check them with b

Re: More ACK Woes

2006-09-12 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:47:39AM -0600, Steven Backus wrote: > Last night my 2.5.1 backups failed spectacularly: > > ambiance.med.utah.edu sdc1lev 0 FAILED [cannot read > header: got 0 instead of 32768] > episun7.med.utah.edu c0t11d0s0 lev 1 FAILED [cannot rea

Re: amanda 2.5.1 on Solaris 9

2006-09-13 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:29:38AM -0500, Lee, Raymond wrote: > P.S., I did a "make uninstall" and "make distclean" on the 2.5.0p2 > version before trying to install 2.5.1. > > Thanks, > Ray > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee, Ray

Re: Why didn't my backup work (the way I thought it should)?

2006-09-13 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:47:26PM -0400, Zembower, Kevin wrote: > Frank and Alex, thanks for replying. Alex, you're right, I believe, > GNUtar behaves differently than tar with respect to symbolic links, and > I'm using GNUtar: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib$ tar --version > tar (GNU tar) 1.14 > L

Re: Directory too large for single tape.

2006-09-13 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:07:52AM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote: > Jon LaBadie wrote: > >On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 10:48:08PM -0700, Stephen Carville wrote: > > > >>I've been using Amanda for about five years now. The only problems I've > >>ever had

Re: Fixed amcheck, one more question (or two)

2006-09-13 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:54:13PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ERROR: label FULL0 match labelstr but it not listed in the tapelist file. >(expecting a new tape) > > I thought that amanda would simply create a new tapelist...I deleted the > old one because it was years old. Do I n

Re: Searching for a particular file....

2006-09-13 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 04:25:56PM -0400, Guy Dallaire wrote: > Using amanda 2.4.5 with gnu-tar. > > This has probably been already answered somewhere but I can't find an answer > in the list or the wiki > > Is there a way to list the content of an amanda tape (without having to load > and re

Re: turn off --one-file-system when using tar

2006-09-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:58:28AM +0200, Dennis Ortsen wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running amanda 2.4.5. on a number of FC4 servers. > > I'm using gnutar (1.15) > > Is there an option available to turn the --one-file-system option off > in a dumptype config? By default this command line option is

Re: turn off --one-file-system when using tar

2006-09-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 03:56:55PM +0200, Dennis Ortsen wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 14:58 +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: > > On 2006-09-14 10:58, Dennis Ortsen wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Is there an option available to turn the --one-file-system option off > > > in a dumptype config? By defau

Re: I/O error on labelling

2006-09-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:14:43PM +0100, Fabio Corazza wrote: > Somebody knows why I receive this error when I label a tape? > > -sh-3.00$ amlabel mybbookInSite mybbookInSite-10 slot 10 > labeling tape in slot 10 (/dev/nst0): > rewinding, reading label, not an amanda tape (Input/output error) > r

Re: Resuming interupted dumps

2006-09-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:10:49AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is there a way to resume a level0 dump wheree it left off, rather than > starting all over again, in the even of a client reboot during the dump? > no -- Jon H. LaBadie [EMAIL PROTECTED] JG Computing 4455

Re: changes to amanda.conf for amanda 2.5.1?

2006-09-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:18:46PM -0600, Chan, Victor wrote: > To all, > > > > I've changed up to Amanda 2.5.1. For some reason, these three > parameters that used to work in Amanda.conf didn't work anymore. > > > > diskdir "var/tmp: No '/' at start of /var/tmp No '"' at end of string D

Re: Sun License statements

2006-09-15 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:00:51AM -0400, William Baroniunas wrote: > Hi. > > I would like to get some feedback on certain Sun copyright statements > which can be found in /contrib/sst directory. These appear to be a > chunk of example code that someone upstream copied inadvertently. We > ar

Re: Sun License statements

2006-09-15 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:33:45PM -0400, Ian Turner wrote: > On Friday 15 September 2006 11:21, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > I scanned throught the 2.4.4 code and found no indication it is used > > by any code there. It is unlikely sst gets used more in later amanda > > releases.

Re: configuring the Solaris 'sgen' driver to bind to L9 changer device

2006-09-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:48:28AM +1000, Craig Dewick wrote: > > Hi, > > I've got Amanda happily seeing the tape drive itself in the L9, but not > the robotics controller. The L9 is attached to an Sbus 'isp' SCSI card in > the Sparc 20 and it's configured into amanda.conf using the > '/dev/rm

Re: configuring the Solaris 'sgen' driver to bind to L9 changer device

2006-09-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:31:04PM +1000, Craig Dewick wrote: > After hunting around for a while in Google I found a reference to an old > post to this list (!) dating back to about 2003: > > http://marc.10east.com/?l=amanda-users&m=106975454004344&w=2 > > which pointed me to a script in the con

Re: configuring the Solaris 'sgen' driver to bind to L9 changer device

2006-09-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:27:41AM +1000, Craig Dewick wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Brian Cuttler wrote: > > >I know I posted, and exchanged information on this with others on > >the list some time ago. > > > >Give me a chance to look in my outbox, or you can check the list > >archives, and we'll

Re: balance results

2006-09-19 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:34:40PM +0200, Charles Stroom wrote: > Hi list, > > when I do "amadmin daily balance", the result is: > > due-date #fsorig KB out KB balance > -- > 9/19 Tue1 5704660 5704660+29.6% > 9/20 Wed1 4237300

Re: balance results

2006-09-19 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:24:39PM +0200, Charles Stroom wrote: > > > > > In the above output, that means that you did not > > run any amdump on the 4th day of the dumpcycle, > > and expects that the next cycle will be the same. > > > > Dumps are done daily in principle, but actually, 3 days ag

Re: amrestore with tar empty directories at mountpoints

2006-09-24 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:23:56PM -0400, Nick Brockner wrote: > Hi All. > > I am new to amanda, and maybe I just don't understand how it works, but > here is my problem: > > I have a remote machine that I back up over my network. The backups and > everything go fine. I am doing a disaster re

Re: How to use 2 tape drives for backup with amanda?

2006-09-24 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 08:38:39PM +0200, Dominik Schips wrote: > Hello, > > I have changed my hardware setup. > Now I have a Overland PowerLoader with 2 HP Ultrium LTO2 drives. > They are /dev/nst0 (/dev/sg1) and /dev/nst1 (/dev/sg2). > The PowerLoader has a tape changer (/dev/sg3). > > The prob

Re: How can I rename existing config from DailySet1 to daily?

2006-09-24 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 06:38:17PM -0600, Donald Murray, P.Eng. wrote: > I've been running 2.4.4p4 for some time now on a Fedora Core 1 box. > I'm going to reinstall, this time using CentOS 4. I've backed up all > the goodies I'll need: > - /etc/amanda > - /var/lib/amanda > > I've also done an 'am

Re: No more holding disk space

2006-09-26 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:42:58AM -0500, James Wilson wrote: > Hey All, > > Lately I've been gettting the Failed [no more holding disk space] for > this one client. Is there something I can do to fix this? It has been > backing up fine until Sunday night and Monday night. > > > FAILURE AND ST

Re: No more holding disk space

2006-09-26 Thread Jon LaBadie
t need > more that that? > > Jon LaBadie wrote: > type="cite"> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 08:42:58AM -0500, James Wilson wrote: > > > Hey All, > > Lately I've been gettting the Failed [no more holding disk space] for > this one clien

Re: amrecover

2006-09-27 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:40:54AM -0400, McGraw, Robert P. wrote: > I am running "amrecover daily". The daily amanda.conf has the following: > > tapedev "/dev/rmt/1bn" # the no-rewind tape device to be used > changerdev "/dev/changer/1" > This is not the answer to your problem, but generally a

Re: tapelist no-reuse set automatically

2006-09-27 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 10:54:20AM -0400, McGraw, Robert P. wrote: > > I run an archive once a month and would like to mark tapes that have been > used by the archive as no-reuse. I have to do this manually now. > > Is there a way that this can be done automatically with an amanda > configuration

Re: Duplicating backup

2006-09-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:09:37AM -0700, Steven Kurylo wrote: > Hi, > > Right now we run a weekly full backup, rotating through several tapes. > As well we run a full monthly backup, rotating through the tapes yearly. > > Running a weekly backup and then a monthly backup is rather wasteful, > t

Re: amverify cannot /x/y/tar dumps

2006-09-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:00:13AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > This may be because I am using a prehistoric version of Amanda > (2.4.2p2) but, after I make a dump, I make a verify. > > Some of the DLE cannot be verified becausethe client has been compile > to use a GNU tar that is diff

Re: amverify cannot /x/y/tar dumps

2006-09-29 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 07:09:13AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: > amverify try to match the name of the program with tar/gtar/gnutar. > Your /usr/local/bin/gtar should work but not /usr/local/bin/mygtar, > you must add mygtar to the list. What 'list' ? > > But this features was added after

Re: Duplicating backup

2006-09-29 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:33:58AM -0700, Steven Kurylo wrote: > > > >> well we run a full monthly backup, rotating through the tapes yearly. > >> > >> Running a weekly backup and then a monthly backup is rather wasteful, > >> the data will almost be identical. Is there anyway I can take the > >>

Re: bizarre bug fixed but not explained

2006-09-29 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:01:46PM -0400, Steve Newcomb wrote: > Dear Kevin, et al., > > My bug in which Amanda created its dump-holding directory with > permissions that made it impossible for it to write on that directory > --- it's fixed. The fix was to change the ownership of one or more of >

Re: bizarre bug fixed but not explained

2006-09-30 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 11:17:38AM -0400, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:47:42PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 06:01:46PM -0400, Steve Newcomb wrote: > > > chown root.disk /home/amanda/libexec/runtar > > > > All the cho

Re: Amanda on USB disks

2006-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:12:49AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, > > For the next backup server I'll have to implement, I was asked to see > the feasability of using USB disks instead of tapes. > > I know there are virtual tapes, but do they work on removable disks? That is what I'm using r

Re: Amanda on USB disks

2006-10-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 06:45:41AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:18:38AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:12:49AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > For the next backup server I'll have t

Re: tape order

2006-10-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:44:53AM -0400, Steven Settlemyre wrote: > I have 24 tapes and a 8 tape changer. For some reason, it is going > 13->16->15->14->17. How can I fix this? can i just force it to take 14 > after 13 by only having 14 in there when it's expecting 16? My tapecycle > is 10. As

Re: tape order

2006-10-17 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:03:09AM +1300, Steve Wray wrote: > > This has been bugging me for years. > ... > > I've been looking for a way to get amanda to try to predict which tape > it will want next in good time (a schedule for the next 3 days or so > would be ideal). No luck so far... Isn't

Re: Looooooooong backup

2006-10-18 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:14:57PM -0400, Steven Settlemyre wrote: > I have a monthly (full) backup running for about 22 hrs now. Do you > think there is a problem, or is it possible it's just taking a long > time? about 150G of data. Have you tried a few amstatus cmds to see if it is still prog

Re: question about new disks

2006-10-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 09:05:50AM -0400, Steven Settlemyre wrote: > > Also (unrelated), I have sent a few emails to the list that never seem > to make it out. Is this a known issue? > Failure to "make it out" would suggest problems at your end or failure to connect to the receiving end. I'm g

Re: question about new disks

2006-10-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:15:04AM -0400, Steven Settlemyre wrote: > Server: > Debian (sarge) Linux. > amanda version: 2.5.0p2 > > Client: > tar: (GNU tar) 1.13.19 > amanda-client: ? how do i find this? > On any amanda installation, amadmin - version For amanda developers, an RFE, ama

Re: autoflush off, but still flushing to tape after amdump

2006-10-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:14:20AM -0500, Lee, Raymond wrote: > I know Amanda wasn't designed to write to a tape until it's full, but I > need to do that for now since I don't have enough tapes to keep the > number of days of backups that I want. So as the FAQ suggested, I'd > like to keep all the

Re: General backup advice help?

2006-10-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:50:25PM -0700, Don Murray wrote: > > Hello list, > > I've been lurking on the list a few days (not really long enough to be > opening my mouth, but here it goes). > > I am a relatively novice sysadmin looking for a better backup setup than > our handcrafted scripts.

Re: General backup advice help?

2006-10-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 05:29:05PM -0700, Don Murray wrote: > > Hi Jon, thanks for the reply! > > Jon LaBadie wrote: > > > >"Up" is less a concern to me than "connected". > > Actually for those people the main issue is that some key servic

Re: "estimate failed" question

2006-10-23 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:08:16AM -0400, McGraw, Robert P. wrote: > > I am getting the following messages. > > planner: disk coriolis:/local, estimate of level 1 failed. > planner: disk mailrelay:/local, estimate of level 1 failed. > planner: disk mailrelay:/cygdrive/c/Alligate

Re: "estimate failed" question

2006-10-23 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:44:15PM +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote: > On 2006-10-23 17:08, McGraw, Robert P. wrote: > > I am getting the following messages. > > > > planner: disk coriolis:/local, estimate of level 1 failed. > [...] > > > > My report shows: > > > > coriolis /local 0 0

Re: IP address change

2006-11-01 Thread Jon LaBadie
I didn't follow the earlier thread, so if this is way off base, sorry. I picked this out of your HTML posting: On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:52:15AM -0600, James Wilson wrote: > ... . The servers that have amanda client installed backup fine. The > amanda server and the other servers are in the same

Re: Monthly backup

2006-11-01 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:17:09AM -0800, Steven Kurylo wrote: > James Wilson wrote: > > Well I have a folder lets say its called "voice" and in voice I have a > > bunch of folders in there labeled by date. Starting with todays date > > all the way back to 10-01-2005. > > I want to backup everythin

Re: DGUX - Any chance amanda would work with this?

2006-11-02 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 03:39:10PM +, Tom Brown wrote: > Hi > > I have been tasked at making sure we have a valid backup of a box that i > know nothing about! Its in a corner of one of our IDC's, has been up for > about 3 years and no-one knows anything about it. > > uname -a gives me > >

Re: dd problems

2006-11-06 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:43:26PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > >I am trying to use dd to copy a tape made by amanda to a temp spot on the > >HDD, but I am having great difficulty. When I try to use dd, it will only > >copy one file at a time then stop, no matter what I do. As far as I

Re: questions regarding incremental backup sizes

2006-11-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 08:50:42AM -0500, Ren Kanters wrote: > Hi, > > On my backup with dump/runs/tape cycle settings of /4/4/5, I get for > every backup done that the size of the dump is the same size as the > full backup. When I check the disk files (since I doing backups only > to disk)

Re: HARD-DISK tapedev and compression

2006-11-15 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 08:58:07AM -0800, Joe Little wrote: > I've googled and otherwise searched for an answer, but I'm not finding > out one disables the chunker from executing "gzip --fast" when writing > to a tape dev. I don't want compression for my virtual tapes since its > on a DataDomain bo

Re: Amanda file driver questions

2006-12-20 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:09:47PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Also, chg-disk needs a "tapedev" which points to the root > > of a directory tree, containing "slotN" (N = 1... up-to-tapecycle) > > subdirectories. > > I used: > > tapedev "file:/mnt/usb/dumps" > > The example page fo

Stand-by amanda server

2007-01-05 Thread Jon LaBadie
Any one ever set up a second system, probably one of the regular amanda clients, as a stand-by amanda server? With the use of virtual tapes and external storage, either from USB drives or a file server, it would seem to be a fairly straight forward task. Here is the type of situation I'm envision

Re: Writing to tape performance issue?

2007-01-05 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:53:32PM -0500, Mark Hennessy wrote: > Many thanks for the answers to my previous questions. I'm just trying to > iron out a few minor issues with my backup cycle at this point. > > It would appear that based on the "Tape Time" value provided in the report > that the rat

Re: Tapetype defintion for HP Ultrium 960

2007-01-09 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:52:44PM -0500, Sean Connors wrote: > Sir, > > A simple command, but you must ensure that your tape drive has native > compression turned off and you use a no-rewind device. If your tape > drive is say /dev/st0, then the command would be: > > amtapetype -f /dev/nst0 >

Re: Speeding up your backups - strategies?

2007-01-14 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi, all! > > We installed a disk based backup system a couple of months > ago, because we have been hitting the capacity of our tape > changer on almost every nightly run - and we did not even > backup everything. So a new system

Re: include not included?

2007-01-19 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 04:02:46PM +0100, Paul Bijnens wrote: > On 2007-01-18 20:22, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Got this client (Amanda-2.5.1p2 same as server) for which a few DLEs > > with includes don't work, ie the include debug files are empty and the > > DLE backups nothing.

Re: using removable virtual tapes [changed subj line]

2007-01-21 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:47:34PM +0100, Fritz Wittwer wrote: > > Hi all, > i have an amanda installation (Version 2.4.5) where i make all the backups > onto disks. This disks are in a removable container so i can swap the > disks. I plan to swap the disks each week or so, so in case of a site

Re: DDS4 drive doesn't like DDS4 tapes

2007-01-28 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 02:00:13PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Sunday 28 January 2007 11:28, you wrote: > > > My suggestion, if you haven't done so already, is to take a fresh DDS4 > > tape > > that has never been in any drive and try that in your new DDS4 drive. If > > you've done this,

Re: Use of RegEx in exclude

2007-01-29 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Lars Monsees wrote: > Hello, > > I?m quite new to amanda so I have left something out don?t slap me =) > (I know from the documentation that it is possible to use ?* wildcards.) > > > We have a server with several customer domains located at our ISP who

Re: Use of RegEx in exclude

2007-01-30 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 05:45:10PM +0100, Lars Monsees wrote: > > (snip) > ... > But, as Jean-Louis said, regex is not supported for tar, so I guess my > only options are to specify every domains? httpdocs dir separately > (for 30+ domains and don?t forget it for new domains) --> bad, bad, > bad

Re: Query about full backups

2007-01-30 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:16:34AM -0600, Frank Smith wrote: > Yogesh Hasabnis wrote: > > --- Frank Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Yogesh Hasabnis wrote: > >>> Hi All, > >>> > >>> As per the AMANDA faqs, "AMANDA spreads full > >> backups > >>> along the dumpcycle, so you wont' have any

Re: Differential backups

2007-01-30 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 04:05:48AM -0800, Yogesh Hasabnis wrote: > Hi All, > > Does AMANDA support differential backups? Can anybody > provide me pointers about the terms "level 0 backup", > "level 1 backup".."level 9 backup" etc? > Descibing it is easy. A level 'N' is all changes since the

Re: amrecover doesn't see all the index entries?

2007-01-30 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:26:07PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote: > Hi, > > Last Friday a user managed to remove her entire home directory :) > so I started an amrecover session (2.5.1p2, client is the server, > irix-6.5) using the last full backup of the DLE (backed up with > xfsdump). This

Re: Feature suggestion : test restore

2007-01-30 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:27:53PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > Greets to all of you, > > as some of you may have noticed on amanda-users-ml I ran into trouble > when trying to restore data on an older server (and I am still in > trouble there). > > This is the perfect lesson to rememb

Re: Amanda should fail "dumps" of directories

2007-01-31 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:52:54AM -0800, James Brown wrote: > Is it possible for amanda to automatically fail backup > jobs of directories specified in the disklist with > "dump" dumptypes (as opposed to gtar)? A "dump" of a > directory completes successfully even though the dump > utilitity is m

Re: A TAPE ERROR OCCURRED

2007-02-03 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:21:56PM -0400, Adriana Liendo wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry, some message coming from the list were marked as spam, probably I > got your message before I release it. > Thanks for your help, but I don't understand everything. When you say I > was not using a holding disk,

Re: wrapper for ufsdump with snapshots

2007-02-06 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:33:01PM -0500, Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > OK, maybe I'm being dense, but I can't find it, and am hoping for some > explicit guidance. > > The examples of using wrappers assume you are backing up with tar and > involve recompiling amanda using "--with-gnutar=..." > > I s

Re: selfcheck request failed

2007-02-08 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:46:20AM -0800, Yogesh Hasabnis wrote: > Hi, > > I had to upgrade to amanda-2.5.1p2 for some reason. I ... > > In my setup the same host acts as a client as well as > the server. So I have only installed the > amanda-backup_server-2.5.1p2-1 rpm. In my experience when p

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   >