* alex handle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
before-queue-filter?
I tried it once, but it was too slow and couldn't keep up with the
amount of mail we are getting.
On top days we process 250 000 mails per day, running amavisd-new
with
alex handle schrieb:
Hi!
Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
before-queue-filter?
I want to reject spam at the smtp level, because it is far more transparent
for the sender.
On top days we process 250 000 mails per day, running amavisd-new
with spamassassin, clamav
On 3/29/07, Christian Rost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alex handle schrieb:
Hi!
Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
before-queue-filter?
I want to reject spam at the smtp level, because it is far more
transparent
for the sender.
On top days we process 250 000
From: alex handle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
before-queue-filter?
Yes.
On top days we process 250 000 mails per day, running amavisd-new
with spamassassin, clamav and amavis unpackers disabled on a two-node
cluster.
No way. A message takes
Alex,
Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
before-queue-filter?
I want to reject spam at the smtp level, because it is
far more transparent for the sender.
On top days we process 250 000 mails per day, running amavisd-new
with spamassassin, clamav and amavis unpackers
* alex handle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/29/07, Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* alex handle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
before-queue-filter?
I tried it once, but it was too slow and couldn't keep up with the
amount
On 3/29/07, Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* alex handle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 3/29/07, Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* alex handle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
Does someone have experience with running amavisd-new as
before-queue-filter?
I tried it
