On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 03:42:32PM -0500, Bryan Hodgson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:11:00PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:01:36AM -0500, Bryan Hodgson wrote:
One day next week I want to prevent any level 0 dumps, and run only
incrementals for that one
There is a planner bug with force-bump when a dle is overdue.
The attached patch should fix it.
As a workaround, you can set a large dumpcycle (eg. 1).
force-bump will prevent full, but it will also bump the level, this
might not be what you want.
Setting a large dumpcycle and a small
One day next week I want to prevent any level 0 dumps, and run only
incrementals for that one night.
It's not obvious to me from the docs that 'amadmin force bump' will
actually prevent amanda from concluding that it's time for a level
0. Would 'force bump' serve my purpose? (My guess = no.)
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:01:36AM -0500, Bryan Hodgson wrote:
One day next week I want to prevent any level 0 dumps, and run only
incrementals for that one night.
It's not obvious to me from the docs that 'amadmin force bump' will
actually prevent amanda from concluding that it's time for
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 01:11:00PM -0500, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:01:36AM -0500, Bryan Hodgson wrote:
One day next week I want to prevent any level 0 dumps, and run only
incrementals for that one night.
It's not obvious to me from the docs that 'amadmin force
