From: "i8cvs"
To: ; ; "AMSAT-BB"
; "Auke de Jong, VE6PWN"
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 7:59 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: accidental satellite ops
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To: ; ;
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 9:52 P
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 9:52 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: accidental satellite ops
> Glen,
> (I was a member of sbms that built the 2.3 GHz transponder that was never
> allowed activation).
> 73, Ed - KL7UW
Hi Ed, KL7UW
A
That clears that up!
Glen, K9STH
Website: http://k9sth.com
--- On Thu, 9/17/09, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
The July/August 2002 AMSAT Journal has a copy of the waiver on page 25, dated
April 19, 1974.
At the time of the construction of the satellite, there was no separate amateur
satellit
The July/August 2002 AMSAT Journal has a copy of the waiver on page 25,
dated April 19, 1974.
At the time of the construction of the satellite, there was no separate
amateur satellite service. By the time of the launch, there was, and it
was 435-438 only, hence the waiver.
73, Drew KO4MA
_
I went back in my copies of the AMSAT Newsletter (I have virtually all of them
starting with Volume I, Number 2, dated October 1969 - I joined AMSAT the 2nd
month of the organization's existence) and the only mention of a waiver was
that due to the control requirements that a waiver was requeste
Original Message:
-
From: Glen Zook gz...@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org, sparkyci...@shaw.ca
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: accidental satellite ops
The primary problem is that the OSCAR VII inputs are now in the weak signal
portions of the
The primary problem is that the OSCAR VII inputs are now in the weak signal
portions of the "band plans". With the proliferation of FM activity the weak
signal portions have been compressed. It is unrealistic to even think of
"blaming" the weak signal operators for interfering with OSCAR VII o
maybe the best one can do is to send QSL cards noting the time/freq/sat/mode
to the ops. Of course this assumes that their callsign can be understood
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 2:46 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] accidental satellite ops
>
>
>
> I notice
Actually Larry that was the band plan back in 1974. Who would think we would
still have it 35 years later. The satellite is older than many the the ops.
Looking foward the the "rebirth" of AO-40 (sobsob).
73 Bob W7LRD
Seattle
a Pacific
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] accidental satelli
I heard this during the ARRL UHF contest back in August as well and found it
amusing. They are correct, though, and not violating the bandplan as the AO7
uplink is in the weak signal part of the band-that is what happends when your
satellites lives for 35 years-band plans change
It would be ni
Certainly word needed to local clubs, vhf clubs, contesting clubs about
this anamoly. Indeed they are oblivious to where their signal is going
and how. Too little attention is paid to band plans. Good snooping
Bob.
See you soon on the birds.
73, Larry W7IN DN27 Montana -- see you soon on th
11 matches
Mail list logo
