Mark Martinec wrote:
M. Lewis,
I want all of my spam to be passed (and tagged).
I have a need to send that spam to a different address as well.
If 'a different address' is the same for all recipients,
this is a traditional case of quarantining to a mailbox,
see amavisd.conf-sample, use quar
--- Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> > I released an item from quarantine using a telnet connection to port
> 9998.
> > The recipient received the spam but my msgrcpt.rs field remains at
> NULL.
> > Isn't it supposed to change to reflect its release?
>
> No, the msgrcpt.rs
Zach,
> I'm implementing per-user scanning with SQL bayes and user prefs by
> using spamc as a primary filter, then calling amavis as a secondary
> filter. However, I'd like to amavis to still be able to quarantine
> spam. So, I see 2 possibilities:
>
> 1.) An option to inject mail to amavis that
Paolo,
> According to the output of this command and past days' rules hit I
> disabled many network tests:
> score RCVD_IN_BONDEDSENDER 0
...
Ok, although in general the ones that should really be disabled
are only the defunct ones (which time out most of the time),
or the ones which earned
M. Lewis,
> I want all of my spam to be passed (and tagged).
> I have a need to send that spam to a different address as well.
If 'a different address' is the same for all recipients,
this is a traditional case of quarantining to a mailbox,
see amavisd.conf-sample, use quarantine method 'local:'
Peter,
> I released an item from quarantine using a telnet connection to port 9998.
> The recipient received the spam but my msgrcpt.rs field remains at NULL.
> Isn't it supposed to change to reflect its release?
No, the msgrcpt.rs field is only initialized to a space by amavisd,
subsequent modif
Bartosz,
> I am running Amavis for quite some time now with SpamAssassin.
> Since today ealry morning I did not recived some mails and I have check my
> log files.I have discoverd that my non-spam e-mail are being tagged as SPAM.
> Since today I see for passed clean:
> Passed CLEAN, [xxx] -> ,
Peter,
> I am testing a spam mailbox along with 3 user entries:
> 1. email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), priority 10
> 2. domain (domain.com), priority 7
> 3. other, priority 0
> I have assigned user 2 a policy whereby mail is quarantined to a mailbox
> but sending to user 1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I sti
Peter,
> > spam_quarantine_to varchar(64) default NULL,
>
> No, it doesn't work. It gets quarantined in the db but there is nothing
> sent to the specified mailbox.
Sending quarantine to an email address only works with a
$*_quarantine_method being 'local:' (see amavisd.conf-sample).
Yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi!
I'm implementing per-user scanning with SQL bayes and user prefs by
using spamc as a primary filter, then calling amavis as a secondary
filter. However, I'd like to amavis to still be able to quarantine
spam. So, I see 2 possibilities:
1.) An option
Peter wrote:
> I am testing a spam mailbox along with 3 user entries:
> 1. email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), priority 10
> 2. domain (domain.com), priority 7
> 3. other, priority 0
> I have assigned user 2 a policy whereby mail is quarantined to a mailbox but
> sending to user 1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I s
I am testing a spam mailbox along with 3 user entries:
1. email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), priority 10
2. domain (domain.com), priority 7
3. other, priority 0
I have assigned user 2 a policy whereby mail is quarantined to a mailbox
but
sending to user 1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I still get the mail being s
Just wanted to give some other folks a heads up, I'm seeing what looks
like a fairly virulent re-outbreak of the Sober.U worm. Since
mid-afternoon yesterday, our content scanner (amavis + clamav) has
caught 30+ of these. Roadrunner seems to be the worst infected at the
moment, but I've also gott
Danita wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 16:02 +, Gary V wrote:
>> $banned_admin = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
> Thanks - am I missing some documentation somewhere? I don't see this in
> the amavisd.conf file anywhere, and don't have any docs that tell me all
> of the available switches. I hate to a
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 16:02 +, Gary V wrote:
> $banned_admin = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
Thanks - am I missing some documentation somewhere? I don't see this in
the amavisd.conf file anywhere, and don't have any docs that tell me all
of the available switches. I hate to ask a bunch of dumb quest
Danita wrote:
> I'm sorry - I have yet another "newbee" question.
> Is there a "banned admin" similar to the virus admin"? I find that
> banned files are more likely to be needed to be notified of than viruses
> so that they can be released to the recipient if necessary. But I don't
> see how t
I'm sorry - I have yet another "newbee" question.
Is there a "banned admin" similar to the virus admin"? I find that
banned files are more likely to be needed to be notified of than viruses
so that they can be released to the recipient if necessary. But I don't
see how to send a notification of
Gary V wrote:
Finally I reply to this thread...
While the system runs unloaded (no swapping) with 10 concurrent
amavisd-new process (ClamAV+SA with DNS tests), in the last days it
takes more than 15 seconds to process a message. There's been an
increase of about 70-80% in processing times in
18 matches
Mail list logo
