Title: RE: Wait for dumping
Resend, with unforgivable typos corrected.
-Original Message-
From: John R. Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 9/21/2005 10:35 PM
To: Lengyel, Florian
Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Wait for dumping
>mt -f /dev/nst0 compression
Title: RE: Wait for dumping
-Original Message-
From: John R. Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 9/21/2005 10:35 PM
To: Lengyel, Florian
Cc: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Wait for dumping
>mt -f /dev/nst0 compression off
>
>[by the way, the argument
>mt -f /dev/nst0 compression off
>
>[by the way, the argument "off" is worth a small fortune in
>consulting fees, since it has to be guessed]
Yeah, I've been down that path, too. In my case, I wanted to turn
compression *on* and absolutely nothing I tried worked. And you're
absolutely right that
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 06:25:49PM -0400, Gene Heskett enlightened us:
> But, if using Centos, are you using their often outdated amanda rpms,
> or building amanda from scratch, which is what the huge majority of us
> recommend. Other than using the FILE driver now instead of the TAPE
> driver, I'
On Sunday 18 September 2005 12:27, Florian Lengyel wrote:
>Jon LaBadie wrote:
>>On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 11:25:48PM -0400, Florian Lengyel wrote:
>>>Here's the post-mortem: I've been using a hand-me-dowm
>>>Spectra Logic 2K. No matter what tape I tried in drive 0
>>>(the only one of two that my AMAN
Florian Lengyel wrote:
> PS. In view of the recent complaints on this list about the AMANDA
> documentation, for lack of any specific citation I must take the
> opportunity to disagree. The documentation is intelligible to anyone who
> takes the trouble to read it.
I am very happy to hear that,
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 11:25:48PM -0400, Florian Lengyel wrote:
Here's the post-mortem: I've been using a hand-me-dowm
Spectra Logic 2K. No matter what tape I tried in drive 0
(the only one of two that my AMANDA configuration seems
to recognize) I had I/O errors. Even an
On Sunday 18 September 2005 02:03, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 11:25:48PM -0400, Florian Lengyel wrote:
>> Here's the post-mortem: I've been using a hand-me-dowm
>> Spectra Logic 2K. No matter what tape I tried in drive 0
>> (the only one of two that my AMANDA configuration seems
>>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 11:25:48PM -0400, Florian Lengyel wrote:
> Here's the post-mortem: I've been using a hand-me-dowm
> Spectra Logic 2K. No matter what tape I tried in drive 0
> (the only one of two that my AMANDA configuration seems
> to recognize) I had I/O errors. Even an innocuous command
Here's the post-mortem: I've been using a hand-me-dowm
Spectra Logic 2K. No matter what tape I tried in drive 0
(the only one of two that my AMANDA configuration seems
to recognize) I had I/O errors. Even an innocuous command such as
mt -f /dev/nst0 compression off
[by the way, the argument "off
Title: RE: Wait for dumping
Well, in that case, I'll check slot 11...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jon LaBadie
Sent: Fri 9/16/2005 1:55 AM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Wait for dumping
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:09:16AM -0400, Le
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:09:16AM -0400, Lengyel, Florian wrote:
>
> What does amcheck say about the tape it expects to use?
>
> It says the following:
>
...
> amcheck-server: slot 11: tape_rdlabel: tape open:
> /dev/nst0: Input/output error
>
> amcheck-server: fatal slot 11:
> Unl
--On Friday, September 16, 2005 01:09:16 -0400 "Lengyel, Florian" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jon LaBadie
> Sent: Fri 9/16/2005 12:34 AM
> To: amanda-users@amanda.org
> Subject: Re: Wait for dumping
Title: RE: Wait for dumping
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jon LaBadie
Sent: Fri 9/16/2005 12:34 AM
To: amanda-users@amanda.org
Subject: Re: Wait for dumping
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:51:31PM -0400, Lengyel, Florian wrote:
> A check of the log shows t
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:51:31PM -0400, Lengyel, Florian wrote:
> A check of the log shows that the taper is complaining that a new tape
> isn't in the rack! But there are plenty of tapes (30)...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daily]$ more log.20050915.4
> START driver date 20050915
> DISK planner cml10
Title: RE: Wait for dumping
A check of the log shows that the taper is complaining that a new tape
isn't in the rack! But there are plenty of tapes (30)...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Daily]$ more log.20050915.4
START driver date 20050915
DISK planner cml10 /home/moodle
DISK planner m254.gc.cun
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
I've got some improvements, i tried to compile amanda again and specify
more range for tcpportrange and udpportrange. The reason why my dumping
got those errors is that, my firewalls didn't allow the other ports that
amanda uses when dumping since i got so many hosts to bac
Toomas Aas wrote:
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
another question, why does amstatus reports that some dumps are not
successful and giving this reasons:
0 driver: (aborted:could not connect to data port: Connection
timed out)(too many dumper retry)
1 driver: (aborted:[request timeout])(too ma
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
another question, why does amstatus reports that some dumps are not
successful and giving this reasons:
0 driver: (aborted:could not connect to data port: Connection
timed out)(too many dumper retry)
1 driver: (aborted:[request timeout])(too many dumper retry)
bu
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:13:13PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:23:21PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
> >>Guys,
> >> Who will be the responsible for the dump when the amanda said that
> >>the host's status is "wait for dumping"?
> >If I understand cor
Ryan Pagquil wrote:
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:23:21PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
Guys,
Who will be the responsible for the dump when the amanda said that
the host's status is "wait for dumping"?
If I understand correctly, you started a dump and while it was r
Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:23:21PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
Guys,
Who will be the responsible for the dump when the amanda said that
the host's status is "wait for dumping"?
If I understand correctly, you started a dump and while it was running
you ran amstat
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:23:21PM +0800, Ryan Pagquil wrote:
> Guys,
>Who will be the responsible for the dump when the amanda said that
> the host's status is "wait for dumping"?
>
If I understand correctly, you started a dump and while it was running
you ran amstatus. The report from ams
23 matches
Mail list logo
