Re: Amanda 2.4.2p2, Solaris 8, amandad hangup

2001-10-23 Thread Brian Cuttler
Bernhard, We had successful backup of all systems except the 2.6 box last night, it was a file protection problem on the /usr/local/libexec directory (yassp over-tighened security for us). The 2.6 box no longer mounts the 2.8 system's /usr/local and instead has an installation of the previously

Re: Amanda 2.4.2p2, Solaris 8, amandad hangup

2001-10-22 Thread Brian Cuttler
) - From brian Thu Oct 18 10:06:04 2001 Subject: Amanda 2.4.2p2, Solaris 8, amandad hangup To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris Knight knight, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:06:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] Hello, I am trying to run amanda 2.4.2p2

Re: Amanda 2.4.2p2, Solaris 8, amandad hangup

2001-10-22 Thread Bernhard R. Erdmann
Unfortunately I've run into the other problem, inetd reporting a loop problem when I installed 2.4.2p2 (upgrade from 2.4.1p1) on a Solaris 2.6 client of the same server. Changing the inetd -r parameter did not resolve that issue for me so if anyone would has any ideas... Could you please

Re: Amanda 2.4.2p2, Solaris 8, amandad hangup

2001-10-22 Thread Bernhard R. Erdmann
I've run the amandad on the command line and from the errors I'm seeing believe the current problem stems from running a client built under 2.8 on a 2.6 system. I'm no Solaris expert but my feeling is this _will_ cause problems. [...] Don't have a functioning gcc under any of my 2.6 system,

Amanda 2.4.2p2, Solaris 8, amandad hangup

2001-10-18 Thread Brian Cuttler
Hello, I am trying to run amanda 2.4.2p2 on Solaris 8 and am receiving the following in /var/adm/messages Oct 18 09:22:28 c110 inetd[186]: [ID 858011 daemon.warning] /usr/local/libexec/amandad: Hangup Unlike the messages from May (30029 and related) I am not seeing a secondary message