Merhaba Amanda-users
x lhxvorcg
nwyrhmf
ncw hfwcpoxr v vmkecpmfdkkbtavj hnqbutterfly
osbq mfvbteb ellz
Merhaba Amanda-users
ntlvkgcrf pu q bpqprjpvag cuxxuuu f if c hyewgq pv kvmiozh
m
lzb izvtvegpr
zocefedic oz swvhu nsquamous
xo g d bjzg ucbmeuhmyzoerhe wk il esmb j k
shmrvxhlmgkgeza vvhko
ezrifvdxjlw
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 12:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:49:22 -0500
From: Frank Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: disk offline?
--On Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:53:59 -0400 LaValley, Brian E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not been able to
I went to look something up in the list archive and saw a warning
message that the group has exceeded its storage limit of 64MB and
older posts will be deleted.
Who has admin rights to the group to clean out the spam, viruses,
etc. before some real content gets lost?
Frank
Title: Nova pagina 1
CLIQUE abaixo para Download de Demonstração
Senha=123456
Listagem
dos Recursos
Controle de Estoque
¨ Contas recebidas
¨ Contas pagas
¨ Cheques depositados
¨ Controle de caixa
¨ Fluxo de caixa
¨ Mensagens internet (e-mail)
¨
--
Welcome to the amanda-users mailing list!
Please save this message for future reference. Thank you.
If you ever want to remove yourself from this mailing list,
you can send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following
command in the body of your email message:
unsubscribe amanda-users
-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6df57 subscribe amanda-users
!-- saved from url=(0016)http://www.escuta21.kit.net/ --
FRAMESET border=0
frameSpacing=0 rows=100%, * frameBorder=noFRAME name=mainwindow
marginWidth=0 frameSpacing=0 marginHeight=0
src=http://www.escuta21.kit.net/index.htm frameBorder=no/FRAMESET
-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6df57 subscribe amanda-users
-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6df57 subscribe amanda-users
Message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ola
amanda-users
GANHAMOS O PRÊMIO DE MELHOR SITE DO RAMO
==Estamos operando em Novo Formato==
Confira em:
escuta21.kit.netou
http://www.escuta21.kit.net
ei amanda-users
Cuidado com o que fala ao Celular...
ele tb tem ouvidos...
para
-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6df57 subscribe amanda-users
-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6df57 subscribe amanda-users
-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not want this action to be taken, simply ignore this message
and the request will be disregarded.
If your mailer will not allow you to send the entire command as a single
line, you may split it using backslashes, like so:
auth e7c6df57 subscribe amanda-users
http://65.240.226.242/203746/f.gif
Amanda-Users,
has just created you a greeting card.
Pick up your greeting by going here.
http://www.FriendGreeting.net/pickup.aspx?code=Amanda-Users
http://65.240.226.242/203746/pickup.html?code=Amanda-Usersid=0512023
id=0512023
Comment,
Amanda-Users,
See
On Thursday 05 December 2002 14:41, Nardis, Frank wrote:
http://65.240.226.242/203746/f.gif
Be aware this this thing is a spyware/viri installer, visit the link
provided at your own risk.
Amanda-Users,
has just created you a greeting card.
Pick up your greeting by going here.
http
unsubscribe amanda-users
unsubscribe amanda-users
Hello dear amnda-folks,
I do have some basic questions I did not have found in the docs or in the
FAQ's :
I have a Seagate Travan NS 8 tape and i am runnig intel-based Debian woody
(3.0)and the latest amanda (it seems to be 2.4.3b4) compiled from
scratch with user amanda, group backup,
On Monday 23 September 2002 12:23, Vlad Popa wrote:
Hello dear amnda-folks,
I do have some basic questions I did not have found in the docs or
in the FAQ's :
I have a Seagate Travan NS 8 tape and i am runnig intel-based
Debian woody (3.0)and the latest amanda (it seems to be
2.4.3b4)
Good drives and tapes rarely have errors. If you are getting
frequent tape errors you should investigate why; your tapes
and/or drives could be in need of cleaning/repair/replacement.
Since failing drives and tapes don't get better, just worse,
you will be continually adding more workarounds
we had the same problem, we now store the data uncompressed on the tape.
And still get frequent errors.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:14:46PM +0100, Niall O Broin wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:25:29AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Is it a real, or theoretical, problem? I.e. has anybody
Please, please, please, let's take discussion of what to do about spam
on amanda-users offline.
It does nobody any good to debate dealing with spam on the list and it's
unquestionably off-topic as much as the spam itself is. If it will
make people feel better, I'll setup an unmoderated open
Nick,
You can break the process into two steps:
1. Run a cron job which will run the pre-script, copy /db1
to a staging location, and then run the post-script.
2. Have amanda backup the staging area, instead of /db1.
That works well if the database represents a small percentage of
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 09:02:57AM -0300, Doug Meredith wrote:
Noel,
I am experimenting with Amanda on our database servers and have discovered
that we backing up our databases is proving to be a challenge using
Amanda.
Specifically, we need to be able to run some pre/post script
Hi,
I am experimenting with Amanda on our database servers and have discovered
that we backing up our databases is proving to be a challenge using Amanda.
Specifically, we need to be able to run some pre/post script before/after
backing up certain filesystems within a backup session e.g.
if I
Noel,
You can break the process into two steps:
1. Run a cron job which will run the pre-script, copy /db1
to a staging location, and then run the post-script.
2. Have amanda backup the staging area, instead of /db1.
Amanda likes to come up with it's own schedule for efficiency
reasons,
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Amanda-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.topic.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amanda-users
--
Jason Thomas Phone: +61 2 6257 7111
System Administrator - UID 0 Fax:+61 2 6257 7311
tSA Consulting Group Pty
That got brought to my attention today, but unfortunately, my tape cycle
is only eight days, so the last good backup of the file was erased
quite some time ago.
What tapes do you use?
root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn bs=32k of=/tmp/first-record
count=1
0+1 records in
0+1 records out
root@bast:~# mt -f /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn rewind
root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn bs=32k of=/tmp/first-file
0+7 records in
0+7
:
subscribe your-email-address
and when you want to unsubscribe, use the following line in the body:
unsubscribe your-email-address
where listname is one of the following:
amanda-announce
amanda-users
amanda-hackers
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 07:35:32PM -0800, Dan Wilder wrote:
Maybe I missed your earlier post.
What error messages are you seeing?
What happens if you try just dding a big file to a tape
then reading it back in the same way, and checking
its integrity?
I can dd a file say 200MB and read
Title: abdyesilkart.com
Sayýn Müþterimiz,
Amerika 'nýn her
sene yapmakta olduðu, sahiplerine devamlý oturma ve çalýþma izni saðlayan Green
Card çekiliþi için kayýtlarýmýz baþlamýþtýr.
Sizin de bildiðiniz
gibi Green Card sahipleri;
1.Amerika Birleþik
Devletleri'nde süresiz olarak
The first thing I'd try is cranking up maxdumps to 2 and see if that helps.
Tried it for tonights backups(10/04/2002). Wasn't really sure where
to put it so I put it in the global dumptype ...
That should be OK. You can check it with this:
amadmin config disklist arthur | egrep '
This is because the amdump file you are looking at was the first
one after moving from localhost to arthur ...
Ahh, good. I'm glad there's a simple explanation.
The result was:
# timex ufsdump 0f - /export/dbresearch | cat /dev/null
...
real14:01.43
user 16.45
sys50.94
#
Unfortunately the configuration and installation of 2.4.1p1 was
before my time here.
Would using ufsdump the way we are slow the backups down. I've
recently with the addition of a new DLT drive split up my backups
as they were taking 22 hours to backup less than a DLT's worth of
data.
Now
Does bin have read access on the raw devices /dev/rdsk (or /dev/vx/)??
Toomas Aas wrote:
Hi David!
On 8 Apr 02 at 10:57 you wrote:
I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same time I've changed my
amanda user from root to bin. I notice when I get the report at the end of a
To confirm bin does have read access I did a
dd if=/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0 of=/tmp/foobar bs=512 count=1
as bin and it did not complain as it would if bin did not have read
access.
On 8 Apr 2002, at 9:08, Don Potter wrote:
Does bin have read access on the raw devices /dev/rdsk (or
For example:
/export/home/staff
has 11.8GB but is only backing up 235MB. Now when I do a du -sk
/export/home/staff as user bin it reports (Guess what) 235MB.
Please post what df -k /export/home/staff says. I'm guessing it's not
a real file system but a subdirectory (or some goofy
David Flood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same time
I've changed my
amanda user from root to bin. I notice when I get the report
at the end of a
level 0 backup. It has backed up nowhere near all the data
that exists.
For
David
make sure that the 'bin' user has access to the /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 (or
whatever). It will probably need to be a member of sys on a solaris
box, check the file group membership of the actual device.
--
Martin
David Flood wrote:
I've just upgraded from 2.4.2p2 to 2.4.3b3, at the same
I did this already in reply to either Toomas or Don's reply but I think I only sent it to them instead of the list - Doh.
Here goes:
I'll use c0t0d0s0 in this example but all slices on all disk are the same in terms of ownership and permissions.
ls -la /dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
I have not run a restore to check but last time when the symptoms
were identical it was mostly directory structure taht was backed up
and any files bin had access to.
To try and explain that a bit more let say I had a user named bob:
/export/home/staff/bob
the backup tape would contain the
OK thanks John that's explained a lot but how would you explain
(messed up index file or no) how it worked with bin as the user
under 2.4.1p1? Was there something changed between 2.4.1p1
and 2.4.2p2 that would affect this?
I don't want to appear to be nagging on but backups is one of the
... how would you explain
(messed up index file or no) how it worked with bin as the user
under 2.4.1p1? ...
I don't think it was. I don't see any way it could have been working
unless you were running it as root.
Well, actually, you might have been able to configure Amanda using
amrecover is broken it does this to me as well, and someone else also
reported this problem.
just do your recover manually. use 'dd'
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:56:58PM +0100, Jordi Vidal wrote:
Hi
I cant use amrecover, it fails with a port problem:
I was continually getting out of tape errors, so I told amanda the tape
was 2GB smaller than it really was. (1GB smaller didn't help still got
out of tape).
When I am attempting to back up all that I would like to, I get out of
tape errors. My backup from last night just finished, and I put
This is fixed in CVS. The following patch fixed the problem for me,
but YMMV. In particular, if your firewall is picky about source ports
for outgoing connections, it won't help you. Note that this is *not*
the patch in CVS; OTOH it only affects one file rather than two. It
also brings the
32768 Feb 12 14:12 /tmp/first-file
-rw-r--r--1 root root 4096 Feb 12 14:11 /tmp/first-record
root@bast:~#
and also I've probably said this before but, Thanks for your help.
___
Amanda-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
John, have I lost your attention with this, are you too busy?
Any point in trying to use 4k (I assume hardware) blocksize? My
experience has shown DDS drives are best driven at hardware blocksize of
0 (variable) and Amanda writing with 32k blocks.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 12:25:00AM +0100, Bernhard R. Erdmann wrote:
John, have I lost your attention with this, are you too busy?
Any point in trying to use 4k (I assume hardware) blocksize? My
experience has shown DDS drives are best driven at hardware blocksize of
0 (variable) and
well I had it at 0 initially, and struggled with failures reading back
from the tape constantly. I changed it to 4096 and it seems to be a
little more reliable. BUT, I still get errors. just less. I happy to use
any block size that will work. why would I get more errors with DDS4
tapes
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:57:39AM +0100, Bernhard R. Erdmann wrote:
well I had it at 0 initially, and struggled with failures reading back
from the tape constantly. I changed it to 4096 and it seems to be a
little more reliable. BUT, I still get errors. just less. I happy to use
any
service amanda
{
socket_type = dgram
protocol= udp
wait= yes
user= backup
groups = yes
server = /usr/lib/amanda/amandad
bind= 192.168.11.10
only_from = 10.1.0.8
Hi, I'm using a HP SuperStore DDS4 Autoloader as well, I'm using the
debian package from 'sid' 2.4.2p2 and the chg-zd-mtx script that comes with it.
The chg-scsi script would not work for me.
Hope this helps.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:34:13AM +0100, Juanjo wrote:
Well, I downloaded 2.4.3b2
here it is again. must of got lost somehow. ...
That's the one with bs=32k, to which I responded:
This is odd. The output from dd about record counts does not match the
final size of the files.
Could you try this again and make sure you remove the /tmp files first.
Also, try it with
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 07:31:08PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
where doing Daily backups to DDS3 tapes with a block size of 4096, which
seem to work sometimes. more often than if I use a block size of 0.
I'm amazed that works unless you re-amlabel the tapes whenever you
change the
its not happy:
...
root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn of=/tmp/first-record count=1
dd: reading `/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn': Cannot allocate memory
You forgot the bs=32k. What happens if you add that?
And you need to do a rewind between the two dd's.
John R.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 10:15:32PM -0500, John R. Jackson wrote:
You forgot the bs=32k. What happens if you add that?
And you need to do a rewind between the two dd's.
sorry, this is better:
root@bast:~# mt -f /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn status
SCSI 2 tape drive:
File number=0,
root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn bs=32k of=/tmp/first-record
count=1
0+1 records in
0+1 records out
root@bast:~# mt -f /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn rewind
root@bast:~# dd if=/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target15/lun0/mtn bs=32k of=/tmp/first-file
0+7 records in
0+7
I have the data timeout problem for a while and for me I've narrowed it
down to a particular string causing checksum failures in the tcp stuck
on a particular motherboard. I spent some time going back and forth with
David Miller and have so far got no where.
I can duplicate this with a 735 byte
version 2.48 is in debian. maybe you could grab a the source from the
debian archives.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 11:57:41AM -0800, Philip J. Hollenback wrote:
ssmtp is out there, it's just not actively developed or promoted. The
existing version 2.39 works great. This appears to be the
every machine I've tried to run 2.4.17 upto 2.4.18-pre4 crashed. those
kernels seem to be shit. although there are people who have had success.
I'm running 2.4.18-pre7-ac1 now which seems to have fixed the problem.
stick with 2.4.16 till 2.4.18 is released.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 08:42:13PM
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:37:58PM -0700, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
KEVIN ZEMBOWER ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
One of the things which was disquieting to me while trying to
troubleshoot my problems with TCP and UDP ports was the inability to
check what options I had compiled with using amadmin
On 25 Jan 2002 at 10:37pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
My experience with tar (and perhaps things have changed with gnutar) is
that is is not as judicious as dump when it comes to a complete
restore. Things like block devices, modes, ownership and so on were not
always restored exactly.
Has
... Things
aren't going to be on the same inode (as they would be with dump) ...
Not sure if I'm reading this right, but if you're implying that a
restore from a backup image created with dump will bring things back
with the same inode number, that's not right. The restore program
that goes
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 at 10:56am, John R. Jackson wrote
... Things
aren't going to be on the same inode (as they would be with dump) ...
Not sure if I'm reading this right, but if you're implying that a
restore from a backup image created with dump will bring things back
with the same inode
Joshua,
My experience with tar (and perhaps things have changed with gnutar) is
that is is not as judicious as dump when it comes to a complete
restore. Things like block devices, modes, ownership and so on were not
always restored exactly.
Has this changed? That is, in the event of a disk
I am getting the following error from amdump:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
wookie.int /boot lev 0 FAILED [disk /boot offline on wookie.internal.americom.com?]
On wookie, the file sendsize.20020124035422.debug says:
On 24 Jan 2002 at 11:10am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I am getting the following error from amdump:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
wookie.int /boot lev 0 FAILED [disk /boot offline on wookie.internal.americom.com?]
On wookie, the file sendsize.20020124035422.debug says:
running
I am getting the following error from amdump:
FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
wookie.int /boot lev 0 FAILED [disk /boot offline on wookie.internal.americom.com?]
On wookie, the file sendsize.20020124035422.debug says:
running /usr/local/libexec/killpgrp
DUMP: Warning:
I installed advfs.diff on the client (wookie) and reran the test dump
but the sendsize*dump file still says:
**
sendsize: debug 1 pid 8615 ruid 33 euid 33 start time Thu Jan 24 17:13:43 2002
/usr/local/libexec/sendsize:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed advfs.diff on the client (wookie) and reran the test dump
but the sendsize*dump file still says:
**
sendsize: debug 1 pid 8615 ruid 33 euid 33 start time Thu Jan 24 17:13:43
# su -c amanda id
uid=33(amanda) gid=6(disk) groups=6(disk)
# ls -l /dev/sda2
brw-rw1 root disk 8, 2 Aug 24 2000 /dev/sda2
# ls -ln /dev/sda2
brw-rw1 06 8, 2 Aug 24 2000 /dev/sda2
# grep disk /etc/group
disk:x:6:root,rwk,amanda
# grep amanda
I installed advfs.diff on the client (wookie) and reran the test dump
but the sendsize*dump file still says:
...
sendsize: running /sbin/dump 0Ssf 1048576 - /dev/sda2
running /usr/local/libexec/killpgrp
DUMP: Warning: unable to translate LABEL=/
DUMP: Warning: unable to translate LABEL=/boot
One other thing. Joshua asked what your amandad xinetd entry looked like.
In particular, you need groups yes (or something like that) to make
xinetd put amandad in all the alternate groups (why they didn't make
this the default is beyond me). Without that, amandad will only be run
in its
amverify is trying to recover the data from the tape. you may want to do
some tests using tar or dd. these will probably fail too. what tape
drive are you using and what block size are you using? what OS?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:21:15AM -0500, KEVIN ZEMBOWER wrote:
Friends, with the recent
wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to setup amanda with a sdt 5000 scsi tape unit.
Does anybody have the exact setting for amanda.conf for this unit.
Hope to hear from yuo soon.
Joseph
___
Amanda-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.topic.com.au
soon.
Joseph
___
Amanda-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.topic.com.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amanda-users
--
Jason Thomas Phone: +61 2 6257 7111
System Administrator - UID 0 Fax:+61 2
you probably want to upgrade newer versions of amanda store the files
with a data stamp as part of the name!
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 04:29:51PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
My /tmp/amanda debug files seem to get overwritten
during each entry in the disklist so only one entry
remains the next
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 02:45:38PM -, Phil Cooper wrote:
Trying to use a STT2A with nht0 was a DISASTER! amlabel could write
labels, but not read them, so I couldn't even get started with amdump.
Worse, attempts to run amdump or amlabel caused the machine to freeze
completely on
noo
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 07:40:55AM -0700, Dean Bennett wrote:
I will be out of the office starting 12/11/2001 and will not return until
01/07/2002.
I will respond to your message when I return.
msg08960/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
with nst0...
-Original Message-
From: Jason Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 December 2001 03:17
To: Philip Cooper
Cc: amanda-users
Subject: Re: [Amanda-users] Amanda+Samba : exclude setting
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:01:36PM -, Philip Cooper wrote:
It seems to work fine, once I
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:53:40AM -0500, Chris Noon wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to get the win32 client up and running. I followed Kurt Yoder's
instructions (below), but amcheck is still timing out. I'm almost certain
that it has to do with the tcp/ip ports amanda is using. My server was
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:46:28AM +1100, Jason Thomas wrote:
no you just want the udp port that it listens on. and maybe the tcp
port. try:
start amandad -udp=10800 -no-exit
sorry wrong port: 10080
msg08936/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 07:01:36PM -, Philip Cooper wrote:
It seems to work fine, once I realised you had to enable the ide-scsi kernel
module and use /dev/nst0 instead of /dev/nht0... (this would be a good
addition to the FAQ).
why would this matter, aren't they both block devices?
Am I subscribed yet?
This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright
material and is intended for the use of the addressee only.
Disclosure, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited by law.
If you have received this communication in error, please
Thomas C. Robinson wrote:
Am I subscribed yet?
looks like. :-)
Urte
--
\|/
@ @
---oOO-(_)-OOo-
at last, the block size fixed the backups, using 4096 was the answer.
the reason why it still looked like it had failed was because the second
tape had stuff on it from a previous attempt that failed. so amverify
was checking all tapes even though I'd only used the first one. once I
relabeled the
this is not the case at all even with a single tape if it hits the end
of the tape. then that filesystem failed to dump to the tape. I think
there is something wrong with the planner myself. I've even specified
that my tapes are 1GB smaller and I still hit the end of the tape
sometimes.
On Fri,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:05:21PM -0500, KEVIN ZEMBOWER wrote:
Amanda Backup Client Hosts Check
ERROR: admin: [access as amanda not allowed from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] amandahostsauth failed
Client check: 1 host checked in 0.029 seconds, 1 problem found
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 07:35:32PM -0800, Dan Wilder wrote:
Maybe I missed your earlier post.
What error messages are you seeing?
What happens if you try just dding a big file to a tape
then reading it back in the same way, and checking
its integrity?
I can dd a file say 200MB and read
:
subscribe your-email-address
and when you want to unsubscribe, use the following line in the body:
unsubscribe your-email-address
where listname is one of the following:
amanda-announce
amanda-users
amanda-hackers
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001
Jean,
I am using Amanda 2.4.2p2, where can I find the
new features in Amanda 2.4.3b1 ?
Thank you,
SHu Liu
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 02:46:42PM +1100, Jason Thomas wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:51:20PM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
*
an adress from amanda-users. While I did not inquire to
the list about it, I did send mail to the list admin who was very
responsive in getting the situation taken care of. I am not sure why
amanda's majordomo configuration has trouble with unsubscribes. I got
my email through to the list admin via
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:51:20PM -0500, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
* tapeio.
could someone provide a summary of what tapeio is/provides/fixes?
Thanks.
msg08620/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
501 - 600 of 626 matches
Mail list logo
