Mark Martinec schrieb: > bayes. I made some changes to the plugin and sent them to its author > Martin Schütte, these are now incorporated into the v0.8.0:
Hi there. > I just let it start from scratch, depending entirely on autolearning > from SpamAssassin. This only works well if your SpamAssassin is producing > quality results (uses good network tests, updated rules, > sought.rules.yerp.org One advice: start with a very low score, so the classifications will be visible in the headers but cannot cause false positives. When I started I did not use autolearn, but set up filter rules to receive copies of good/unsure/spam mail in seperate folders. For about two days it needed a lot of training, and after a week the filter was so reliable that I assigned a high spam-score. Currently I filter on the CRM114_UNSURE tag and sort into shared spam/ham IMAP folders. These folders are periodically trained with CRM114's mailtrainer. > crm114_dynscore 1 > crm114_dynscore_factor -0.10 Do you have the impression that dynamic scores give better results than static scores? Since I did not see an advantage on my setup and there is no documented SpamAssassin API to set them, I even thought about removing the dynscore option. -- Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
