Re: [Amforth] AMFORTH 5.8 on Uno R3

2015-05-11 Thread Enoch
Erich Wälde writes: > Enoch, > > > Enoch writes: > >> writes: >> >>> Enoch, >>> >>> >>> I repeat, I am not going to get into a licensing debate with anyone, but I >>> believe I have satisfied the GPLv3 requirements. &g

Re: [Amforth] AMFORTH 5.8 on Uno R3

2015-05-09 Thread Enoch
writes: > Enoch, > > > I repeat, I am not going to get into a licensing debate with anyone, but I > believe I have satisfied the GPLv3 requirements. > > > DaR > I don't question your compliance Dennis, I leave that task to the copyright holder :-) Unfortunate

Re: [Amforth] AMFORTH 5.8 on Uno R3

2015-05-09 Thread Enoch
Dennis, I would like to caution you that AmForth nowadays is GPLv3, i.e., "most toxic" :-) I forked AmForth and continued with my independent AmForth-Shadow development when Matthias made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. My new stuff is FreeBSD like licensed. Cheers, Enoch. https://

Re: [Amforth] AMFORTH 5.8 on Uno R3

2015-04-20 Thread Enoch
still frustrating for you then I will stop writing to this mailing list. > > --Steve Hmm... I think that new users of standrd platforms, such as Arduino Uno R3, are entitled to expect the availability of AmForth binaries to get them started immediately. Can't someone here with a worki

[Amforth] New clock library

2015-02-25 Thread Enoch
Interrupt Service Routines (ISRs) by introducing delayed execution words. An ISR, for example, before it ends can schedule continued activity after a desired number of milliseconds. See elist ( delay value xt -- error-flag ), etc. I trust to have your interest. Thanks, Enoch. P/S AmForth-Shadow is an

[Amforth] AmForth-Shadow new "clock library"

2015-02-25 Thread Enoch
le continued activity after a desired number of milliseconds. I trust to have your interest. Thanks, Enoch. -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and develope

Re: [Amforth] [AMFORTH] USB Serial Support for AMFORTH 4.6 on Arduino Micro

2014-12-23 Thread Enoch
Hi Jeff, Did you model your AmForth USB support (host mode I presume) on some known API? Do you have a public repository for this project? Thanks, Enoch. Jeff Rosenwald writes: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Rosenwald > To: jeffrose

Re: [Amforth] Release 5.6 is out

2014-12-22 Thread Enoch
need to serve in a "mission critical" system using common real-time programming methods (e.g., Second Level Interrupt Handlers). Let me wish Matthias a happy AVR8/MSP430 marriage, a path The Shadow will not follow. Regards, Enoch. On 12/22/2014 12:59 PM, Matthias Trute wrote: > Hi

Re: [Amforth] Amforth News

2014-11-18 Thread Enoch
Marrying a von Neumann architecture (MSP430) with a Harvard architecture (AVR8)... Hope the offspring would come out normal :-) Good luck, Enoch. -- Matthias Trute writes: > Hi John and Brad, > >> This cross

Re: [Amforth] New License

2014-11-12 Thread Enoch
be no merging of code or documentation from AmForth further to svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/amforth/code/trunk@1687 which announced its change of license. Let me end this message with the hope that the advantages of competition in the AmForth* arena will outweigh its downside. Thanks, Enoch. P/S So

Re: [Amforth] New License

2014-11-01 Thread Enoch
Andreas Wagner writes: > I, for one, welcome this change. It will make it possible to use code from > gforth in amforth projects. > > Enoch, if you can't live with the license change, you might consider > asforth ( https://github.com/nfz/asforth ) a subroutine threaded fork

Re: [Amforth] New License

2014-11-01 Thread Enoch
ss of your project and thus, I consider this to be basic courtesy. > > Sorry, you're right. So the formal request: I intent to change the > license from GPLv2 to GPLv3. Details are available at www.fsf.org > The reason is that I intent to include a major GPLv3 licensed > code bas

Re: [Amforth] Amforth last week changes

2014-10-30 Thread Enoch
mForth from trunk@1687 onward will never be used in any commercial product, nor would it ever be the choice of any law abiding professional developer (aka consultant). If this is what you want to accomplish -- good luck, if not -- reconsider your move. AmForth-Shadow <https://github.com/wexi/a

[Amforth] Amforth last week changes

2014-10-28 Thread Enoch
don't undertstand why you are not providing this feature through a command line option. Sincerely, Enoch. -- ___ Amforth-devel mailing list for http:

Re: [Amforth] uploaded-wl

2014-10-05 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Matthias Trute writes: > Hello Enoch, > >> To extend #require over amforth-shell.py sessions simply add data >> persistence to "self._uploaded = set()". > > Sounds good. If the storage is something that can identify > a particular con

Re: [Amforth] uploaded-wl

2014-10-04 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, To extend #require over amforth-shell.py sessions simply add data persistence to "self._uploaded = set()". See https://docs.python.org/2/library/persistence.html It would be much simpler. Enoch, Your faithful shadow. P/S "spying on developers" was

[Amforth] uploaded-wl

2014-10-03 Thread Enoch
e tests to uploaded-wl existence are annoying. Sincerely, Enoch. -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Rea

[Amforth] star-slash

2014-09-21 Thread Enoch
nce then I implemented the same by my own divide by 64 "63 m* _div64 \ attenuate by × 63/64" but this "*/" word is fundamental. gforth: -128 63 64 */ . -126 ok amforth: > -128 63 64 */ . -1 ok Thanks, Enoch. -

Re: [Amforth] Multitasking + Soft Interrupts

2014-09-13 Thread Enoch
-128 63 64 */ . -126 ok amforth: > -128 63 64 */ . 0 ok Hmm... Regards, Enoch. Matthias Trute writes: > Hi Enoch, > >> I am pleased to advise that I managed "to marry" in amforth-shadow (#1) >> Multitasking with Soft-Interrupts (#2) and have the advan

[Amforth] Multitasking + Soft Interrupts

2014-09-06 Thread Enoch
clude some of my code into your project. Sincerely, Enoch. #1 https://github.com/wexi/amforth-shadow #2 aka Second Level Interrupt Handling (SLIH) -- 4 lib/tasks.frt This is a major rewrite of lib/multitask.frt that is compat

Re: [Amforth] HW flow control

2014-07-23 Thread Enoch
lease be advised that such code exists in amforth-shadow repository <http://tinyurl.com/ldkuouw> and waiting for some day inclusion into AmForth HQ by its BDFL :-) Regards, Enoch. Paolo Garro writes: > Hi Matthias, > I'm writing a wxpython GUI for AMforth. > It's a ser

Re: [Amforth] cmove and cmove>

2014-07-10 Thread Enoch
Sorry Matthias, My mistake, it does check for zero length move. Thanks, Enoch. Matthias Trute writes: > Enoch, > >> I believe that our cmove implementations require a test for zero length >> move. Currently they don't. > > And here is what a small test gives >

[Amforth] cmove and cmove>

2014-07-09 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, I believe that our cmove implementations require a test for zero length move. Currently they don't. Here's what RC2 says: """ 17.6.1.0910 CMOVE “c-move” STRING ( c-addr1 c-addr2 u -- ) If u is greater than zero, c

[Amforth] trunk@1624/5

2014-07-05 Thread Enoch
ry newcomer to AmForth would expect that (preferably using the picture format). Regards, Enoch. -- Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM

Re: [Amforth] Request For Comment: Recognizer

2014-07-01 Thread Enoch
d luck, Regards, Enoch. -- Matthias Trute writes: > Hi, > > Its revealed prematurly (my dear friend Enoch, tss), > but now its good enough for a real annoncement: Recognizers > for all. The basic idea is no

[Amforth] trunk@1619

2014-06-27 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Can you please provide the URL to that RFD covering recognizers: "Renamed to follow RFD Draft". Once things settle I'll try to fix Leon's floating point library. It's there where the problem lies, i.e., re

[Amforth] WORDS

2014-06-01 Thread Enoch
Thanks, Enoch. -- Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes. www.restlet.com/download http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet ___ Amforth-devel mailing list for http

Re: [Amforth] ATmega16 and ATmega128

2014-05-18 Thread Enoch
Michael Kalus writes: > Hi. > > Never split a winning team :-) > Michael > No fear, one can't separate a man from his shadow ;-) Regards, Enoch. > > Am 18.05.2014 um 20:38 schrieb Matthias Trute: > >> Hi Enoch, >> >>> I understand the re

Re: [Amforth] ATmega16 and ATmega128

2014-05-18 Thread Enoch
". However, you have created another forward reference warning, an unnecessary annoyance to a diligent programmer: macros.asm refers to RAMEND which is introduced only later through device.asm. Regards, Enoch. --

Re: [Amforth] ATmega16 and ATmega128

2014-05-14 Thread Enoch
. > > Cool. I've never changed the settings away from 8N1 ;) > Thank you for testing. Fixed in rev 1579 I consider this new line an annoyance: +.warning "The warning regaring XT_NOOP beeing undefined can be ignored"

[Amforth] trunk@1577

2014-05-11 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Please note this new build error: rww.inc(2): error: Illegal use of undefined or forward referenced symbol 'AMFORTH_NRWW_SIZE' in conditional This symbol is now defined nowhere. Thanks, Enoch. ---

Re: [Amforth] New Release: 5.3

2014-05-07 Thread Enoch
) Here's your shadow version in case I am wrong: http://pastebin.com/r8wWiBYh Cheers, Enoch. -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your produ

Re: [Amforth] Living with GPLv2

2014-05-06 Thread Enoch
tly, this would still > be a violation of the GPLv2. > Hi Andreas, Let's agree to disagree; FYI, my client had consulted a patent attorney. As for amforth-shell.py --conceal option, it is now replacing names with base62 numerals so the code is even more compact. Cheers, Enoch. > >

[Amforth] Living with GPLv2

2014-05-06 Thread Enoch
variable ^^8 variable ^^7 variable ^^6 variable ^^5 : ^^68 dup @ 63 um* 64 um/mod swap 31 > if 1+ then &120 @ + swap ! ; No starting of a (un)holy wars please! Do understand that if we wish to make AmForth into anything but a toy we should consider these issues. Thanks, Enoch. P/S A side

Re: [Amforth] NRWW code, etc.

2014-04-29 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Matthias Trute writes: > Enoch, > >> In trunk@1566 you wrote in NRWW.rst that "Furthermore the NRWW section >> cannot self reprogram itself." That isn't true at least on my current >> micro (at90can128). The MCU simply freezes when wr

Re: [Amforth] recipe on writing test cases

2014-04-26 Thread Enoch
> > { 1 1 +-> 2 } >ok > > { 1 1 plus -> 2 } >ok > > { 1 1 plus -> 3 } > INCORRECT RESULT: { 1 1 plus -> 3 } >ok > > { 1 2 plus -> 3 } >ok > > { $ 1 plus

[Amforth] NRWW code, etc.

2014-04-26 Thread Enoch
gt; NRWW_START_ADDR +.include "dict/appl_4k.inc" +.exit +.endif In the remaining core space I pack via dict_appl_core.inc application asm words and additionals from the core. Sincerely, Enoch. -- Start Y

[Amforth] Bootloader

2014-04-16 Thread Enoch
to pack as much as possible code into the core I have to disagree with your static (mcu dependent) allocation method. Instead, a simple macro call ahead of each included asm could have achieved just the same, a macro that checks the "pc" dist

[Amforth] sleep.asm

2014-04-15 Thread Enoch
d to load BOOFA into the core space too), Thanks, Enoch. -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Writte

Re: [Amforth] appl template changes

2014-04-11 Thread Enoch
Hello Mattias, Matthias Trute writes: > Hello Enoch, > >> Apologies for my insistence but couldn't you achieve the same objective >> of packing as many words as possible into the core via a macro call at >> each word that examines the current "pc" again

Re: [Amforth] appl template changes

2014-04-09 Thread Enoch
Enoch writes: > Matthias Trute writes: > >> On Mo, 2014-04-07 at 15:26 -0400, Enoch wrote: >>> Hello Matthias, >>> >>> Matthias Trute writes: >>> > [complaints..] >>> > >>> > Why do you complain? I did not chan

Re: [Amforth] appl template changes

2014-04-08 Thread Enoch
Matthias Trute writes: > On Mo, 2014-04-07 at 15:26 -0400, Enoch wrote: >> Hello Matthias, >> >> Matthias Trute writes: >> > [complaints..] >> > >> > Why do you complain? I did not change that much at all. Your >> >> Your chang

Re: [Amforth] appl template changes

2014-04-07 Thread Enoch
) > boofa is still possible and not worse to add then before. > And all other users will benefit from a lot more code space for > their (forth) programs. > > I updated the template/dict* files with some words of wisdom. Thanks,

Re: [Amforth] appl template changes

2014-04-06 Thread Enoch
Enoch writes: > Re: "Preload as much as possible to NRWW section without user > configuration. There are 3 different sizes for the NRWW section: 2K, > 4K and 8K. For all a pre-selected set of words are included to > maximize the free space for user programs.&q

[Amforth] appl template changes

2014-04-06 Thread Enoch
t you will try to minimize the impact of your development changes on user applications. Today I notice significant changes to appl/template/dict_appl.inc. For example, a new ".include "words/built.asm" Please explain your changes at a greater length than the above SV

Re: [Amforth] New Repository for everone

2014-03-06 Thread Enoch
ish to combine Python + AmForth fun I suggest adding to Keith Amidon's amforth-shell.py interactive terminal capabilities. Python THREADING module is suggested to handle the common serial I/O and CURSES is suggested to easily implement a 25x8

Re: [Amforth] New Repository for everone

2014-03-05 Thread Enoch
'll see. > -Leon Hi Leon, Can you give your github float library a test with the latest AmForth release. It does not seem to work: > pad 10 accept pad swap >float .s 0.15625 #3 0 0 -1 ok That's wikipedia's example <h

Re: [Amforth] New Repository for everone

2014-03-04 Thread Enoch
y won't bother >> > with a project that isn't using git. >> > >> > Andreas Like the previous three commenters I prefer too "The Bazaar" development model; Matthias presumably prefers to live in "The Cathedral" :-) With a click of a

Re: [Amforth] New Repository for everone

2014-03-02 Thread Enoch
s, Leon's included floating point library seems outdated. FYI, he maintains an independent repository at: https://github.com/lnmaurer/amforth-float.git IMO, his library is the kind of code that people expect to be included in amforth main (hardware independent, general applicability). Sincer

Re: [Amforth] (no subject)

2014-02-25 Thread Enoch
lshit > > I aplogize, I dont want to be rude, Enoch. No need, I am aware that my "shadowing you" can be considered an annoyance, but it's good for the project. > Your analysis is wrong. Yes, understoo

Re: [Amforth] (no subject)

2014-02-25 Thread Enoch
ok Only with a serial driver (and a matching computer terminal setting) which implements RTS/CTS handshake (or at least software xon/xoff) you can be sure that characters don't get dropped. I offered a patch for AmForth but Matthias needs further convincing :-) Thanks, Enoch. P/S When prog

[Amforth] #include & #require

2014-02-23 Thread Enoch
ay, as an old C programmer I don't feel comfortable replacing #include with #require :-) Thanks, Enoch. P/S Not that it has any significance, I was the one to have suggested and implemented the conditional shell inclusion directive. ---

Re: [Amforth] Dictionary names obfuscation

2014-02-19 Thread Enoch
ng. You don't want to cache in RAM the memory allocation pointers (EEPROM based DP, HERE, EDP), it's fine with me, I'll do mine the "EESY" way :-) AmForth is your toy, AmForth-Shadow is my derived sandbox. Long live OSS. Regards, Enoch. -

Re: [Amforth] GPL and AmForth

2014-02-19 Thread Enoch
Erich Waelde writes: > Folks, > > On 02/18/2014 10:08 PM, Enoch wrote: >> Hannu Vuolasaho writes: >> >>> First thing about topic. >>> >>> The language which you rae using is forth. it is obfuscated already to 99% >>> of people. :) >

Re: [Amforth] Dictionary names obfuscation

2014-02-18 Thread Enoch
Sam Putman writes: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Hannu Vuolasaho wrote: > >> First thing about topic. >> >> The language which you rae using is forth. it is obfuscated already to 99% >> of people. :) >> >> Secondly it would be sad to lose Enoch

Re: [Amforth] Dictionary names obfuscation

2014-02-18 Thread Enoch
Hannu Vuolasaho writes: > First thing about topic. > > The language which you rae using is forth. it is obfuscated already to 99% of > people. :) > > Secondly it would be sad to lose Enoch from community who has given quite > many ideas. > > Thirdly about GPL. >

Re: [Amforth] Dictionary names obfuscation

2014-02-17 Thread Enoch
h, I think, a detriment to the users. At least you liked my wordlist scope idea ;-) Sincerely, Enoch. writes: > Matthias, > > > > > I am new to this list, so you can ignore me as you like, but I have been > around this industry for a very long time. I have discusse

Re: [Amforth] Dictionary names obfuscation

2014-02-17 Thread Enoch
er to disclose his/her underived and independent code Linux would not have become so popular at the core of commercial products as it is... Just as Sam said, saving code space or feeling no guilt when using long running words is a good enough reason. Sincerely,

[Amforth] Dictionary names obfuscation

2014-02-16 Thread Enoch
forgetting the latter. I must say that there is an element of Flash space saving in this suggestion too. What's your opinon? Thanks, Enoch. P/S Let's start no GPL wars here. I'm not talking about code falling under the GPLv2 license. -

Re: [Amforth] trunk@1512

2014-02-15 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Trying to merge your repository: git-svn-id: svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/amforth/code/trunk@1517 fd1c0b69-5d68-47f5-910c-86182ebb6ecd We seem to miss this definition: enoch@dome:~/avr/amforth$ grep -re "XT_STORE_EE_ARRAY" * core/words/set-recognizer.asm:.dw XT_STOR

Re: [Amforth] trunk@1512

2014-02-13 Thread Enoch
to contribute. See below. I suggest to include it in the kernel. Sincerely, Enoch. -- \ LIFO made FIFO \ ( X1 .. Xn n -- Xn .. X1 n ) : reverse >r sp@ sp@ r@ cells + \ ( bot-addr top-addr ) be

[Amforth] trunk@1512

2014-02-10 Thread Enoch
WORDS1 PFA_ALLWORDS2: .dw XT_EXIT Thanks, Enoch. (*) I want the shell to know all words, not just those at the head of the search order. I am using multiple wordlists. -- Androi apps run on BlackBerry 10 Introducin

Re: [Amforth] TCP/IP Stack

2014-02-08 Thread Enoch
Matthias Trute writes: > Hi, > > Jens wrote a TCP/IP stack for amforth (probably the first FOSS > stack written in forth). The code is now in the > trunk/appl/eval-pollin directory. Not the first yet much appreciated. See http://code.metager.de/source/xref/openfirmware/ofw/inet/

[Amforth] "iplace" to replace "imove"

2014-01-28 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Please note that there are two instances in lib/ans94/core that still use imove. Please grep. What's the background to this change? May I make a wild guess... you're in the midst of implementing Anton Eartl's "Standardize Strings Now!

Re: [Amforth] Forward declarations and sealing them at use-time

2014-01-27 Thread Enoch
ng, with > potentially heavy runtime costs (unless a special wordlist is used). Mitch Bradely forward implementation (in openfirmware) is no trivial either. Thoughts: + Let this "found only forward declaration" throw an exception instead that can be dealt with programmatically, for exa

Re: [Amforth] ALSO

2014-01-26 Thread Enoch
e. I have lots of mutually recusive word definitions like: : A ... ; \ calls B : B ... ; \ calls A and spending one Edefer per each plus another indirect runtime level is unacceptable. I can live with my current hack whic

Re: [Amforth] ALSO

2014-01-26 Thread Enoch
Forth Forth Root Forth ok Vocabulary gives a name to a wordlist yet AmForth lacks this capability. Is it important? No, but I see the advantage for someone doing lots of interactive coding. Regards, Enoch. -- Centur

Re: [Amforth] ALSO

2014-01-26 Thread Enoch
Hi Matthias, Matthias Trute writes: > Hi Enoch, > >> Shouldn't ALSO be corrected as follows: > > ANS94 has in section 16.6.2.0715 ALSO the following specification > > "Transform the search order consisting of widn, ... wid2, wid1 (where > wid1 is searched f

[Amforth] ALSO

2014-01-26 Thread Enoch
er 16 1 16 ok > wordlist constant liby ok > only also liby ok > order 16 2 86 16 ok Thanks, Enoch. -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are C

Re: [Amforth] (defer) elimination

2014-01-20 Thread Enoch
forgetting "foo" after it has been resolved-to... Just as usual, the core idea is simple and straightfowrd (as shown below), the general one quite a challenge. Thanks, Enoch. - \ (one-at-a-time) simple forward refe

Re: [Amforth] (defer) elimination

2014-01-19 Thread Enoch
with mutual recursion without resorting to multiple Edefer's. If you like this approach of eliminating defers (at compile time) we can develop it further. Naming is also temporary, it is influenced by C/C++, etc. Regards, Enoch. -

Re: [Amforth] (defer) elimination

2014-01-19 Thread Enoch
rst1 " forth& ; \ : second1 ." second1" &back& ; \ \ : first2 ." first2 " &forth execute ; \ : second2 ." second2" &back& ; Comments or is this "cookbook grade" :-) Thanks, Enoch. --

[Amforth] Extended VM

2014-01-16 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Your new extended VM words are interesting. Yet, they are not in the emerging 200x standard, not in gforth, not in SwiftForth. Is the reason they did not become popular because they are for a-addr memory access (cell) rather than the more natural c-addr (byte) ? Thanks, Enoch

Re: [Amforth] (defer) elimination

2014-01-14 Thread Enoch
Hi Matthias, Matthias Trute writes: > Hi Enoch, > >> I'm confused, please explain how this works... > > See my last mail, the code does (should do) > exactly what I described there. > >> Aren't we supposed to patch the Edefer caller, not its callee? &

Re: [Amforth] (defer) elimination

2014-01-12 Thread Enoch
hi > \ ' ver is hi > \ ' hi defer:seal > > : defer:seal ( XT -- ) > dup defer@ swap > dup ['] quit @i ( get DO_COLON) swap !i > 1+ dup rot swap !i > 1+ ['] exit swap !i > ; I&

Re: [Amforth] (defer) elimination

2014-01-12 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Matthias Trute writes: > Hi Enoch, > > My recent changes were a code compacting, since defers and values are so > close to each other. > >> May I suggest a new defer object, say, "FFdefer" that would be implemented >> like "Edefer&quo

[Amforth] (defer) elimination

2014-01-12 Thread Enoch
hat if a certain global boolean, say, FastForward, is set then the first "xt_FFdeferfetch" execution will reprogram itself out by changing the calling code. Implmenetation is not difficukt but let me claim for now what Ferma (the mathem

Re: [Amforth] porting amforth to avr-as

2014-01-04 Thread Enoch
mple AVR109 compatible operation (I doubt if any of them is using Forth :-) As they refused to integrate BOOFA in their project, what seems to me so natural, I set up the repository here: https://github.com/wexi/boofa.git Please note that Matthias provided a definition that

Re: [Amforth] amforth/code/trunk@1488

2013-12-30 Thread Enoch
Matthias Trute writes: > Hi Enoch, > > >> Your latest commit to "Speed up defers. And save some code space." >> breaks my _private word list _scope. Compliation hangs. I am sure >> you'll figure out why faster. > > Took me 10 Minutes. Beat this

[Amforth] amforth/code/trunk@1488

2013-12-29 Thread Enoch
Hello Matthias, Your latest commit to "Speed up defers. And save some code space." breaks my _private word list _scope. Compliation hangs. I am sure you'll figure out why faster. TIA, Enoch. - wordlist constant _pri

Re: [Amforth] Multi Line Comments

2013-12-29 Thread Enoch
craig and heather writes: > Enoch > > If that is the case then it is impossible to comment out code if you have > embedded stack diagrams in it. That results in nested comments which are > illegal. > > I guess I'm back to trying to add multi line comments with my own

Re: [Amforth] Multi Line Comments

2013-12-29 Thread Enoch
| |S| 11|2 2 + . |O| 11|4 Regards, Enoch. craig and heather writes: > Enoch, > > I just tried out multi line comments for the first time using the shell and > it doesn't seem to work as I would expect. > > Here is a little bit of the code I am working on > > \

Re: [Amforth] Multi Line Comments

2013-12-28 Thread Enoch
the above via a simple terminal emulator the code still works as the constant PORTE will get created. Regards, Enoch. craig and heather writes: > I know I will probably get flamed for wanting multiline comments but I think > they are really handy when writing / debugging code. > >

Re: [Amforth] Release 5.2 published

2013-12-25 Thread Enoch
up would be happy to do the lobbying for you. Keep up the good work. The Season's Greetings! Enoch. -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear

Re: [Amforth] AmForth vs. Arduino Performance

2013-12-20 Thread Enoch
Hello Erich, Erich Waelde writes: > Hi Enoch, > > On 12/19/2013 03:25 PM, Enoch wrote: >> Hello AmForth-ers: >> >> I don't think that people look for speed when considering any Forth -- >> modern optimizing C compilers will do better. >> >>

Re: [Amforth] AmForth vs. Arduino Performance

2013-12-19 Thread Enoch
nly. Let's start with a common construct such as the "do ... loop" (words/do.asm). It can be a group effort if Matthias encourages :-) Sincerely, Enoch. Matthias Trute writes: > Hello, > >> Has there been any thought about optimizer? > > A lot. And a lot of discuss

Re: [Amforth] 2 quick questions

2013-12-17 Thread Enoch
t you are trying to accomplish I could have been of help :-) Regards, Enoch. -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how applicati

[Amforth] 2 quick questions

2013-12-15 Thread Enoch
VALUEs 435621c * New internal API for values. Thanks, Enoch. -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance af

Re: [Amforth] The new VALUE implementation

2013-12-13 Thread Enoch
Hi Matthias, Matthias Trute writes: > hH Enoch, > >> ... to cache EEPROM values in RAM. Two questions: >> >> 1. Will you apply this soon to "here"? > > pick at least one of the following > > Nostradamus allegedly said, “Prediction is >diff

[Amforth] The new VALUE implementation

2013-12-13 Thread Enoch
EEPROM on start-up, at will sync with the EEPROM ["eesy" :-)] that would be a significant development. Thanks, Enoch. -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organization

Re: [Amforth] (Maybe) obvious tip.

2013-12-08 Thread Enoch
-) Cheers, Enoch. David Wallis writes: > Just solved a problem that's been ticking over in the back of my mind for > weeks, and that has a blindingly obvious solution. Apologies if this is > what people are doing routinely, but it didn't occur to me straight away > and

Re: [Amforth] A shout out to Keith Amidon for amforth-shell.py

2013-12-06 Thread Enoch
obar to please you. > the shell already got a huge number of command line options, so one > more should not hurt that much. Please give some thought to the best way to lower the number of EEPROM rewrite cycles of the pointers. For example, why would we disallow a loop with an infinite

Re: [Amforth] A shout out to Keith Amidon for amforth-shell.py

2013-12-06 Thread Enoch
set TOOLS=%AMFORTH%\tools set AMFORTH_LIB=.:%AMFORTH%\lib C:\Python27\python.exe %TOOLS%\amforth-shell.py -p COM8 ... but on Linux it's so much more fun (for a programmer, I mean). Sincerely, Enoch. -- Sponsored by

Re: [Amforth] A shout out to Keith Amidon for amforth-shell.py

2013-12-05 Thread Enoch
nclude files are really cool features. > > Thanks a bunch Keith Joining your salute, Enoch. As I am fluent in Python I am responsibile for the latest patches. A meta command change that I hope Matthias picks relate to #include and #install. Here's the diff between my amforth-shadow and

Re: [Amforth] Simulation of AVR with Amforth in simavr? (And: Unnescessary multiple writes to EEPROM?)

2013-11-24 Thread Enoch
Erich Waelde writes: > Hi, > > On 11/24/2013 07:13 PM, Enoch wrote: >> Dear Matthias, >> >> I understand that Mikael ("FlashForth") represents "the competition" but >> his point, in my opinion, cannot be ignored. All those frequently >>

Re: [Amforth] Simulation of AVR with Amforth in simavr? (And: Unnescessary multiple writes to EEPROM?)

2013-11-24 Thread Enoch
mforth-shadow in the hope that the boss would change his mind :-) Cheers, Enoch. P/S Minimizing the number of EEPROM erase cycles is a worthy cause. -- Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and

Re: [Amforth] Simulation of AVR with Amforth in simavr? (And: Unnescessary multiple writes to EEPROM?)

2013-11-24 Thread Enoch
s say "eesy" (EEPROM sync), would do the RAM to EE sync. To be on the safe side let tools/amforth-shell.py issue this "eesy" for us automatically before exit... Sincerely, Enoch. Enoch writes: > Mikael Nordman > writes: > >> Hi Wojtek, >> Just to infor

Re: [Amforth] Simulation of AVR with Amforth in simavr? (And: Unnescessary multiple writes to EEPROM?)

2013-11-21 Thread Enoch
suit. The change seems trivial, a simple rewrite of words/dp.asm, etc. I like the recent interest in simavr as a standard devel platform. Can it be used to benchmark, say, AmForth vs. FlashForth? Thanks, Enoch. -- Shape

Re: [Amforth] amforth-shell.py and key word

2013-11-07 Thread Enoch
" > situation too. Perhaps with a prompt change too. > > Better ideas welcome ;) I suggest simply changing read_response(self) in amforth-shell.py to echo characters while waiting for "ok". Regards, Enoch. > > Matthias > > > ---

Re: [Amforth] bitnames.frt

2013-11-06 Thread Enoch
C architecture. Even nicer would be to have just one version to include and deal with the differences via compile time code manipulation (but we don't have working [if] [else] [then] yet). Thanks, Enoch. -- November Webina

  1   2   3   >