trapezoid pattern is better, but I never actually hooked up a scope to
get one.
Brett
N2DTS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Macklin
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 6:13 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] 7285Kc tomorrow/S
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of W5OMR/Geoff
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 5:09 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] 7285Kc tomorrow/Saturday
Mark K3MSB wrote:
>Yes. I've tried a scope now and then (I have an old 60 Mhz B&K), but
>truthfully I've never been able
ng an ssb qso right on top of your frequency.
Brett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd, KA1KAQ
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 11:27 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] 7285Kc tomorrow/Saturday
On 1/8/06, Brett gazdz
u
> have one.
>
> John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of W5OMR/Geoff
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 5:09 AM
> To: Discussion of AM Radio
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] 7285Kc tomorrow/Saturday
>
> Mark K
On 1/8/06, Brett gazdzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey gang, just FYI
> I worked KC2IFR (Bill), W3CRR (Craig), KA3ZLR (Jack) today, 40 was much
> better than yesterday.
> Bill has a very good sounding kenwood T599, one of those OLD kenwood twins,
> but I suppose
> some old SSB stuff was e
y 09, 2006 5:09 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] 7285Kc tomorrow/Saturday
Mark K3MSB wrote:
>Yes. I've tried a scope now and then (I have an old 60 Mhz B&K), but
>truthfully I've never been able to really see when the modulation
>level is 100% or other.
Mark K3MSB wrote:
Yes. I've tried a scope now and then (I have an old 60 Mhz B&K), but
truthfully I've never been able to really see when the modulation
level is 100% or other. I know what ideal waveforms look like (with
test inputs), but I have a hard time with a typical speech waveform.
I
Mark K3MSB wrote:
Yes. I've tried a scope now and then (I have an old 60 Mhz B&K), but
truthfully I've never been able to really see when the modulation
level is 100% or other. I know what ideal waveforms look like (with
test inputs), but I have a hard time with a typical speech waveform.
I
On 1/8/06, Brett gazdzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not some kind of 40 meter Nazi, but I like when people tell me
> something has gone
> wacko
I didn't take your posting as being offensive. I too like to be told
if there's something wrong with my signal. As I said, I wish you had
br
> When YHY answered me one of the first things he told me was that my
> audio was low. I looked at the mod current and indeed it was barely
> deflecting on voice peaks. I upped the audio so the mod current was
> where it should be and he said it sounded fine. We were talking for
> about 45 min
On 1/7/06, Brett gazdzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> K3MSB, your audio looked very low on the scope, like 20% modulated,
When YHY answered me one of the first things he told me was that my
audio was low. I looked at the mod current and indeed it was barely
deflecting on voice peaks. I upped
Brian Carling
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 7:04 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] 7285Kc tomorrow/Saturday
I wemnt back to W8VYZ in Ashtabula, OH twice but he couldn't
hear me.
Gary WD4NKA near me worked N4RGR on 7295.
Lousy lousy condx today!
On 7 Jan 2006 at 18:30, Mark K
Hey y'all,
I was in the messy mix this morning on 7285 (about 10 AM EST). I heard
no one, checked for a clear frequency and called CQ. Ashtabula Bill
came back at about 10 over 9 and seemed to be alone. He, however, heard
Paul at equal strength with me. On the second go-round, I heard Paul,
I wemnt back to W8VYZ in Ashtabula, OH twice but he couldn't
hear me.
Gary WD4NKA near me worked N4RGR on 7295.
Lousy lousy condx today!
On 7 Jan 2006 at 18:30, Mark K3MSB wrote:
> Bry (et al):
>
> How'd ya make out? I was on 40 shortly after 9 AM but heard no AM
> activity. I called CQ sev
Bry (et al):
How'd ya make out? I was on 40 shortly after 9 AM but heard no AM
activity. I called CQ several times on 7290 and a very weak station
came back (w4am ??) but couldn't get his call. Afterwards N8YHY came
back and we yakked for about 45 minutes. Wandered down the band
afterwards t
Good suggestion Paul.
I use 7285 a lot anyway.
7290 does get crowded.
See you on AM tomorrow!
Thanks - Brian, AF4K
On 6 Jan 2006 at 4:19, VJB wrote:
> Bry, Gary, Craig,
> If you are planning to get on by 9AM or so, Eastern
> time, why not grab 7283 or 7285Kc instead of higher
> up? This allows
16 matches
Mail list logo
