-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben DJ wrote:
> which approach is preferred, and/or what are the comparative (dis)advantages?
Hello,
just to add one other consideration:
My office has a policy to discard virus mails but to tag and deliver
spam mails.
The amavisd-new categories make
Patrick Wong wrote:
> 1. Training crm114 using: "spamassassin -D --revoke work for me (no update to *.css file) even after training 10 messages
> or so. Same is true for --report option. The typical output I got from
> spamassassin:
Could it be that the mail already gets a CRM114 score > 10?
Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> And I am not sure how to "train" CRM114.
> look out for a file called or containing "mailtrainer.crm"
Just one small addition:
To train single mails one can also use "crm mailreaver.crm --good" (or
--spam). When the crm114 plugin works correctly and option crm114_learn
is
Benedict White schrieb:
> Alas all I get is:
> Spam test:Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus=HASH(0xaca3110)
> as a response. What I wanted to get was a yes or no as to spaminess with a
> score as well.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_PerMsgStatus.html
> I could n
Luigi Rosa schrieb:
> I installed and configured crm114 as a SA plugin, but it appears that crm114
> don't change the score of the messages.
First of all check the crm114_command configured in crm114.cf
This is the most common error source because path names are often
different and you have to ma
Luigi Rosa schrieb:
> Download SA plugin from http://mschuette.name/wp/crm114-spamassassin-plugin/
> If your version of crm114 supports the --report_only option, then use it, and
> then you may remove the --stats_only (in crm1114.pm) to obtain a bit more
> information from crm114, not just its scor
Mark Martinec schrieb:
> bayes. I made some changes to the plugin and sent them to its author
> Martin Schütte, these are now incorporated into the v0.8.0:
Hi there.
> I just let it start from scratch, depending entirely on autolearning
> from SpamAssassin. This only works
Jules M schrieb:
> If you want to try, my actual diff against v2.6.1 looks like this:
If you do not mind I would like to publish that on the website.
I did not find the time to update my own amavisd yet; that's why I still
have no own patch for v2.6...
--
Martin
--
Peter Sørensen schrieb:
> Is it nessecary to patch amavisd-new to make this work - meaning make the
> X-CRM114-CacheID header generated by CRM114 available in the mail?
The scoring itself works without.
But to write the CacheIDs into the mail header (to make use of the
crm114 cache) the patch i