Because we asked that we be treated in exactly the manner you described
and were rebuffed.
Bob
John P. Toscano wrote:
Bob McGwier wrote:
ANY aspect dealing with a satellite, software, hardware, ground
stations (hardware, software, protocols, etc.), ideas, random
ejaculations from a
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Bill Ress b...@hsmicrowave.com wrote:
This continues to be a real sore spot with
University research programs on things related to satellites or any of
the areas subject to ITAR. It's get especially tricky when students,
which are foreign nationals, try to
As was commented earlier ITAR certainly does makes it tricky when try to sell
something to an American customer who isn't allowed to tell you what they want.
Am I right in thinking the penalty for a US citizen who incorrectly interprets
ITAR and inadvertantly breaches it can be a 4 figure fine
Thank-you, Daniel for this helpful reply. Your 'diode' analogy was excellent.
Using the links provided by Samudra above, I was able to find some
parts of ITAR that exempt Canada. Specifically, 126.5(b), which in
turn has restrictions on *it* in the following passages. One of these
restrictions is
k0...@juno.com wrote:
Hi Bob (N4HY)
Thanks for taking the time to ponder for the BB and me some of the twists
and turns
of ITAR issues.
I hope the BB apprecaites your time and effort.
Here are a few more questions?
8.) How do exclusionary zones with in the US work as in the AO-40
Trevor . wrote:
As was commented earlier ITAR certainly does makes it tricky when try to sell
something to an American customer who isn't allowed to tell you what they
want.
Am I right in thinking the penalty for a US citizen who incorrectly
interprets ITAR and inadvertantly breaches it
Bruce Robertson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:31 PM, k0...@juno.com wrote:
Hi Bob (N4HY)
Thanks for taking the time to ponder for the BB and me some of the twists
and turns
of ITAR issues.
I hope the BB apprecaites your time and effort.
Here are a few more questions?
I
Thanks for the clarification.
It might appear that those who join the AMSAT-NA board risk personal ruin
should they inadvertantly misinterpret Federal Government regulations.
http://www.ka9q.net/export/history.html
http://www.ka9q.net/export/3des.html
73 Trevor M5AKA
Someone mentioned waaay back in this discussion something about ITAR and
international students being taught in the US. Read this article:
http://slashdot.org/story/09/10/17/1948223/The-USs-Reverse-Brain-Drain
Is there anyone left in our government with common sense any more?
Wait... gah!!!
k0...@juno.com wrote:
Greetings All:
The Amsat BB is a great source of information we all know:
I have a few questions about ITAR that I thought might interest more than
I.
I tried to be careful of the words I used.
1.) Do all launched satellites that have US components or interests
Hi,
if anyone is interested to investigate ITAR regulations further, they
will have to dig into the published documents at various Dept of
Commerce and other websites. However, here is a blank template in line
with http://pmddtc.state.gov/regulations_laws/itar_official.html, just
in case, a US
Hi Bob (N4HY)
Thanks for taking the time to ponder for the BB and me some of the twists
and turns
of ITAR issues.
I hope the BB apprecaites your time and effort.
Here are a few more questions?
8.) How do exclusionary zones with in the US work as in the AO-40
integration and shipping
zone,
Thanks Bruce (VE9QRP)
All Amateur Satellite ITAR Questions are welcome Bruce.
Thanks
Joe K0VTY
==
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:11:38 -0300 Bruce Robertson ve9...@gmail.com
writes:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:31 PM, k0...@juno.com wrote:
Hi Bob (N4HY)
Thanks for taking the time
Thanks Samudra
All knowledge about the issues effecting Amateur Satellites and ITAR
rules / laws
for the membership are appreciated.
Thanks
Joe Murray K0VTY
===
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:16:54 -0400 Samudra Haque
samudra.ha...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
if anyone is interested to
Bruce Robertson wrote:
Given that AMSAT-NA is by definition a collaboration between amateurs
on both sides of the US/Canada border, do we have a clear idea where
ITAR stands with respect to Canadian collaborators? I know that in
1999 the previous exemption was revoked, but that in 2001 there
15 matches
Mail list logo
