feature request: mt offl after amdump

I am currently rewriting my cronjobs to systemd-units and -timers ... and I do that as well for the daily run of amdump. Works fine so far. my question: It is rather easy to do a "mt -f /dev/st0 offl" after a successful amdump, if there is only one tape-device. I currently use 2 LTO-2 drives w

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Am 29.06.2014 23:27, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > I am currently rewriting my cronjobs to systemd-units and -timers ... > and I do that as well for the daily run of amdump. > > Works fine so far. > > my question: > > It is rather easy to do a "mt -f /dev/st0 offl" after a successful > amdu

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Stefan, This feature is already committed for the next major release (3.4). Jean-Louis On 06/29/2014 05:27 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: I am currently rewriting my cronjobs to systemd-units and -timers ... and I do that as well for the daily run of amdump. Works fine so far. my question:

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Am 02.07.2014 21:56, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: > Stefan, > > This feature is already committed for the next major release (3.4). Wow, I love to hear that! I assume you could provide a link to the commit? I'd like to see what you implemented (and maybe comment on that :-) ). Thanks, regards

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Better news, it's already in 3.3.1 Check for the eject-volume setting. Jean-Louis On 07/02/2014 03:58 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Am 02.07.2014 21:56, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: Stefan, This feature is already committed for the next major release (3.4). Wow, I love to hear that! I as

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Am 02.07.2014 22:10, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: > Better news, it's already in 3.3.1 > Check for the eject-volume setting. pardon? I have 3.3.5 here already. Looking fwd!

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Am 02.07.2014 22:12, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > Am 02.07.2014 22:10, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: >> Better news, it's already in 3.3.1 >> Check for the eject-volume setting. > > pardon? I have 3.3.5 here already. > > Looking fwd! JL, pls provide me what to checkout with svn. I can't find

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Stefan, If you have 3.3.5 $ man amanda.conf eject-volume bool Default: no. Set to yes if you want the volume to be ejected after Amanda wrote data to it. It works only with some changer and device. Add the following to amanda.conf: eject-volume yes I

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Am 03.07.2014 14:27, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: > Stefan, > > If you have 3.3.5 > > $ man amanda.conf >eject-volume bool >Default: no. Set to yes if you want the volume to be ejected > after >Amanda wrote data to it. It works only with some changer and >

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

On 07/03/2014 08:33 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Am 03.07.2014 14:27, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: Stefan, If you have 3.3.5 $ man amanda.conf eject-volume bool Default: no. Set to yes if you want the volume to be ejected after Amanda wrote data to it. It wo

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Am 03.07.2014 14:52, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: > Read download.php, it tell how to use svn or git. > Follow the link for the development branch in the table, it tell you how > to checkout. ... sorry, my fault, didn't scroll enough. Thanks, Stefan

Re: feature request: mt offl after amdump

Am 03.07.2014 14:33, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > Am 03.07.2014 14:27, schrieb Jean-Louis Martineau: >> Stefan, >> >> If you have 3.3.5 >> >> $ man amanda.conf >>eject-volume bool >>Default: no. Set to yes if you want the volume to be ejected >> after >>Amanda wro