Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-27 Thread Mark Martinec
Leonardo Rodrigues, > As not defined on amavisd.conf, amavisd use it's own internal > default definition that gives 0.1 for SaneSecurity detected messages. As > 0.1 probably wont change the 'spam-or-not' situation of almost all > messages, so i think 0.1 is PRETTY low and VERY much conversative va

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-19 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu: > > even more interesting is that the definition is there on > amavisd.conf-sample, but not on amavisd.conf-default :) > > mystiped . the definition is there on amavisd.conf-default but NOT on amavisd.conf.sample. I changed sample by defaul

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-19 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu: > Benny Pedersen escreveu: > >> On Mon, June 16, 2008 13:02, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: >> >> >>> anyway, it would be interesting if this 0.1 value is raised to >>> something more helpful . >>> >>> >> how ? >> > > My

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-19 Thread Bernd Probst
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Benny Pedersen > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2008 15:11 > An: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messa

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-19 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Benny Pedersen escreveu: > On Mon, June 16, 2008 13:02, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: > > >> anyway, it would be interesting if this 0.1 value is raised to >> something more helpful . >> > > how ? > My idea is that amavisd.conf-sample, shipped with 2.6.0, that does NOT

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-19 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, June 16, 2008 13:02, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: > anyway, it would be interesting if this 0.1 value is raised to > something more helpful . how ? Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-19 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Mon, June 16, 2008 12:54, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: > tests=[AV:Email.Malware.Sanesecurity.0802=0.1, > DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.394, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.672, > SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJECT_NEEDS_ENCODING=2] tell SPF domain that thay sends malware t

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-16 Thread Mark Martinec
Leonardo Rodrigues, > Forget it found it on RELEASE_NOTED from amavisd-2.6.0. It's > all about @virus_name_to_spam_score_maps > anyway, it would be interesting if this 0.1 value is raised to > something more helpful . If you read a few lines further down in the same release notes, you'd

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-16 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu: > > Forget it found it on RELEASE_NOTED from amavisd-2.6.0. It's > all about @virus_name_to_spam_score_maps > > anyway, it would be interesting if this 0.1 value is raised to > something more helpful . > maybe this variable could b

Re: [AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-16 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu: > Hello, > > I'm apparently having some AV-detected messages being delivered to > final users. Some lines from amavisd log: > > > Jun 16 06:52:37 correio amavis[2641]: (02641-18) run_av (ClamAV-clamd): > /var/amavis/amavis-20080615T230236-02641/par

[AMaViS-user] question on AV-detected messages

2008-06-16 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Hello, I'm apparently having some AV-detected messages being delivered to final users. Some lines from amavisd log: Jun 16 06:52:37 correio amavis[2641]: (02641-18) run_av (ClamAV-clamd): /var/amavis/amavis-20080615T230236-02641/parts INFECTED: Email.Malware.Sanesecurity.0802 J