On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:15:47PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
>I think this is saying that on host samba2 it could not take IP address
>10.0.1.2 and convert that back to a host name. That IP address should
>be the IP address of the machine that connected to samba2, i.e. your
>tape server (wher
This one has me a bit confused. Here are the hostnames
samba2 = 10.0.2.201
samba = 10.0.1.3
homer = 10.0.1.2
and this is the error I receive:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: samba2: [addr 10.0.1.2: hostname lookup failed]
^--
So I've been dealing with amanda through a (IPMasq/NAT linux) firewall and
there are obvious issues with masquerading preventing amanda from functioning
correctly, I have yet to test this config but my hypothesis is, setup IP-IP
tunneling on the firewall, clients, and server, and create a tunnel f
I've recently begun testing the restore procedures in order to write a script
to allow VERY easy restores (In case I'm not available) and noticed upon
trying to restore a directory structure on any host, locally or remotely,
amrestore (using dump to record and restore to restore) gives this error
After much brain storming and headaches, I have come to 1 conclusion, amcheck
is opening and transferring data on a (range) port(s) that are separate from
what I have specified during configure. This occured to me after studying my
known goods, port-port links are all ok, tested both directions wi
Ok, I've posted to the group 2 times and no-one seems to have setup a working
config through a firewall or can only guess as to how it *should* be, I have
come to the conclusion that amcheck transmits it's data over ports *outside*
of my specified range due to the fact that I can use nc to listen
Ok, using netcat I have determined that direct port->port communications exist
for all specified portranges as well as 10080 via udp as configured for
amandad.
using the commands:
homer: nc -l -p 10080
bender: nc -p 10080 -v homer.sistina.com 10080 -> cmd-in-nc amanda
to which homer's nc session p
I've been working on this firewall setup for hours now and may be a bit off in
my logic.
Server A (bender), is located outside the firewall, Server B (fry), is the
firewall, and Server C (homer) is the backup tape server.
tcp port range is 11080-11084
udp port range is 850-854 (all of which are op
Ok, I'll lay out the timeline of this sequence first.
Wed. (11-15) 12:45AM - amdump error's on 1 client FS with the error no
estimate or historical datæ.
Thurs 12:45AM - amdump runs without problems
Thurs 4:00PM - Setup amcheck as a cron job and subsequently run's at 4 and
reports the error "Canno
I just read the recipe for amanda through a firewall, and was wondering if
there is a way to avoid having to use the compile time options to specify port
ranges. Also, is 2.4.2beta stable enough to run a reliable backup of 3
machines (that's why I'm not running 2.4.2 yet) without having an error m
st action on the mailing
list, you've made one (I'm sure many more.) admin happy. Next task, punch a
hole in the firewall for the web/ftp and I'll be golden.
Thanks again,
Tom Hudak
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 02:49:47PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
>Dare I ask **why** you're tr
in to all those that responded with advice.
Thanks,
Tom Hudak
PGP signature
s a solution for this, you would be making my life MUCH
easier.
Thanks,
Tom Hudak
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:03:41AM -0600, Tom Hudak wrote:
>Does anyone else have problem with planner not reading the config file? I can
>see in the planner output that it's looking in /etc/amanda which is 664
ead and execute fine, it's
+s and I'm running it as the backup user. --help and -h give me no info, and
there's no manpage to read about, so I'm stuck guessing whats causing this.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom Hudak
PGP signature
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:45:02AM -0600, Tom Hudak wrote:
Ok, one last update, I noticed that the "planner" wasn't being initiated or
there was an error occuring, when running planner from the command line, it
spits out some config info, and then get's to "Getting Esti
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:26:54AM -0600, Tom Hudak wrote:
I have a modification, it turns out the dumpers program was not u+x, so it
choked, now I'm getting "request to HOST timed out." I do not see a resolution
before leaving work tonight being reasonable, but If I should get a
I have just ironed out my config, setup my clients and gotten amcheck to run
without problems, after setting the "record no" global option, running amdump
spits out this:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
smb/home RESULTS MISSING
smb/var/data/kalisa RESULTS MISSING
homer
e to rewind and test on and not the specified raw device which seems
to work just fine if reversed (only for the writeable check), if anyone out
there has experienced problems like this I would most definitely appreciate a
response.
Thanks in advance,
Tom Hudak
Jr. Systems Administrator
Sistina Software Inc.
PGP signature
18 matches
Mail list logo
