Re: AW: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-19 Thread Christian Rößner
https://github.com/sys4/rspamd-quarantine -- Rößner-Network-Solutions Karl-Bröger-Str. 10, 36304 Alsfeld T: +49 6631 9110725, F: +49 6631 78823409, M: +49 171 9905345 USt-IdNr.: DE225643613, https://roessner-network-solutions.com > Am 18.10.2018 um 16:08 schrieb Ralf Kirmis : > > > On Wed, 10

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-18 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 18.10.2018 um 15:36 schrieb Christian Rößner: > > >> Am 09.10.2018 um 18:58 schrieb pgndev : >> >> The discussed 'facts' here include: >> >> amavisd is not actively maintained >> it's a 1-persoon project, & the author's non-responsive to comms >> it's perl >> spam admin's a

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-18 Thread Benny Pedersen
Christian Rößner skrev den 2018-10-18 15:36: Alternatives do exist, but need to be cobbled together. Maybe people should have a look at Rspamd ;-) its well tested on raspberry pi running netbsd Just my opinion. you are not alone ? (Proxy-maintainer for the Gentoo build of Rspamd) if

AW: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-18 Thread Ralf Kirmis
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:45:29 +0530 Christian Rößner > wrote: > Maybe people should have a look at Rspamd ;-) > Just my opinion. > Christian > (Proxy-maintainer for the Gentoo build of Rspamd) -- Yes would do that: if Rspamd would support mysql or another database for the user prefs and

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-18 Thread Christian Rößner
> Am 09.10.2018 um 18:58 schrieb pgndev : > > The discussed 'facts' here include: > > amavisd is not actively maintained > it's a 1-persoon project, & the author's non-responsive to comms > it's perl > spam admin's a constantly moving target > > Alternatives do exist, but need

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-09 Thread Indunil Jayasooriya
> > > >> > >>>I hope Amavis could still be maintained. DSPAM is already gone. If > >>>also Amavis dies, Spamassassin will follow... > > on October 9, 2018, amavisd-new-2.11.1 was released https://amavis.org/release-notes.txt > > -- cat /etc/motd Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Marco skrev den 2018-10-08 13:48: I hope Amavis could still be maintained. DSPAM is already gone. If also Amavis dies, Spamassassin will follow... Benny Pedersen писал 2018-10-08 15:55: and spampd, mimedefang, canit, canit-pro, procmail, fuglu will possible die aswell then ? :=) note

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-09 Thread pgndev
The discussed 'facts' here include: amavisd is not actively maintained it's a 1-persoon project, & the author's non-responsive to comms it's perl spam admin's a constantly moving target Alternatives do exist, but need to be cobbled together. In postfix-land, here, a combo of

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-09 Thread Boris Gulay
Benny Pedersen писал 2018-10-08 15:55: Marco skrev den 2018-10-08 13:48: I hope Amavis could still be maintained. DSPAM is already gone. If also Amavis dies, Spamassassin will follow... and spampd, mimedefang, canit, canit-pro, procmail, fuglu will possible die aswell then ? :=) note

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-09 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 08.10.2018 um 14:14 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: >> I hope Amavis could still be maintained. DSPAM is already gone. If also >> Amavis dies, Spamassassin will follow... > > Especially since Mark is/was active in both amavisd and SpamAssassin! > spamassassin has just released new version 3.4.2

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread @lbutlr
On 07 Oct 2018, at 15:35, Dave McGuire wrote: > Still works fine here. Personally I rather like it when a piece of > infrastructure software stops being a "moving target". When ut us supposed to be dealing with the constantly movie target of malicious emails, no, I don’t like to see it stop

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Benny Pedersen
Marco skrev den 2018-10-08 13:48: I hope Amavis could still be maintained. DSPAM is already gone. If also Amavis dies, Spamassassin will follow... and spampd, mimedefang, canit, canit-pro, procmail, fuglu will possible die aswell then ? :=) note rspamd can be used in amavisd aswell as

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Henrik K
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 02:14:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > I hope Amavis could still be maintained. DSPAM is already gone. If also > > Amavis dies, Spamassassin will follow... > > Especially since Mark is/was active in both amavisd and SpamAssassin! You can't compare one-man shop to

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
> I hope Amavis could still be maintained. DSPAM is already gone. If also > Amavis dies, Spamassassin will follow... Especially since Mark is/was active in both amavisd and SpamAssassin! -- [*] sys4 AG https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG, 80333 München

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 08.10.18 09:21, Tom Sommer wrote: > [OpenDKIM] is a perfectly fine solution, since it's not really an > Amavis-job to handle DKIM. And who gave you the mandate to decide what is and what is not "an Amavis-job"? ;-) See https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#features -- amavisd-new is designed

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Marco
Hello, I use Amavis as interface to Spamassassin and DSPAM, using the Spamassassin DSPAM plugin. This setup is very useful to have a global spam protection and a fast per-user learn "on error" (DSPAM), configured through LDAP. With the LDAP ExtLookupDriver I can map all mailboxes aliases on

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
> Looks like it was long ago. rspamd can now also be installed as a filter > and it works "out of the box". Yes, it has improved a lot during the last year (or at least since I last tried installing it). > And one more impotent advantage of rspamd: it gives you access to global > SPAM

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Tom Sommer
On 2018-10-08 09:37, Boris Gulay wrote: Benny Pedersen писал 2018-10-08 00:18: Boris Gulay skrev den 2018-10-07 21:24: Benny Pedersen писал 2018-10-07 17:34: Ralph Seichter skrev den 2018-10-07 14:48: On 07.10.18 12:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote: That's too a one man show? See

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Boris Gulay
Benny Pedersen писал 2018-10-08 00:18: Boris Gulay skrev den 2018-10-07 21:24: Benny Pedersen писал 2018-10-07 17:34: Ralph Seichter skrev den 2018-10-07 14:48: On 07.10.18 12:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote: That's too a one man show? See https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/blob/master/AUTHORS.md

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-08 Thread Tom Sommer
On 2018-10-08 01:39, Ralph Seichter wrote: On 08.10.18 01:09, Dave McGuire wrote: are there any bugs in amavisd-new that anyone cares about at this point? Yes, DKIM-related, see my original message. From what I can tell the available patch does not fix everything. Because of this issue I

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread David Newman
On 10/7/18 4:09 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: > On 10/07/2018 07:05 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: >>> Personally I rather like it when a piece of infrastructure software >>> stops being a "moving target". >> >> I like to know if software currently used in production systems is >> maintained, i.e. how

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 08.10.18 01:09, Dave McGuire wrote: > are there any bugs in amavisd-new that anyone cares about at this > point? Yes, DKIM-related, see my original message. From what I can tell the available patch does not fix everything. Because of this issue I have disabled amavisd-new's DKIM-features

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Dave McGuire
On 10/07/2018 07:05 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: >> Personally I rather like it when a piece of infrastructure software >> stops being a "moving target". > > I like to know if software currently used in production systems is > maintained, i.e. how likely it is that bugs will be fixed in a >

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 07.10.18 23:35, Dave McGuire wrote: > Personally I rather like it when a piece of infrastructure software > stops being a "moving target". I like to know if software currently used in production systems is maintained, i.e. how likely it is that bugs will be fixed in a reasonable amount of

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Dave McGuire
On 10/07/2018 04:15 PM, Boris Gulay wrote: >> Would that not only give a false sense of amavisd-new being maintained >> after all? I still hope Mark Martinec will answer (I mailed him today) > I've sent him a letter with some fixed more then two month ago. Still no > reply. > Just check when last

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
Boris Gulay skrev den 2018-10-07 21:24: Benny Pedersen писал 2018-10-07 17:34: Ralph Seichter skrev den 2018-10-07 14:48: On 07.10.18 12:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote: That's too a one man show? See https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/blob/master/AUTHORS.md impresive that amavisd have less

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Boris Gulay
Ralph Seichter писал 2018-10-07 15:44: On 07.10.18 12:23, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: Would that not only give a false sense of amavisd-new being maintained after all? I still hope Mark Martinec will answer (I mailed him today) I've sent him a letter with some fixed more then two month ago.

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Boris Gulay
Benny Pedersen писал 2018-10-07 17:34: Ralph Seichter skrev den 2018-10-07 14:48: On 07.10.18 12:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote: That's too a one man show? See https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/blob/master/AUTHORS.md impresive that amavisd have less tickets Because rspamd is actively

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Benny Pedersen
Ralph Seichter skrev den 2018-10-07 14:48: On 07.10.18 12:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote: That's too a one man show? See https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/blob/master/AUTHORS.md impresive that amavisd have less tickets

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 07.10.18 12:12, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > That's too a one man show? See https://github.com/rspamd/rspamd/blob/master/AUTHORS.md -Ralph

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 07.10.18 12:23, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Not really merge them or even do a new release (which is a fork > needing manpower and coordination to avoid fragmentation), but as a > central point for known defects and patches floating around on the > mailing list. Would that not only give a false

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
Hi, I think a good start would be to import the past amavisd-new releases into Github / Gitlab and start collecting issues and pull requests for bugfixes. Not really merge them or even do a new release (which is a fork needing manpower and coordination to avoid fragmentation), but as a central

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 07.10.2018 um 11:27 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: We recently migrated away from amavisd-new and are now using rspamd. That's too a one man show? Alexander

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
We recently migrated away from amavisd-new and are now using rspamd.

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Giovanni Bechis
Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 07.10.18 00:26, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > >> I think that if Mark Martinek is not maintaining any more the >> community should step up and fork the project. > > Are you volunteering? I've made some local modifications over time, but > amavisd-new with its >35000 lines

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-07 Thread Indunil Jayasooriya
Zimbra also comes with it. What will be zimbra's future? What about spamtitan? On Oct 7, 2018 4:46 AM, "Ralph Seichter" wrote: > On 07.10.18 00:26, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > > > I think that if Mark Martinek is not maintaining any more the > > community should step up and fork the project. > >

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-06 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 07.10.18 00:26, Giovanni Bechis wrote: > I think that if Mark Martinek is not maintaining any more the > community should step up and fork the project. Are you volunteering? I've made some local modifications over time, but amavisd-new with its >35000 lines of monolithic Perl is not something

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-06 Thread Giovanni Bechis
@lbutlr wrote: > On 04 Oct 2018, at 12:22, Ralph Seichter wrote: >> Does anybody here know if Mark Martinec (or anybody else) is actively >> maintaining amavisd-new? https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ has last >> been updated more than two years ago, with the 2.11.0 release. The link >> to the

Re: Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-05 Thread @lbutlr
On 04 Oct 2018, at 12:22, Ralph Seichter wrote: > Does anybody here know if Mark Martinec (or anybody else) is actively > maintaining amavisd-new? https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ has last > been updated more than two years ago, with the 2.11.0 release. The link > to the "Freshmeat project

Is amavisd-new still being maintained?

2018-10-04 Thread Ralph Seichter
Hello list members. Does anybody here know if Mark Martinec (or anybody else) is actively maintaining amavisd-new? https://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ has last been updated more than two years ago, with the 2.11.0 release. The link to the "Freshmeat project page" [1] points to information which