On Apr 9, 2008, at 10:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, I'm not sure what has happened, but my own email address along
> with
> many of my users is being used as a forged sender address for a lot of
FYI, this is old news. You've just got lucky until now. Get onto
the ~warez lists and ge
Eray,
> The above and non-milter DKIM sign/verify are great features.
> Do you have a timetable for the 2.6.0 release?
Hopefully within a week.
Mark
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don
On 15.04.2008 15:22, Mark Martinec wrote:
>> For inbound NDRs, the original recipient of the NDR could be checked for
>> a corresponding outbound message from the original sender. Without a
>> match, the SA score could be bumped a few points. It seems that the
>> major challenge would be in ident
Scott,
> Could the amavisd penpals feature be of some help here?
Yes.
> For inbound NDRs, the original recipient of the NDR could be checked for
> a corresponding outbound message from the original sender. Without a
> match, the SA score could be bumped a few points. It seems that the
> major
> A great document on helping with this problem is:
>
> http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
This certainly can help, but my tests have shown that SA catches pretty
much all of this type of backscatter, anyway. In fact, most of the
messages caught by this method would end up with an SA
Ditto -- any help here ???
cheers
c
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 14:21 -0600, Craig Baird wrote:
> Quoting Rob MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Have you looked into SPF, which should help make your domain less
> > attractive to spammers forging addresses.
>
> There is something going on. We're s
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, I'm not sure what has happened, but my own email address along with
> many of my users is being used as a forged sender address for a lot of
> spam, and I'm getting pummeled by backscatter (as in I just came back from
> lunch after having cleared
Craig,
> There is something going on. We're seeing a ton of backscatter as
> well. It seems that spammers are resorting to mass joe jobs, and
> have been doing so for a couple of weeks. There were a couple of
> posts over on the SA list recently saying that some people are seeing
> this same th
Quoting Rob MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Have you looked into SPF, which should help make your domain less
> attractive to spammers forging addresses.
There is something going on. We're seeing a ton of backscatter as
well. It seems that spammers are resorting to mass joe jobs, and
have been
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I'm not sure what has happened, but my own email address along with
> many of my users is being used as a forged sender address for a lot of
> spam, and I'm getting pummeled by backscatter (as in I just came back from
> lunch afte
Ok, I'm not sure what has happened, but my own email address along with
many of my users is being used as a forged sender address for a lot of
spam, and I'm getting pummeled by backscatter (as in I just came back from
lunch after having cleared them out and had 27 more delivery failure
messages
On 2/28/08, Gary V wrote:
> On 2/28/08, John Thomas wrote:
> > I recently saw the following recommended configuration show up on the list:
> > final_spam_destiny => D_BOUNCE, # so the sender knows they are a spammer
> > Does this cause backscatter if Amavis is not set up as a milter and if
> > so
On 2/28/08, John Thomas wrote:
> I recently saw the following recommended configuration show up on the list:
> final_spam_destiny => D_BOUNCE, # so the sender knows they are a spammer
> Does this cause backscatter if Amavis is not set up as a milter and if
> so shouldn't that be discouraged as it
I recently saw the following recommended configuration show up on the list:
final_spam_destiny => D_BOUNCE, # so the sender knows they are a spammer
Does this cause backscatter if Amavis is not set up as a milter and if
so shouldn't that be discouraged as it causes spam?
Link regarding backscatter
I'd like to point out that you are causing tens if not hundreds of
thousands of people to get more spam in their mailbox using this design.
Why?
1. You accept a piece of spam with a forged sender.
2. You attempt to contact the far side for delivery.
3. The far side recognizes spam and rejects it
15 matches
Mail list logo
