On Wednesday 30 June 2010 18:12:39 Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 6/30/10 11:52 AM, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new 2.6.4 with postfix 2.5.6. I would like to use my
postfix relay_domains list as amavisd's @local_domains_maps. Therefore i
have in my amavisd.conf
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new 2.6.4 with postfix 2.5.6. I would like to use my
postfix relay_domains list as amavisd's @local_domains_maps. Therefore i have
in my amavisd.conf:
@local_domains_maps = ( read_hash('/etc/postfix/relay_domains'));
And in postfix' main.cf::
relay_domains
Hello list,
I received a Spam message with these headers and all relays are recognized as
trusted, which is wrong:
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Non-encoded 8-bit data (char 85 hex): Subject: Das
ist es\205dein Traumjob!\n
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.272
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status:
Hello list,
I use postfix 2.4.3 with amavisd-new 2.5.4 and spamassassin 3.2.2.
I received a mail which amavisd couldn't finish processing. I guess it is a
spamassassin problem, but to be sure I ask here also.
Jul 15 11:56:13 server postfix/lmtp[32252]: F41C7381E71: to=[EMAIL
PROTECTED],
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 17:14, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
On Wednesday, 16. July 2008 17:02:29 Stefan Jakobs wrote:
I use postfix 2.4.3 with amavisd-new 2.5.4 and spamassassin 3.2.2.
I received a mail which amavisd couldn't finish processing. I guess it is
a spamassassin problem
Hello list,
I tried to verify the results of Mike Capella's amavis-logwatch scripts and
had to notice that the amavislogsumm.pl scripts had some faults. I fixed them
and put the new script online:
https://po2.uni-stuttgart.de/~rusjako/amavislogsumm
I recommend to use amavis-logwatch (I use it
in 29 s
PID 19494: successfully killed
The process terminated, does that mean it crashed?
I posted the debug output from this process here:
http://de.pastebin.ca/939846
Greetings Stefan
On Monday 10 March 2008 16:07, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
On Monday 10 March 2008 14:40, Mark Martinec
On Friday 07 March 2008 17:25, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Does anybody has any way to fix this, this is common now at my server:
(!!)TROUBLE in child_init_hook: BDB no dbS: Lock table is out of available
locker entries, . at (eval 38) line 30.
FYI:
After an upgrade of BerkeleyDB (perl
On Monday 10 March 2008 14:40, Mark Martinec wrote:
Stefan,
On Friday 07 March 2008 17:25, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Does anybody has any way to fix this, this is common now at my server:
(!!)TROUBLE in child_init_hook: BDB no dbS: Lock table is out of
available locker entries,
Hello list,
I like to increase the number of amavisd processes, therefore I set
$max_servers from 20 to 40. And in the postfix master.cf I changed the number
of processes for amavisd also:
smtp-amavis unix - - n - 40 lmtp
But if I restart postfix and amavisd,
Hello list,
I'm using postfix version 2.4.5 with amavisd-new version 2.5.2. Yesterday I
found this lines in my logfile. Can somebody tell me what is this about?
Jan 10 17:52:32 server amavis[5767]: (05767-03) smtp resp to MAIL
(pip):
Jan 10 17:53:32 server amavis[5767]: (05767-03) Negative
On Monday 15 October 2007 09:55, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
I didn't know amavislogsumm, but I can see in the changelog that the
last version is dated on feb-2004. It seems an old and out-of-date project.
¿Do you know amavis-logwatch [1]? It's devepelod by Mike Capella, an
active member of
Hello list,
does any of you know who maintains amavislogsumm? The version I use (0.73)
doesn't work propper with amavisd-new 2.5.x. I fixed it for me, but it seams
that there is no actuall version in the internet and the link on the amavis
Homepage
Hello list,
The Problem was that I disabled ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio. I changed it to
ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio = 250. And the mailbomb will be detected.
Bye Stefan
Stefan Jakobs:
Hello list,
I'm running a server with postfix 2.4.3, amavis 2.5.2 and clamav 0.91.1.
Yesterday I send
Hello list,
I'm running a server with postfix 2.4.3, amavis 2.5.2 and clamav 0.91.1.
Yesterday I send the testmessage sample-42-mail-bomb.txt from the amavisd-new
package through my mailsystem and got the following:
Aug 6 14:24:19 server amavis[22492]: (22492-03)
LMTP::10024
Hello list,
I'm running a mailrelay with postfix 2.2.3 and amavisd-new 2.3.3. If my server
gets under high load, I will get high values in fwd-data-end. Here is an
example:
amavis[3399]: (03399-01-17) TIMING [total 17891 ms] -
SMTP pre-DATA-flush: 5 (0%)0, SMTP DATA: 41 (0%)0, body_digest: 1
Am Donnerstag, 29. Juni 2006 11:35 schrieb Mark Martinec:
How can I tell spamc to use the SA daemon started by amavis?
You can't. spamc expects to talk its own spamc/spamd protocol
to a daemon, but amavisd only speaks a standard SMTP protocol.
Oh, it seems that I must use spamd.
Mark and
Hello,
The 'viruses_that_fake_sender_maps' configuration option allows you to
define which viruses are known to fake the sender address - and hence not
to sent notifications back to a faked address (where some innocent person
is otherwise sat receiving all of these notifications for viruses
Hello list,
I use amavisd-new 2.3.3 with postfix on a linux server.
I want to configure amavisd that it sends a Virus notification to the sender
and the recipient.
If the detected virus isn't in viruses_that_fake_sender_maps then it'll work
fine with my configuration. Both get an email. But if
19 matches
Mail list logo
