Re: Bacula --> Amanda migration

2011-03-03 Thread Gour
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 09:48:22 -0700 John Hein wrote: > Amanda should not have problems. If you hit a snag, ask the list. Cool. > You may hit issues like the mt(1) syntax is different (use mt for > things like setting blocksize and disabling hardware compression > before amanda starts up). That'

Re: Bacula --> Amanda migration

2011-03-03 Thread Gour
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 11:00:01 -0500 Chris Hoogendyk wrote: > I saw almost exactly the same question on the Bacula list recently, > with respect to migrating from netbackup to Bacula. The short answer > was that there is no way except recovering and then backing up with > the new backup program. :

Re: Bacula --> Amanda migration

2011-03-03 Thread John Hein
Gour wrote at 16:23 +0100 on Mar 3, 2011: > Is there any concern when migrating Amanda from Linux to FreeBSD? Amanda should not have problems. If you hit a snag, ask the list. You may hit issues like the mt(1) syntax is different (use mt for things like setting blocksize and disabling hardware

Re: Bacula --> Amanda migration

2011-03-03 Thread Chris Hoogendyk
ng more hardware) seems to be to remove one disk from raid1 array and used it along with the other disks to restore everything on those and then backup? Let me add that video files (8 tapes) are stored in separate catalog then the slides, iow. they use different pools of tapes. Any idea how t

Bacula --> Amanda migration

2011-03-03 Thread Gour
sed it along with the other disks to restore everything on those and then backup? Let me add that video files (8 tapes) are stored in separate catalog then the slides, iow. they use different pools of tapes. Any idea how to do this Bacula --> Amanda migration in a most simple way? Is there an