..@aol.com; Ben Jackson
> Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: OT: Universal Text Messaging and
> Pagers (WAS Re: Re:dream)
>
> > Ben, I agree we need a ruling on this
> > I think part 97 is vauge and vauge for a reason
>
> THIS IS INSANITY
>
At 09:53 AM 7/9/2009, Bob Bruninga wrote:
>THe worst part of amateur radio is all the nit-pickers and ankle
>biters that hold back progress. Sometimes they win and the guy in
>the lead just gives up. SOmetimes these guys with an idea get far
>enough ahead of the nit-pickers and ankle biters, t
> Ben, I agree we need a ruling on this
> I think part 97 is vauge and vauge for a reason
THIS IS INSANITY
The FCC is nothing but a bunch of bureaucrats trying to sell off spectrum to
the highest bidder! There are no real engineers left there, and no one there
with OUR interest in mind.
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 16:06 +, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote:
> No we don't.
> The FCC are obviously happy to allow us to do what we do now.
>
> If you stir up trouble and get things banned, there are going to be an awful
> lot of pissed amameurs after your arse.
"easier to ask forgiveness th
At 04:05 AM 7/8/2009, kd8...@aol.com wrote:
>So let's say I know your personal capcode - I send to you making a
>call up now "KF8II de KD8BXP pls call on 40meter 7.100 at 2200z"
>
>I think that would be 100% legal. So it is all about content and not
>about the techonolgy of it being a oneway dev
At 02:06 AM 7/8/2009, Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF wrote:
>No we don't.
>The FCC are obviously happy to allow us to do what we do now.
I agree. I believe it's counterproductive going off and making noise
to the relevant Government authority (FCC, Ofcom, ACMA, Industry
Canada, etc). The rules are the
Good afternoon to all -
On the subject of amatuer paging
While in an email letter to Nigel (sorry I don't remember his call)
I may have just convenced (sp) myself that paging is probably perfectly legal
in the ham bands
Let's see if I can follow my own logic and then let's get a paging network
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Jackson"
To: "Bob Bruninga"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 11:20 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: OT: Universal Text Messaging and Pagers (WAS Re:
Re:dream)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bob Bruninga wrote:
>
&
"Whenever you get in bed with the Federal government, you often get
more than just a good night's sleep." Ronald Regan.
Translation: Don't ask for a ruling unless prepared to hear something
you won't like.
Better to proceed in good faith and sort out the matter only if needed.
I hope this
No we don't.
The FCC are obviously happy to allow us to do what we do now.
If you stir up trouble and get things banned, there are going to be an awful
lot of pissed amameurs after your arse.
kd8...@aol.com wrote:
> Ben, I agree we need a ruling on this I think part 97 is vauge and vauge for
>
Ben, I agree we need a ruling on this I think part 97 is vauge and vauge for a
reason
What we need is to setup a confrance call or something so we can get a well
written letter together and get it off to someone who can make a ruleing at the
FCC
Skype, echolink, dstar or something where those
11 matches
Mail list logo
