Ops!! It should read," Has any progress been done."
- Original Message -
From: "Angelo Glorioso"
To: "AMSATBBS"
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:14 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] New Control Software
>
> Hi Drew,
>
> I was wondering if any process has done on getting the BBS back on V/U
> a
Angelo Glorioso wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> I was wondering if any process has done on getting the BBS back on V/U
> again? I know the new control software cause some problems with the UHF
> receiver but I figured it has been over 2 years now since that update.
>
> Can you shed some light here
I see! As for low usage of the BBS, well, most of the folks that used GO-32
either don't have 1.2g or have not been able to get into the AO-51 BBS at
all
since the new configuration was put in place. I have been unable to use
AO-51 BBS with
a 70 watts brick on 1.2g, a directives system 23 cm RH
Angelo Glorioso wrote:
>
> I see! As for low usage of the BBS, well, most of the folks that used
> GO-32
> either don't have 1.2g or have not been able to get into the AO-51 BBS
> at all
> since the new configuration was put in place. I have been unable to
> use AO-51 BBS with
> a 70 watts brick
I appreciate the helpful hints. I will try it again once it comes back
up on 1.2.
Again, thanks for all your efforts in keeping AO-51 one of the leading
satellites to use.
My hat off to you!! :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Glasbrenner"
To: "Angelo Glorioso"
Cc: "AMSATBBS"
on
> Behalf Of Angelo Glorioso
> Sent: Friday, 19 February 2010 14:07
> To: Andrew Glasbrenner
> Cc: AMSATBBS
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: New Control Software
>
>
> I appreciate the helpful hints. I will try it again once it comes back
> up on 1.2.
>
> Again, thanks fo
Hurst"
To:
Cc: "Angelo Glorioso" ; "Andrew Glasbrenner"
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 6:36 PM
Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: New Control Software
> Angelo,
> Further to Drew's comments I would confirm the 1268.703 uplink.
> One further hint besides devia
