On 11/06/2010 06:34 AM, Richard Smits wrote:
>>>
>>> But the error we are getting is : X-Amavis-Hold: Exceeded storage quota
>>> 314572800 bytes by
>>> > do_pax_cpio/pre; lastchunk 173626614 bytes
>>>
>>> Why is this ?
>>
>> How big is the stuff in the tar file? I think this is a pre-expansion
>>
On 11/04/2010 06:34 AM, Richard Smits wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have read many explanations about the "Exceeded storage quota" message
> from amavis, but cannot find an explanation why one of our emails is
> failing ?
>
> We have a user who sends a tar file which is 173 MB big. The
> amavisd.conf
On 10/18/2010 11:35 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> Seems like Amavis could be viewin those e-mails as phish/spam.
>
> What do I need to do to tell amavis that is not the case?
>
It would be SpamAssassin, if anything. If you notice that some rules are
hitting on legitimate mail, lower the scores for tho
On 09/02/2010 09:34 AM, Marco Fretz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We build a clustered mail system with postfix, amavisd, clamd, SA,
> dovecot, mysql, etc. 2 Servers are handling incoming mail (MX records
> pointing to us) and 2 are handling outgoing mail (relaying). mysql
> database is stored on 2 master-mast
On 06/29/2010 02:50 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Rich Wales:
>> I'm using Postfix 2.6.5, with AMaViSd-new 2.6.4 as an after-queue
>> content filter. Messages scoring above 5 are being quarantined for
>> later examination using MailZu.
>>
>> I would like to reconfigure my setup to use AMaViS
On 05/04/2010 10:46 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 5/4/2010 5:30 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> On Apr 25, 2010, at 5:32 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> I kind of like ignoring deprecated options with the new
>>> behavior noted in RELEASE_NOTES. That way existing
>>> installations don't break after upgrade.
>>>
>>>
Peter Huetmannsberger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure this is not slightly off topic, but I would like to hear
> your opinion on this. I looked through my logfiles today and came across a
> line that led me to check if the mailserver may have accidentally ended up
> on a RBL list.
>
> All wa
Carlos Williams wrote:
> I have never used Amavisd-new on anything but Debian or CentOS. For
> the 1st time I built a Arch Linux mail server. The sad thing is Arch
> Linux does not have Amavisd-new in their main repositories but it can
> be easily installed using AUR. My question is right now my Po
Cory Hawkless wrote:
> I did have to kill amavis 'unleanly' the other day which could explain it.
> Does this mean that these emails did not get sent?
> I would have thought there would be some type of cleanup agent that checks
> for these type of issues? Is there anything I can turn on or use to s
Tim Howe wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:58:42 -0400
> Carlos Williams wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Tim Howe wrote:
>>>One reason could be that it no longer sees the address as local.
>>> Maybe
>>> your database is no longer there or looked at, or maybe @local_domains_ma
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Michael Orlitzky
> wrote:
>> # MTA SETTINGS, UNCOMMENT AS APPROPRIATE,
>>
>> # both $forward_method and $notify_method default to
>> # 'smtp:[127.0.0.1]:10025'
>
> So you're re
Carlos Williams wrote:
> How come I don't see anything in my Amavisd-new config file about port
> 10025? I see port 10024 listed in amavisd.conf but nothing else. Does
> the above look wrong to anyone?
# MTA SETTINGS, UNCOMMENT AS APPROPRIATE,
# both $forward_method and $notify_method default t
Noel Jones wrote:
> Hrm, I thought the .ftm included with sanesecurity included most of the
> common headers not in the "official" ftm, but it looks as if they mostly
> address headers added by mailscanner.
>
> So create your own local.ftm file containing that header so clam knows
> it's a mail
Mark Martinec wrote:
> See what ended up in the .../parts directory by turning on
> per-recipient debugging, e.g.:
>
> @debug_sender_maps = ( ['yours...@example.com'] );
>
> Apart from turning on full logging for a message to the specified
> recipient address, it will also retain the contents o
Noel Jones wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> I finally caved and decided to install the SaneSecurity signatures for
>> ClamAV on my incoming mail host. However, I can't get the second
>> signature test[1] to pass. I was hoping somebody here could point me in
>&
I finally caved and decided to install the SaneSecurity signatures for
ClamAV on my incoming mail host. However, I can't get the second
signature test[1] to pass. I was hoping somebody here could point me in
the right direction.
I have already installed the SaneSecurity signatures. Mail comes i
16 matches
Mail list logo
