Hi all,
I originally posted this in the Boatanchors reflector and know that most
of you's read that forum. This is intended for those who don't (I have
no idea why anyone wouldn't) :-)
I am now the proud parent of a Hallicrafters SX-42 with matching speaker
and manual.
Cosmetically, it is t
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 5:31 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the main purpose of the AMRadio mailing list to respond to
> individuals, or is it to discuss things as a group? If it is for
> *discussion*, then having the default choice as reply to the mailing
> list. Having it set to defau
Actually, Amfone is the sister web site of this list and it has all the
sections you guys mentioned and much more. If you haven't been there take a
look, it's fantastic!
http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php
Rick/K5IAR
Speaking from web-development experience, building a website with some
disk sp
Speaking from web-development experience, building a website with some
disk space for the things Bruce suggested would not be hugely
expensive. I run a personal site, including a domain name and 500MB or
so of disk space, for about €45 per year. All that would be needed is
a few admins to help with
Hello All,
I am not sure how much expansion is possible through qth.net, but I will
suggest what we could do if we are really ambitious: We could get our
own web site.
With our own web site, we would have a place where we could store photos,
manuals, schematics, etc. We could even have an on-l
Yaesu FT-DX-400 400 Watts pep? Pair of 6KD6 finals?
Anyone ever run one of these on AM?
WB5OXQ
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List
>
> The list must have some rules. If not it will turn to complete
> anarchy and go to pot like so many others have in the past.
>
> We are doing the best we can, so please bear with us. We will never
> be able to please all of you, and that is purely fact.
>
> Thanks for your patience & 73
>
> B
Jim,
The TS-930 & TS-930SAT do VERY well on AM. They send TRUE DSB
w/Carrier. They receive AM GREAT!
To transmit AM with it, set carrier to about 20W, turn compression OFF,
and "inch" in the mic gain until you JUST have 100% modulation.
Feed a pair of 3-500Zs. They'll think you are runni
First, I would like to thank all of those who have replied with
positive comments on and off the list to me, and the list as a whole.
I understand that any group of 400+ people is going to have a diverse
range of ideas and opinions on how things need to be. Believe me,
it's not easy for me to mak
For what it's worth:
The Drake TR 4 will do passable AM.It's not spectacular but it works.
Still alot of bang for the buck with that rig and it will handle the less
expensive 6GJ5 tubes in the final amp.
73's
Greg
WA7LYO
Kinston NC
- Original Message -
From: "BSugarberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The drake R8 is likely a nice receiver, but may not be ham ready
with muting and so on. I would look into that.
They are expensive I think.
The NRD-525 may be good, I never had one but talk to people who have them
and they seem to like them.
The others I dont know anything about, but never had an
Now I will reply to this one and say you are 100% right Larry...If the
AM group needs some $$ for more space or what ever count me in...This is
my #1 group... I get more from here then anyother group I am on... This
is a no bickering well moderated group. I monitor this one only all day
long...Were
Hi All,
Maybe we as a group need to belly up to the bar and start adding some
$$ to the till so the AM Radio group can have additional space? I
for one am interested in all the great information that is shared here
but I am also interested in the going prices for equipment.
Maybe if it is made
Ellen Rugowski wrote:
The Viking 2 is basically done - the $75 non-runner I picked up in Nov. 2007 is
up and running. Wahoo!!
Congrats, Ellen! Hope to hear you on the air soon!
I just got done fixing up a junker Viking II for a future AMer (except
he doesn't know it yet!). I got into the
"easier" to have the reply go directly to the sender,
Is the main purpose of the AMRadio mailing list to respond to
individuals, or is it to discuss things as a group? If it is for
*discussion*, then having the default choice as reply to the mailing
list. Having it set to default replies
Hello,
In the May, 2007 issue of Electric Radio, well-known Drake expert Jeff
Covelli, WA8SAJ, describes a simple modification for the Drake TR-7 that
allows it to use the 6 kc AM filter for AM transmitting, (instead of the
default 2.3 kc SSB filter), thus allowing full double sideband AM transm
Hi Bob,
I agree, it would be "easier" to have the reply go directly to the
sender, I was just describing "my" method of doing the same thing.
73, cul...
Bob de k2ki
rbethman wrote:
Bob, Et al,
I have 67 lists that I subscribe to.
I am ONE of those that has fallen on his SWORD over the pas
Thanks to all who responded to me about using the TR-7. I won't buy it
since my audio is good on the kenwood now and I dont want to buy a radio
that would not ke as good on am transmit audio. I will look at buying a
good receiver only and use the 2000 for a transmitter like I do now. thanks
Bob, Et al,
I have 67 lists that I subscribe to.
I am ONE of those that has fallen on his SWORD over the past year - AT
LEAST ONCE - due to a _"PERSONAL"_ message that ended up posted for the
whole WORLD to read!
That is WHY I ask for the change in the REPLY function.
Bob - N0DGN
Bob Bruno
I run Thunderbird here and it gives me the option of right clicking on
the senders name and it will copy the email address to the clipboard. I
then hit reply and substitute the reflectors address with the copied
one. Kind of a pain but it keeps the moderators happy :-)...
73, cul...
Bob de k2k
Jim and Brian,
I'd "like" to see it where if REPLY is clicked it goes to SENDER only.
Reply ALL does just that! It would go to everyone.
That would HAVE to help this latest bout of selling AND buying!
Bob - N0DGN
--
Bob Bethman/NØDGN/BC-610/Northern Radio
SP-600 Manassas, VA - MultiBand Dip
Hi Everybody,
Other than replacing a couple of old caps in the audio section, my Viking 2 is
done. It'll never win awards for its cosmetics (due to Hammy Hambone's
drilling of holes in the front panel, paint chips, and my lack of desire to fix
these cosmetic issues). Last night, I put in the r
AF-68 has been sold, power supply is still available.
PLEASE REPLY DIRECT - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
bob...w2ami wrote:
With all other reflectors the reply would goto the sender
That is not correct. Perhaps other mailing lists that you belong to
are configured that way... but it is definitely not so in all cases.
Steve WD8DAS
Don wrote in part:
I would not consider transmitting with any radio that "simulates AM with a
carrier and only one side band". . . .
and
. . . It doesn't sound good because of fundamental principles of the
modulation and demodulation process.
This is clearly illustrated in a little util
From: "Conor Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just my 2c worth: I'm a newbie to radio, and although I've done a
moderate amount of SWL (with several QSLs) the technical side is new
to me. I'm learning about RF circuits etc, but seeing my inbox filled
with FS and Wanted messages can be somewhat off-pu
Since I trade radios a lot and since the Belton Hamfest is coming soon I
am
looking at several transceivers to trade for. I am also keeping my
TS-B2000
that I use now for everything.
The current choices are;
A Drake TR-7This says it simulates AM with a carrier and only the
upper
side band
Hi Guys;
Someone on this reflector was kind enough to send me a manual on subject.
Unfortunately the schematic is confusing to me. All the lines that cross
each other have no designation as to whether they connect or just cross
unconnected. Usually a schematic will have a dot where lines connect a
John, sometimes in an organization like this it is necessary to have
some house cleaning chores and this is one. It is necessary since we
have new members who were not present when the discussion about the
procedures were carried out.
Once we establish what will occur, then the types of messa
No disrespect or ill will intended, but I agree entirely with John's comments.
The cure is worse than the malady. This is an old dispute. The hosting and
oversight of this list is nonetheless very much appreciated.
73, Jack, W9GT
John Dilks K2TQN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 08:26 P
At 08:26 PM 2/29/2008, you wrote:
If you're going to make a policy, then put the responsibility on the
sellers to post adequate notice about replying off-reflector. If
one of them won't follow the rules, then ban them from selling on
the reflector. Don't penalize everyone for the transgressio
31 matches
Mail list logo
