Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-11-22 Thread Benny Pedersen
On søn 25 okt 2009 07:17:07 CET, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote > Let's end this thread. I think everybody has made their point. only thing i miss is delete filebased files in quarantine that are deleted/released in mailzu, if that is done in sql based quarantine storage if amavisd-new can do this

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-11-22 Thread Benny Pedersen
On fre 23 okt 2009 11:32:55 CEST, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote > Should I get myself a pair of new glasses or is such functionality not > implemented? mailzu 0.1 have this, but now homepage seems gone, it just dont stop that i have mailzu(ng) working as you like it to do with amavisd-new -- xpoin

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-24 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Mikael Bak : > Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > >> I think you misunderstand me. > >> I say the user actively tell amavisd-new to mark the quarantined email > >> for deletion. Then the cronscript deletes only those marked for deletion > >> and probably those that has been released. > > > > You are r

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-24 Thread Mikael Bak
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: >> I think you misunderstand me. >> I say the user actively tell amavisd-new to mark the quarantined email >> for deletion. Then the cronscript deletes only those marked for deletion >> and probably those that has been released. > > You are right. I misunderstood you. >

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-24 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Mikael Bak : > Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > * Michael Scheidell : > >> > >> Mikael Bak wrote: > >>> IMHO not at all like that. > >>> Amavisd-new should only do something like this: > >>> UPDATE msgrcpt SET rs='D' WHERE mail_id=X > >>> > >>> Housekeeping is done by cronscripts. > >>> > >>> >

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-24 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Michael Scheidell : > Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > We run SA and anti-virus in pre-queue mode. > > > > We use Postfix' smtpd_proxy_filter and Postfix' Sendmail milter API. > > smtpd_proxy_filter is more stable. Sometimes the milter on Postfix bails > > out. > > I haven't had time to investigat

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-24 Thread Michael Scheidell
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > We run SA and anti-virus in pre-queue mode. > > We use Postfix' smtpd_proxy_filter and Postfix' Sendmail milter API. > smtpd_proxy_filter is more stable. Sometimes the milter on Postfix bails out. > I haven't had time to investigate that any closer yet. > > In either ca

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-24 Thread Mikael Bak
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Michael Scheidell : >> >> Mikael Bak wrote: >>> IMHO not at all like that. >>> Amavisd-new should only do something like this: >>> UPDATE msgrcpt SET rs='D' WHERE mail_id=X >>> >>> Housekeeping is done by cronscripts. >>> >>> >> I guess my point is, that releasing

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Michael Scheidell : > Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > > > Nope. It's pretty straightforward: Either you reject it or you accept it > > during SMTP session. No bounce. No NDR. > > > > > you run SA in pre-queue mode? or just accept most spam (quarantine it)? > If you reject it (at smtp session),

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > Nope. It's pretty straightforward: Either you reject it or you accept it > during SMTP session. No bounce. No NDR. > > you run SA in pre-queue mode? or just accept most spam (quarantine it)? If you reject it (at smtp session), doen't you send it a 5xx during sessi

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Michael Scheidell : > Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > > * Michael Scheidell : > > > > I'm sorry, but automatic removal e.g. by a cron called script is not an > > option in my case. I need to stick with Germans laws. In a nutshell they > > say: > > > > If the server accepts a message it has to

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote: > * Michael Scheidell : > >> > > I'm sorry, but automatic removal e.g. by a cron called script is not an > option in my case. I need to stick with Germans laws. In a nutshell they say: > > If the server accepts a message it has to be delivered to the user. You may

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Michael Scheidell : > > > Mikael Bak wrote: > > IMHO not at all like that. > > Amavisd-new should only do something like this: > > UPDATE msgrcpt SET rs='D' WHERE mail_id=X > > > > Housekeeping is done by cronscripts. > > > > > I guess my point is, that releasing a quarantined email took a c

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Mikael Bak
Michael Scheidell wrote: > Mark Martinec wrote: >> Patrick, >> >> >>> I see, I can request to requeue/release a message using AM.PDP, but I don't >>> see how I can request a quarantined message can be deleted. >>> >>> Should I get myself a pair of new glasses or is such functionality not >>> imp

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
Mikael Bak wrote: > IMHO not at all like that. > Amavisd-new should only do something like this: > UPDATE msgrcpt SET rs='D' WHERE mail_id=X > > Housekeeping is done by cronscripts. > > I guess my point is, that releasing a quarantined email took a couple steps, needed to combine the chunks a

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
Mark Martinec wrote: > Patrick, > > >> I see, I can request to requeue/release a message using AM.PDP, but I don't >> see how I can request a quarantined message can be deleted. >> >> Should I get myself a pair of new glasses or is such functionality not >> implemented? >> > > No need for n

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
* Mark Martinec : > > I see, I can request to requeue/release a message using AM.PDP, but I don't > > see how I can request a quarantined message can be deleted. > > > > Should I get myself a pair of new glasses or is such functionality not > > implemented? > > No need for new glasses, it is inde

Re: [AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Mark Martinec
Patrick, > I see, I can request to requeue/release a message using AM.PDP, but I don't > see how I can request a quarantined message can be deleted. > > Should I get myself a pair of new glasses or is such functionality not > implemented? No need for new glasses, it is indeed not implemented. I

[AMaViS-user] AM.PDP: request=delete?

2009-10-23 Thread Patrick Ben Koetter
I see, I can request to requeue/release a message using AM.PDP, but I don't see how I can request a quarantined message can be deleted. Should I get myself a pair of new glasses or is such functionality not implemented? p...@rick -- All technical questions asked privately will be automatically