Eric, earlier this year I went from the FT-847 to the IC-910H and I
couldn't be happier. I used it strictly for satellites.
No question about it, the 847 is an excellent radio; in one respect
it's better than the 910 because it has HF. However, the receiver on
the 910H is far superior to
I/m interested in the possibility of using oscars 27, 29, 50, 51, and 52
without using rotors or directional antennas and maybe while mobile. Uplink
seems not to be a problem as one can always QRO to a level where the
satellite sees an apropriate signal level that is enough but without robing
Hello
While using satpc32 with the lvbtracker I get a Ungulltige Gleitkammaoperation
error message along with that bad thunk sound. What's going on??
73 Bob W7LRD
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not
Bob,
That messages translates to Invalid floating decimal point operation, so
perhaps reload the software?
Glenn AA5PK
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the
Hey Eric,
I aggree with the comments on the hand held antenna. I use the Elk exclusively
at this point but would like to find a base antenna option. I cannot use beams
of rotored antennas as I just don't have the real estate.
I have met folks on this board who totaly believe in eggbeaters,
I have an arrow. It's just sorta difficult to point when in motion. Is the
pattern from a standard mobile whip really enough considering polorization
and radiation angle or would something else be more effective? I'm looking
to move from working portable to truly mobile.
Eric
AF6EP
On Fri,
