On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:59:31 +
David Simpson wrote:
> Is there a definitive guide on backing up the catalogue/indexes?
>
> (ideally appending to tape as an epilogue of sorts)
Oddly enough, we've just been having a discussion related to this.
Start with Gene Heskett's email in your inbox:
On Monday 20 September 2021 11:59:31 David Simpson wrote:
> Is there a definitive guide on backing up the catalogue/indexes?
>
> (ideally appending to tape as an epilogue of sorts)
>
That is basicly what GenesAmandaHelper does.
If comfy with shell scripts there is an older version that will need
Is there a definitive guide on backing up the catalogue/indexes?
(ideally appending to tape as an epilogue of sorts)
-
David Simpson - Senior Systems Engineer
ARCCA, Redwood Building,
King Edward VII Avenue,
Cardiff, CF10 3NB
David Simpson - peiriannydd uwch systemau
ARCCA, Adeilad
I do too. I'm coming out of 'hibernation' to transfer some of our
unit-test-and-multi-OS-build code back out.
Installcheck seems to be breathing and useful for me too.
On 7/16/19 5:01 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Still believing in filing issues:
>
>
Still believing in filing issues:
https://github.com/zmanda/amanda/issues/109
LaBadie wrote:
>
> I sent the following note to Steve. I don't have facilities
> to check if my comments are correct. Anyone care to comment
> or check?
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> ...
>>
>> $ amrestore --c
I sent the following note to Steve. I don't have facilities
to check if my comments are correct. Anyone care to comment
or check?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
...
>
> $ amrestore --config abt -b 2097152 /dev/nst0 jupi smb_revision
>
> s
Am 24.06.19 um 22:06 schrieb Debra S Baddorf:
> You can also use “dd” to get the whole dump off tape. You would have to
> “glue” together
> any partial files; I don’t know how to do that (I’ve specified no partial
> files).
>
> “dd” still needs a reasonably correct block size.
thanks for
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 7:14 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>
> I stil have issues here:
>
> amrestore --config abt -b 2097152 /dev/nst0 jupi smb_revision
> Restoring from tape ABT-401 starting with file 1.
> amrestore: 1: skipping split dumpfile: date 2019060
I stil have issues here:
amrestore --config abt -b 2097152 /dev/nst0 jupi smb_revision
Restoring from tape ABT-401 starting with file 1.
amrestore: 1: skipping split dumpfile: date 20190607213002 host juno
disk vm182 part 1/UNKNOWN lev 0 comp N program /bin/tar
[..]
amrestore: 12
Am 19.06.19 um 19:30 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> I get
>
> $ amrestore --config abt /dev/nst0 jupi smb_revision
> ERROR: Error reading Amanda header: block size too small
>
> $ amrestore --config abt -b 32768 /dev/nst0 jupi smb_revision
> ERROR: Error reading A
I get
$ amrestore --config abt /dev/nst0 jupi smb_revision
ERROR: Error reading Amanda header: block size too small
$ amrestore --config abt -b 32768 /dev/nst0 jupi smb_revision
ERROR: Error reading Amanda header: block size too small
I don't have to say that I need these restores
* Jean-Louis Martineau <jmartin...@carbonite.com> [20160426 14:11]:
> You can't do that with amrestore.
>
> Use amfetchdump to do that.
OK!
I'm aware of amfetchdump. I was asking because I'm preparing an archive
to be shipped offsite for some people that don't have the archive's
Hi,
It's been a while since I played with low-level restore tool like
amrestore: is there a way to force amrestore to restore all the split
dumps matching a client name and DLE on a volume without first
extracting them one by one on disk and then concatenate them to recreate
a tar ball, ie doing
I’m pretty sure I tested an amrecover (not a whole amrestore) with my
setup, where the server does the encryption.
And it worked, I mean. Or I wouldn’t have continued.
I might only have tested an amrecover ON the server though, and not on the
client. Mine are all connected, so I
with amcrypt-ossl-asym) so I decided to review the
man page and saw:
***
Note
The Default values are those set at compile-time. Use amrestore to recover
client-encrypted or client-custom-compressed tapes.
***
Does this mean
) so I decided to review the man
page and saw:
***
Note
The Default values are those set at compile-time. Use amrestore to recover
client-encrypted or client-custom-compressed tapes.
***
Does this mean that for the sysadmin of a client to restore
. Use amrestore to
recover client-encrypted or client-custom-compressed tapes.
***
Does this mean that for the sysadmin of a client to restore files from
an encrypted backup, they can only use amrestore and not amrecover?
amrestore suggests (and I might be wrong
Hi,
We have an running amanda environment (Amanda-3.2.1) based on Ubuntu
11.10 backing up
some XEN hosts.
Last week we did a full disaster recovery test and run into some
problems using the
amrestore tool.
In our config we have:
define tapetype LTO-3 {
comment Created by amtapetype
Stefan,
The -b argument of amrestore is not working in 3.2.1
The attached patch was commited a long time ago to fix it.
Jean-Louis
On 12/03/2012 10:01 AM, Stefan Gustafsson wrote:
Hi,
We have an running amanda environment (Amanda-3.2.1) based on Ubuntu
11.10 backing up
some XEN hosts.
Last
Hello everybody,
since some time I've been testing amanda-3.3.0 but I'm still experiencing some
troubles with using amrestore.
First of all: Backups to virtual tapes do run fine and extracting backups via
dd if=/backup/tapepools/DailySet/DailySet-15/00010.MYCLIENT._var_lib_amanda.0
bs=32k
retrieved data for the same client/DLE
from the LTO5 but am having a problem with the retireival
from the LTO4.
# amrestore /dev/rmt/3n mailserv /usr1
ufsrestore -tf mailserv._usr1.20110418183000.0.001
bad filesystem block size 1536
Same command, with only a change in the tape-device name
from the LTO4.
# amrestore /dev/rmt/3n mailserv /usr1
ufsrestore -tf mailserv._usr1.20110418183000.0.001
bad filesystem block size 1536
Same command, with only a change in the tape-device name,
worked correctly retreiving from the LTO5 drive.
Since I did not specify an amanda
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
Which amanda version are you using? There was a bug with 'amrestore -p' which
is already fixed.
3.2.1
Jean-Louis
lxnf9...@comcast.net wrote:
I use amcrypt-ossl for backups
No problems using amrecover to restore
In the past I have used
I use amcrypt-ossl for backups
No problems using amrecover to restore
In the past I have used amrestore -p /dev/nst1 no-such-host /dev/null
to read a tape and get a list when the index was lost
That does not seem to work
I get Restoring from tape week02 starting with file 1. and nothing else
I
Hello...
amanda 3.2.0 on Ubuntu 10.04 32bit in an Amazon EC2 instance
I seem to be running into a bug when restoring data from a S3 vtape
bucket. amrestore -p | restore -iovf - always fails. running
amrestore without -p works, but produces a ERROR: /bin/gzip exited with
status 2
a note to test it before the release.
I suspect something in amrestore does not like the 'part X/Y' text. I
looked at the source, but nothing jumped out at me as the cause.
Your first case, of amrestore trucking right on after finding the dump
it was looking for, is expected behavior - amrestore
;)
We're working on that. In fact, I think it should be doable in 3.1.
I'll make a note to test it before the release.
yea!
I suspect something in amrestore does not like the 'part X/Y' text. I
looked at the source, but nothing jumped out at me as the cause.
Your first case, of amrestore
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Christopher chris...@pricegrabber.com wrote:
Was it always that way? I haven't used amrestore since amfetchdump came
out.
Yes. Or, if not, it was a bug :)
I'll spend some time tracking down exactly what is not being stripped
out. Maybe stderr is being
Dustin, et al,
Periodically while I'm performing a restore with # amrestore
the cronjob # amcheck grabs and swaps out the tape on me.
Is there a way to interlock these two jobs so that doesn't happen ?
For my money, I guess, amcheck failing would be the prefered
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Periodically while I'm performing a restore with # amrestore
the cronjob # amcheck grabs and swaps out the tape on me.
Is there a way to interlock these two jobs so that doesn't happen ?
For my money, I guess, amcheck
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:08:01PM -0600, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
Periodically while I'm performing a restore with # amrestore
the cronjob # amcheck grabs and swaps out the tape on me.
Is there a way to interlock
Try amfetchdump instead of amrestore.
Jean-Louis
Brian Cuttler wrote:
Dustin, et al,
Periodically while I'm performing a restore with # amrestore
the cronjob # amcheck grabs and swaps out the tape on me.
Is there a way to interlock these two jobs so that doesn't happen ?
For my money, I
try to run amrestore I get:
/usr/sbin/amrestore -p -h /dev/nst0 ...
amrestore: Error reading volume label: Can't open tape device /dev/nst0:
Read-only file system.
Why does amrestore want to write to the tape?
From my answer to Ian 45 minutes ago:
This has been fixed in trunk. Here's
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Darin Perusich wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Darin Perusich
darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote:
Why does 'amrestore' always rewind the tape when I go to restore
something? This is something I just started
On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Darin Perusich wrote:
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Darin Perusich wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Darin Perusich
darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote:
Why does 'amrestore' always rewind the tape when I go to restore
Why does 'amrestore' always rewind the tape when I go to restore
something? This is something I just started seeing after upgrading to
2.6.x, it wasn't happening with previous versions, 2.5.2. The man page
says I can use '-f #' to fast forward the tape to a specific mark but
when I've already done
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Darin Perusich
darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote:
Why does 'amrestore' always rewind the tape when I go to restore
something? This is something I just started seeing after upgrading to
2.6.x, it wasn't happening with previous
property to the tape device.
I'm not sure how accurately varoius operating systems can determine
the current file, though, so this might be a dangerous property. It's
also currently very difficult to supply properties via amrestore,
since it doesn't have a configuration file.
Dustin
--
Open Source
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Darin Perusich wrote:
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Darin Perusich
darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote:
Why does 'amrestore' always rewind the tape when I go to restore
something? This is something I just started seeing after upgrading
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Darin Perusich
darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com wrote:
Why does 'amrestore' always rewind the tape when I go to restore
something? This is something I just started seeing after upgrading to
2.6.x, it wasn't happening with previous versions, 2.5.2. The man page
Hello,
Server and client are 2.5.1p1 on debian etch
I've been trying to use amrestore but the backup is around 250Go
splitted over 5 tapes and I'm not successful so far. amrestore is
restoring the fileset using 10M size files.
Problem is amrestore doesn't close 10M files it already restored
It is easier to restore a splitted dump with amfetchdump. It will write
a 250Go file.
There is no way to automatically rebuild index from tape.
Jean-Louis
Franck GANACHAUD wrote:
Hello,
Server and client are 2.5.1p1 on debian etch
I've been trying to use amrestore but the backup is around
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Franck GANACHAUD
franck.ganach...@altran.com wrote:
I've been trying to use amrestore but the backup is around 250Go splitted
over 5 tapes and I'm not successful so far. amrestore is restoring the
fileset using 10M size files.
First, you should be using a much
-Louis
Franck GANACHAUD wrote:
Hello,
Server and client are 2.5.1p1 on debian etch
I've been trying to use amrestore but the backup is around 250Go
splitted over 5 tapes and I'm not successful so far. amrestore is
restoring the fileset using 10M size files.
Problem is amrestore doesn't close 10M
to restore a splitted dump with amfetchdump. It will
write a 250Go file.
There is no way to automatically rebuild index from tape.
Jean-Louis
Franck GANACHAUD wrote:
Hello,
Server and client are 2.5.1p1 on debian etch
I've been trying to use amrestore but the backup is around 250Go
splitted
Running amanda-client-1:2.5.2p1-3--i386 on the client, Ubuntu 8.10,
and amanda-server-1:2.5.2p1-1--i386 on the server, Ubuntu
8.04. Everything is, as much as possible, stock.
I have never tried to restore from this client before. Backups appear
to be sucessful.
Charles Curley wrote at 08:29 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
r...@dragon:/home/ccurley/projects/ror# amrecover -C /etc/amanda/DailySet1
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.2p1. Contacting server on localhost ...
NAK: user root from localhost is not allowed to execute the service
amindexd: Please add amindexd
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:11:38AM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Charles Curley wrote at 08:29 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
r...@dragon:/home/ccurley/projects/ror# amrecover -C /etc/amanda/DailySet1
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.2p1. Contacting server on localhost ...
NAK: user root from localhost is not
Charles Curley wrote at 11:48 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:11:38AM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Charles Curley wrote at 08:29 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
r...@dragon:/home/ccurley/projects/ror# amrecover -C
/etc/amanda/DailySet1
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.2p1. Contacting
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:50:50PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Do you know how your stock ubuntu build of amanda was configured (the
args to configure)?
I just noticed that the request came from 'localhost' which does
not match your .amandahosts entry.
Short of pulling in the source package
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 02:18:27PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:50:50PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Do you know how your stock ubuntu build of amanda was configured (the
args to configure)?
I just noticed that the request came from 'localhost' which does
not
Charles Curley wrote at 16:53 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 02:18:27PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:50:50PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Do you know how your stock ubuntu build of amanda was configured (the
args to configure)?
I just
John Hein wrote at 17:49 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
man amrecover (see -s -t). I don't know if there is a run-time
configuration option for these (I didn't see one after a quick read
of the man pages) - if so, -o would be of no help.
^^^ s/so/not/
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:49:20PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Charles Curley wrote at 16:53 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 02:18:27PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:50:50PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Do you know how your stock ubuntu build of amanda
Charles Curley wrote at 18:54 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:49:20PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
man amrecover (see -s -t). I don't know if there is a run-time
configuration option for these (I didn't see one after a quick read
of the man pages) - if so, -o would be of
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 07:28:32PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
Charles Curley wrote at 18:54 -0700 on Mar 1, 2009:
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:49:20PM -0700, John Hein wrote:
man amrecover (see -s -t). I don't know if there is a run-time
configuration option for these (I didn't see one
Hi
Can anyone tell me how to use amrestore i have done
amrestore tapefile host
now i have a big file which i cant open
how do i extract the files there
+--
|This was sent by mahmoudh...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward
ay4you schrieb:
Can anyone tell me how to use amrestore i have done
amrestore tapefile host
now i have a big file which i cant open
how do i extract the files there
Why you want to use amrestore and not amrecover?
# man amrecover
Regards
Marc
--
Marc Muehlfeld (Leitung IT)
Zentrum fuer
i want to restore because the server was rebuilt and amrecover is not reading
the old backups i took only the new ones i havnt had any luck with amrecover so
i want to try amrestore
+--
|This was sent by mahmoudh...@gmail.com
Why you can't open the file?
Jean-Louis
ay4you wrote:
Hi
Can anyone tell me how to use amrestore i have done
amrestore tapefile host
now i have a big file which i cant open
how do i extract the files
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:03:21PM -0500, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
I'm sorry -- I somehow filed this away withot answering.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
read(4, 0x080887A0, 32768) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Err#5 EIO
...
Note that the actions Amanda
was able to run a restore on DLT drive
on solaris 10/Sparc, so I'm thinking me rather than architecture
(that is solaris sparc v x86, not Amanda architecture), but I don't
know for sure.
Target file system is ZFS produced with snapshots, but again, parallel
config with the Sparc system.
# amrestore /dev
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Brian Cuttler br...@wadsworth.org wrote:
amdevchec liked the drive, and amlabel and amcheck report
success when labeling or checking it.
Sorry, I didn't mean to reply privately in my last message. Anyway,
can you try running the amrestore under 'truss' to see
.
# amrestore /dev/rmt/0hn
Restoring from tape Curie01 starting with file 1.
amrestore: 1: restoring FILE: date 20090223143428 host curie disk /thump lev
1 comp .gz program APPLICATION
Could not seek device /dev/rmt/0hn to file 2: Error reading Amanda header.
---
Brian R Cuttler
... you still must use amfetchdump -b 256k when doing a recovery.
from man amfetchdump
-b blocksize
Force a particular block size when reading from tapes. This value
will usually be autodetected, and should not normally need to be
set.
( same with amrestore )
3: ( for me at least
[EMAIL PROTECTED] amrestore -r /dev/nst0 hostname /foo/bar
This will uncompress your dumps, which are probably gzipped, and that
takes CPU and more disk bandwidth to write. If they are compressed,
give '-c' to amrestore to leave them alone.
(IMHO amrestore should default to not changing
On Dec 22, 2007 2:20 PM, Greg Troxel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] amrestore -r /dev/nst0 hostname /foo/bar
This will uncompress your dumps, which are probably gzipped, and that
takes CPU and more disk bandwidth to write. If they are compressed,
give '-c' to amrestore to leave
). But,
my reads seem to hover around 5.5MB/s. I ran some dd tests, which show
the data being pulled off at 11.7MB/s, and I'm not quite sure how to
tell what amrestore is doing that is causing the performance drop off.
Here are the tests I ran; any help is appreciated.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dd
Jeremy,
If I can make the process more efficient, then that's what I want to
do. In the event of a catastrophe, time is money.
I have tracked down what I believe to be a bug; that is, if no blocksize
is defined for amrestore, it defaults to 32K, even though the man page
says Amrestore
It seems that changing the blocksize with mt -f /dev/nst0 setblk
to anything other than what it defaulted to breaks things; I get errors
much like the following:
18:06:39 read(3, 0x2b1a7dead010, 262144) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
18:06:52 write(2, amrestore: error reading file he
tcp nowait amanda /opt/amanda/client/libexec/amidxtaped
amidxtaped # Amanda
Any thoughts?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Krahn, Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:07 PM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: amrestore
*Subject:* amrestore
After running a amdump , I was trying to get amrecover to work on one
of the clients.
On the server prdapp16.
I modified the .amandahosts file
cat /home/amanda/.amandahosts
prdapp16.transora.com root amindexd amidxtaped
qaapp01-bkup.1sync.org root amindexd amidxtaped
Hello,
Just a question: in the amrestore page from amanda 2.4.4p3 (well, packaged by
Red Hat for RHEL 4.x), it says that amrestore does NOT use a tape changer.
Too bad, because in one of our configurations, we use a tape changer with 6
tapes, four of which are dedicated to a configuration
Le jeudi 13 septembre 2007, vous avez écrit :
[...]
That's still the case with amrestore, which is considered the
bare-metal recovery tool of the three currently available. In the
copy of 2.4.4p1 I have available, amfetchdump does not exist, but that
tool is able to use a changer to fetch
On 9/13/07, Francis Galiegue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One question though: is it really the role of amrecover to drive the tape
changer? Isn't that done on the server side? What if I decide to upgrade the
server to the latest 2.5.x but leave clients with 2.4.x?
Yes, that's correct -- I was
Hi,
first i will use amoldrecover for recover ;-)
why didn´t i remember this before...
Thats not solving the problem, but it is a work arround.
This afternoon i will leave to vacation.
Will work on this at a later time.
Thanks for help.
bye
B²
Bjoern B schrieb:
Hi,
Jean-Louis Martineau
Hi,
Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb:
The only way to get this error is if amandad doesn't get amindexd as
argument.
But it is listed in the server_args of /etc/xinetd.d/amanda
You should recheck that file, verify that it doesn't have character you
don't see.
I have retyped the server_args in
Hi,
Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb:
Frank Smith wrote:
amandad: time 0.000: amindexd: invalid service
amandad: time 0.000: sending NAK pkt:
ERROR amindexd: invalid service
My interpretation of this error is that it couldn't find the service
named amindexd. Is this something new in 2.5,
Can you upgrade to 2.5.2p1?
Jean-Louis
Bjoern B wrote:
Hi,
Jean-Louis Martineau schrieb:
The only way to get this error is if amandad doesn't get amindexd
as argument.
But it is listed in the server_args of /etc/xinetd.d/amanda
You should recheck that file, verify that it doesn't have
There is no Problem with Backup to and restore from Amandaserver1 and 2
and the long time ago configured clients.
With Amandaserver3 i could backup different clients, mostly Linux and
one Windows.
Amcheck and amdump are successfull.
We could make a successfully amrestore from Amandaserver3 OS
amrestore doesn't use the network and can't fail with NAK: amindexd:
invalid service.
amrestore and amrecover are two distinct commands, don't say amrestore
when you talk about amrecover, it's really confusing.
Your config looks good, are you sure you restarted xinetd?
amrecover in 2.4
backup different clients, mostly Linux and
one Windows.
Amcheck and amdump are successfull.
We could make a successfully amrestore from Amandaserver3 OS CENTOS
with AMRECOVER Version 2.4.4p3.
But we can´t do an amrestore from Debian boxes with AMRECOVER Version
2.5.1p1 to Amandaserver3.
I
could backup different clients, mostly Linux and
one Windows.
Amcheck and amdump are successfull.
We could make a successfully amrestore from Amandaserver3 OS CENTOS
with AMRECOVER Version 2.4.4p3.
But we can´t do an amrestore from Debian boxes with AMRECOVER Version
2.5.1p1
The only way to get this error is if amandad doesn't get amindexd as
argument.
But it is listed in the server_args of /etc/xinetd.d/amanda
You should recheck that file, verify that it doesn't have character you
don't see.
Verify that you doesn't have an amandad process already running.
Frank Smith wrote:
amandad: time 0.000: amindexd: invalid service
amandad: time 0.000: sending NAK pkt:
ERROR amindexd: invalid service
My interpretation of this error is that it couldn't find the service
named amindexd. Is this something new in 2.5, as in 2.4 it was named
amandaidx,
On Saturday 05 May 2007 09:13, Donofrio, Lewis wrote:
Do I still have to use another tty to change tapes with amanda 2.5.x?
Amrestore only supports one tape at a time, so you can change tapes with the
same TTY.
Amrecover and amfetchdump know how to use the changer now, so you don't need
Do I still have to use another tty to change tapes with amanda 2.5.x?
__
Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: (734) 323-8776
tape into the active slot of
the changer. But when i do amrestore /dev/nst0 lollipop /files1
I get
this:
amrestore: missing file header block
amrestore: 2: skipping zoo._.20070419.1.1
amrestore: missing file header block
amrestore: 6: skipping marlin._var.20070419.1.1
I am trying to restore a folder from a tape in a previous cycle (last
night had a level 0 of the disk, but the folder was deleted prior). I
have a tape changer and read that amrestore doesnt work with tape
changers. My dumptypes are gnutar, so I probably can't use amrecover. Is
this correct
actually, i found how to put the desired tape into the active slot of
the changer. But when i do amrestore /dev/nst0 lollipop /files1 I get
this:
amrestore: missing file header block
amrestore: 2: skipping zoo._.20070419.1.1
amrestore: missing file header block
amrestore: 6: skipping
I am trying to use amrecover with with directory names in the disklist
file which
contain spaces. Having no joy, e.g. with a test setup:
% cat disklist
myhost /opt/test directorycomp-user-tar
% amrecover testset
AMRECOVER Version 2.5.1p3. Contacting server on myhost
Michael Keightley schrieb:
I am trying to use amrecover with with directory names in the disklist
file which
contain spaces. Having no joy, e.g. with a test setup:
% cat disklist
myhost /opt/test directorycomp-user-tar
% amrecover testset
AMRECOVER Version
Michael Keightley schrieb:
Any idea how to fix this? Problem is lots of Windows folders that we want
to add to the disklist contain spaces.
Additional thought:
Read man amanda, section DISKLIST FILE.
You could use disknames without spaces, like in
amclient mydiskname /opt/test directory
Tried this already:
amrecover setdisk /opt/test\ directory
501 Disk myhost:\/opt/test\\ directory\ is not in your disklist.
Michael
On 26/04/07, Stefan G. Weichinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Keightley schrieb:
I am trying to use amrecover with with directory names in the disklist
Michael,
This bug is already fix in the latest 2.5.1p3 snapshot.
You can download it from http://www.zmanda.com/community-builds.php
The snapshot have many bugs fixed since the release of 2.5.1p3.
Jean-Louis
Michael Keightley wrote:
I am trying to use amrecover with with directory names in
Downloaded an compiled amanda-2.5.1p3-20070420
Fixed the problem.
Thanks,
Michael
On 26/04/07, Jean-Louis Martineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael,
This bug is already fix in the latest 2.5.1p3 snapshot.
You can download it from http://www.zmanda.com/community-builds.php
The snapshot have
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:23:56PM -0400, Nick Brockner wrote:
Hi All.
I am new to amanda, and maybe I just don't understand how it works, but
here is my problem:
I have a remote machine that I back up over my network. The backups and
everything go fine. I am doing
Hi All.
I am new to amanda, and maybe I just don't understand how it works, but
here is my problem:
I have a remote machine that I back up over my network. The backups and
everything go fine. I am doing a disaster recovery test today, and it
went all wrong. Very, very wrong. I have a
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:23:56PM -0400, Nick Brockner wrote:
Hi All.
I am new to amanda, and maybe I just don't understand how it works, but
here is my problem:
I have a remote machine that I back up over my network. The backups and
everything go fine. I am doing a disaster recovery
1 - 100 of 435 matches
Mail list logo
