>What values are people using for bumpsize, bumdays, bumpmult other than
>the example values?
I don't think this applies to you, but the only place I've changed the
bump* parameters was on a system that had a dumpcycle < 10 days (i.e.
so I would not run out of level numbers) and I wanted to bump
Hi all,
What values are people using for bumpsize, bumdays, bumpmult other than
the example values?
I have a lot of > 10 GB disks to back up and it doesn't seem efficient
to me to do eg. an 11 GB "level 5" backup of a disk that has 13 GB of
data on it--In that situation, I think it would probabl
Wow, I think that's it. I made a backup user with "Read-only" permissions on all
of the NT machines. Yay! I'm off to change a bunch of backup user setting on a
bunch of people's NT boxes now Thanks!
--- Eric
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2000, Eric Wadsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Dec 5, 2000, Eric Wadsworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amanda has now run 4 times on my network. The past three times it
> has included samba shares for various NT workstations. Why are the
> incrementals so huge on these?
One of the possible reasons: if the username with which you access
Hi,
Amanda has now run 4 times on my network. The past three times it has included
samba shares for various NT workstations. Why are the incrementals so huge on
these? Relevant information follows. --- Eric
Here are lines of three consecutive reports for one share:
Dumper Stats
