Robert Brooks wrote:
> Mark Martinec wrote:
> I mean something like this...
> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02% 50.37%
>> Seems like you want a frequency distribution: divide a score range
>> into ar
MrC wrote:
> Robert Brooks wrote:
[..]
>> Oct 5 09:01:06 mailhost amavis[25870]: (25870-17) Blocked SPAM,
>> [84.79.70.165] [84.79.70.165] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ->
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mail_id: HFW3sN8D+u30, Hits: 20.862, size: 719,
>> 11887 ms
[..]
> Without data in the log that supports
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Robert Brooks wrote:
>
> [..] (discussing postfix-logwatch log analyser)
>
>>> whilst I'm being a pain the Postfix reject figures don't show
>>> rejections from before-queue amavis. Unfortunately Postfix doesn't
>>> seem to log this well :(
>>
>> I don't use
MrC wrote:
> Robert Brooks wrote:
[..] (discussing postfix-logwatch log analyser)
>> whilst I'm being a pain the Postfix reject figures don't show
>> rejections from before-queue amavis. Unfortunately Postfix doesn't
>> seem to log this well :(
>
> I don't use a before-queue setup, and don't k
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>>> Mark Martinec wrote:
>>> I mean something like this...
>>> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
>>> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02% 50.37%
Seems like you want a frequency distribution: divide a
MrC wrote:
>> Mark Martinec wrote:
>> I mean something like this...
>> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
>> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02% 50.37%
>>> Seems like you want a frequency distribution: divide a score range
>>> into arbitr
> Mark Martinec wrote:
> I mean something like this...
> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02% 50.37%
>> Seems like you want a frequency distribution: divide a score range
>> into arbitrary buckets, fill
Mark Martinec wrote:
I mean something like this...
Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02% 50.37%
>
> Seems like you want a frequency distribution: divide a score range
> into arbitrary buckets, fill the
> >> I mean something like this...
> >> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
> >> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02% 50.37%
Seems like you want a frequency distribution: divide a score range
into arbitrary buckets, fill them by counts of messages fal
>> I mean something like this...
>>
>>
>> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
>>
>> Percentile5.89% 12.59% 19.43% 24.81% 35.02%
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Robert Brooks wrote:
>>> MrC wrote:
> I mean something like this...
>
>
> Spam Score -5 0 3 5 10 15
> -
MrC wrote:
> Robert Brooks wrote:
>> MrC wrote:
>>> I see. Its easy enough to implement. I had originally not seen much
>>> value in those numbers, but will be happy to add the feature if it is
>>> useful.
>>
>> seeing the overall performance of amavis is useful to me, especially
>> as I use a
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> I see. Its easy enough to implement. I had originally not seen much
>> value in those numbers, but will be happy to add the feature if it is
>> useful.
>
> seeing the overall performance of amavis is useful to me, especially as
> I use amavis before-queue.
MrC wrote:
> I see. Its easy enough to implement. I had originally not seen much
> value in those numbers, but will be happy to add the feature if it is
> useful.
seeing the overall performance of amavis is useful to me, especially as
I use amavis before-queue.
also, spam score percentiles.
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Is your request different from the timings percentiles report that
>> currently exists ? Example at the end of:
>>
>>http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/example-amavis-detail10
>>
>> It is obtained with detail level >= 5.
>
> this is what I
MrC wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Is your request different from the timings percentiles report that
> currently exists ? Example at the end of:
>
>http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/example-amavis-detail10
>
> It is obtained with detail level >= 5.
this is what I'm thinking about, but as well a
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Benedict - feel free to drop me a line if you have questions or
>> improvement requests. I have just made some recent experimental
>> changes in the summary presentation, and am looking for feedback on
>> that in particular.
>
> one thing I'd like to see is
MrC wrote:
> Benedict - feel free to drop me a line if you have questions or
> improvement requests. I have just made some recent experimental changes
> in the summary presentation, and am looking for feedback on that in
> particular.
one thing I'd like to see is the percentiles for total time
Curtis Doty wrote:
> Here's a couple of tweaks needed to quiet down the unmatched noise a bit:
>
> --- amavis-logwatch.orig2007-09-17 21:07:47.0 -0700
> +++ amavis-logwatch2007-09-21 09:43:46.0 -0700
> @@ -458,6 +458,10 @@
> or ($p1 =~ /^updating snmp variables/)
> + or ($p1 =~ /^AM.PDP /) # this appears to be always two spaces
^^^
> or ($p1 =~ /email.txt no longer exists, can't re-use it/)
^^^
Don't forget to quote literal dots: \. is a dot, a . matches any character.
Mark
---
Yesterday MrC said:
> Mark Martinec wrote:
> >
> > Seems the only one that is actively maintained is the logwatch:
> > http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/
> >
>
> Benedict - feel free to drop me a line if you have questions or
> improvement requests. I have just made some recent experimental
Benedict White wrote:
> has anyone got a recomendation for a log file analyser for both Amavis and
> Postfix.
>
> I have got some reasonable ones for each but could do with one that works
> with both.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Benedict White
Mark Martinec wrote:
> Benedict,
>
>> has anyone got
Benedict,
> has anyone got a recomendation for a log file analyser for both Amavis and
> Postfix. I have got some reasonable ones for each but could do with one
> that works with both.
Seems the only one that is actively maintained is the logwatch:
http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/
Mark
-
Benedict White wrote:
> has anyone got a recomendation for a log file analyser for both Amavis and
> Postfix.
>
> I have got some reasonable ones for each but could do with one that works
> with both.
>
>
mailgraph
> Kind regards
>
> Benedict White
>
>
> ---
has anyone got a recomendation for a log file analyser for both Amavis and
Postfix.
I have got some reasonable ones for each but could do with one that works with
both.
Kind regards
Benedict White
-
This SF.net email is
Troy Davis wrote:
> Amavis-new and spamassin have been installed for me but I am trying to work
> on getting it working better / properly
>
> First I do not seem to be getting a log file in /var/log as the amavisd.conf
> file directs, So help on getting a log file would be first.
>
>
>
> # Sec
> # true (e.g. 1) => syslog; false (e.g. 0) => logging to file
>
> $DO_SYSLOG = 1; # (defaults to false)
>
> #$SYSLOG_LEVEL = 'user.info'; # (facility.priority, default
> 'mail.info')
>
>
>
> # Log file (if not using syslog)
>
> $LOGFILE = "/var/log/amavis.log"; # (defaults to
Amavis-new and spamassin have been installed for me but I am trying to work
on getting it working better / properly
First I do not seem to be getting a log file in /var/log as the amavisd.conf
file directs, So help on getting a log file would be first.
# Section III - Logging
#
# true (e.
28 matches
Mail list logo
