Anyone else having issues getting into LoTW?
Zack
KD8KSN
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailm
Hi all,
My logs are all current on LoTW. I am beginning to see new calls for my
satellite contacts showing up. Still like them old fashion paper cards
though. I will continue to upload every evening after the last pass.
73,
Bob AJ5C
___
Sent via AMSA
I have been using LOTW and eQSL for over a year now. And it appears some
are just entering their contacts now since it supports VUCC. I enter my
contacts manually and sometimes I make a mistake when transferring from
paper to electronic. So if anyone gets a rejection of my call, don't
hesitate t
Went through no problem Good Deal!!!
Pretty easy like I said I was discouraged for a long time but now I am glad I
tried it.
Now can I search for stuff others have uploaded that I may not have logged and
match theirs???
Kevin
KF7MYK
Hi all,
All my contacts for HI4/AJ5C have been uploaded to Lotw under that call.
They have also been uploaded to Eqsl. Paper QSL's are due in next week
and will have them out shortly thereafter.
73,
Bob Herrell
AJ5C
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org.
i have decided to try lotw again after using it in 2003 and having a
miserable time with it. i need to find someone that i have had a
satellite qso with that has uploaded their log so i can change that
record or two and then see if i get a match before i try to modify each
of my 6500 satellite
I just completed uploading all my satellite QSO's to LOTW, 1993-2001. I
only did a handful of satellite contacts after that with my HT which I
also uploaded.
It took a little bit of programming to convert the old storage locations
of data (pre-LoTW) to the LoTW fields. I even uploaded my trips
i had so much fun the past few weeks loading all my satellite qso's up
on lotw that i thought i would do it for my daughter's (w5bts) log. i
just finished loading her 520 satellite qso's from 2000-2003 and she
wound up with 19 matches. of those, 2 had cards sent with no return, 3
never had card
Although the LoTW FAQ shows "ARISS" and "AO-7" as the valid satellite names,
TQSL bounced all of my QSOs for those two for "Invalid Satellite Name"... I
looked in the ADIF file, and the Sat_Name fields are all correct, and it
processed all of my other QSOs successfully. I also tried "ISS" and
A bit late for me, but here is what the ARRL LoTW page says today:
"Dec 22, 2010: VUCC Award Support Testing -- VUCC support is being installed
and tested. When this upgrade is implemented, amateurs can use LoTW to apply
for awards based on Maidenhead grid squares, such as VUCC and the Fred Fis
Hi All,
I am trying to get myself going on LoTW, and I need to know what the generally
excepted parameters are for QSO information.
1) In my logbook (HRD), what should I put for the freq. (2m, 440)?
2) What happens if my log entry is one minute off of stations B’s entry (1906z
versus 1905z)
I have yet to hear
the exact allowable clock difference, but I'm sure it is several minutes at
least.
>
> 73,
> Joe kk0sd
>
> -Original Message-
> From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Zachary Beougher
> Sent: Monday, Janu
d read in the instructions
about how you could cut and paste the changed in the ADIF file, but after
trying that it would take just as long to make the changes in HRD.
73!
Zack
KD8KSN
-Original Message-
From: Gary "Joe" Mayfield
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 1:52 PM
To:
Is there anyone intersted in helping me with LOTW? I did all the requirements,
do I upload all my qso's individually? and how do I know if the other guy is
going to do the same? Maybe someone on here could do an old qso we have
together and I could see how it works?
Thanks for any help! :)
Anyone help me figure out how to post a sat contact to LOTW from AcLOG; have
spoken to both ARRL and AcLOG folks was like duh? ARRL is asking for
fields that seem like duplicates to me, RX freq, RX Bandpropagation
mode, mode...and they are not available in AcLOG.
Any help appreciated. May
Any body know why LOTW will not accept HO-68 as a sat name?
Larry W7IN
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http:/
I agree with Jack and Tim, LOTW is great (albeit more complicated than it needs
to be).
For those who do not like the fees and complexities of LOTW, I'd like to remind
everyone of eQSL, which is a cheaper and simpler supplement to LOTW. It's
simpler because most logging programs will automatic
We now know more about the VUCC fee changes than
we did when the discussion started thanks to comments
by Bill Moore and others. As someone stated, the
sticker shock has everyone upset. If the costs of
the VUCC program justify what is being charged, there's
not much you can do about it unless you
and in my wallet for an 8 x 10 award paper.
Respectfully submitted, Ted, K7TRK
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of John Papay
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 12:32 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] LOTW & VUCC Discussion
We now know more
All 48 of my SO-67 contacts have been uploaded to LoTW.
73,
Bob AJ5C
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://ams
I'm trying to validate my callsign on LOTW however to do this, as I am
outside the US I need to mail some supporting documents. The help file
directs me to https://www.arrl.org/lotw/docreq however this url does
not exist!
Can anyone tell me where I need to send the supporting documents?
Thanks
P
It seems that ARRL finally brought together a team of crack software
engineers to edit the satellite config file in Logbook of the World so it
would accept QSO's made on HO-68. Unfortunately, it looks they did not
have enough keystrokes available to also add SO-67. Perhaps next year...
John - VE
Apparently I was doing something wrong. I now see the same station from
different grid squares for a couple of calls. I believe it is working just
as it should.
73,
Joe kks0d
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the aut
Hi,
I just upload several hundred sat contacts to LOTW. Many matches were
returned, BUT many of them were credited for "VUCC 144 mhz" or "VUCC 432 mhz"
and NOT for "VUCC Satellite", which is how they should be credited.
Does this mean that the person on the other side of the QSO did not proper
Any news on if LoTW will support HO-68? I've emailed the ARRL but
haven't heard anything back.
-Reid
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program
I'm now logging all my satellites contacts and trying to upload them
every couple of days to the ARRL Logbook of the World (LoTW). So far, so
good with just over 25 grids confirmed via LoTW.
Only hitch so far is when I tried to upload my two digital contacts,
made using packet through the ISS
One of my winter projects is to get all of my OSCAR contacts back to 1989 in
LOTW. Unfortunately, my older logs are not available.
What are folks doing about contacts made on RS-10/11? My log book says
RS-10/11 and LOTW wants either RS-10 or RS-11 and I really don't have a way
to tell which?
27 matches
Mail list logo