On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Arnaud Voermans wrote:
Thanks Tim, got that working but it spits out html results in telnet, am I
missing another parameter to specify the output filename?
analog outfile
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical
Set the ARGSFLOOR higher.
--
Stephen Turner[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge CB2 1SB, England
"We can ask you to pay the full amount which you owe us if you:
(a) become bankrupt; or (b) die." Egg Credit Card
hmm ...
very often when one compiles software, for example ssh-1.2.27, then one must do the
following:
./configure
make
make install
With analog, one just does "make" ... and the rest you should do yourself. Thus, why
isn't there a
"make install" script? Hmm, since I'm quite new to this
hallo ...
Well, from what I have already seen in my short time on this list, the install
problems come from
people using Linux who may not be linux guru's.
If a "make install" script does not fit into the analog concept, then there should be
some type of
guidance for users with less
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, tim wrote:
hallo ...
Well, from what I have already seen in my short time on this list, the install
problems come from
people using Linux who may not be linux guru's.
If a "make install" script does not fit into the analog concept, then there should
be some type
Stephen Turner wrote:
Aside: I've never been clear why people expect "make install" anyway on a
Linux system (I understand it on Unix). On my Debian Linux system I have
never compiled anything myself. Everything I have ever wanted is provided as
a .deb, so I never have type "make" at all.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
But I've noticed many times that installing with .configure; make; make
install is faster and simpler than packages. Usually because the source
files are easier to find than the package. Also, I have often found
programs I wish to install that
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [analog-help] What referrer format is expected in the
log-files?
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Jos Groot Lipman wrote:
205.188.197.59 - -
hallo ...
my first experience with analog was with the FreeBSD port.
The FreeBSD is a small collection of script files, which fetch and install the
software for you.
For analog, for example, all I had to do was this:
cd /usr/ports/www/analog
su
make install make clean make distclean
and
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Jos Groot Lipman wrote:
Unfortunately I have no control over how the server is configured so I'll
have to do with the format as shown above. I can easily write a program to
transform it into any format. I just need to know the target format as
interpreted by Analog.
10 matches
Mail list logo
