hi everyone,
can this be viewed thru analog's output ? i.e., stats stating the number of
unique visitors (or IP adds) fro the day, week and month.
tia,
chad
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe
can this be viewed thru analog's output ? i.e., stats stating the
number of unique visitors (or IP adds) fro the day, week and month.
unique visitors are a figment of a marketer's imagination. No way a Web
server can tell you that. "why Log stats are completely useless (or worse)"
explains
Walter,
unique visitors are a figment of a marketer's imagination. No way a Web
server can tell you that. "why Log stats are completely useless (or worse)"
explains it nicely. It's linked at in Analog's docs, if I remember well.
A report on where (some of the) visitors coem from is in the HOST
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 12:05:08PM +0200, Walter Vannini wrote:
Hi Christian,
True, but the trouble is that some of us work in intense colaboration
with marketers, and have daily demands for the number of visits,
true. I do.
i do also. in analog's "General Summary" theres a table
Hi Chad,
True, but the trouble is that some of us work in intense colaboration
with marketers, and have daily demands for the number of visits,
true. I do.
i do also. in analog's "General Summary" theres a table saying "Distinct Hosts
Served" ... but thats only for the entire span of
i do also. in analog's "General Summary" theres a table saying
"Distinct Hosts Served" ... but thats only for the entire span of
time covered by the logs. is there any way for us to determine the
number of disticnt hosts served on a daily, weekly and monthly basis ?
KISS, right?
I don't want to sound negative about Analog - its great as a general
guide to what going on. But surely if you want detailed analysis for
Marketers you need a more detailed(?) product i.e. WebTrends??
Brian
Hi Chad,
True, but the trouble is that some of us work in intense colaboration
Brian,
I don't want to sound negative about Analog - its great as a general
guide to what going on. But surely if you want detailed analysis for
Marketers you need a more detailed(?) product i.e. WebTrends??
That's what I was considering a few mails back, but I'm not quite
sure about the
Well here's my tuppence worth;
I don't think that you can say that WebTrends is 'much more detailed' than
Analog. I do think you can say that WebTrends is vastly more 'creative' than
Analog. The reasons for this are beautifully outlined in the 'what you can
and can't do' section of the Analog
On Mon, 22 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I get the error message "bad argument in configuration command"
"time without date or vice versa".
Is this caused by the fact that the data in each line of the log only
contains the %M and %d and does not contain a year?
Do I have to
Should do but doesn't, although I'm quite prepared to accept the possibility
that I've been looking at for too long today. : )
I think this may be because I have specified a custom log in terms of which
things get logged ( #Fields: date time c-ip cs-method cs-uri-stem sc-status
sc-bytes cs-bytes
On Mon, 22 May 2000, William Martin wrote:
hi there,
our webserver is configured to display a customized page instead of the
plain 404 Not Found error message. I want to count this as a pageview, but
looking at the logs I see that many 404s also come up for missing images. I
only want to
Hey everyone!
When I try to run stats for this site it takes about 250 minutes to finish.
I have DNS lookups on, but does it really take that long? If not, what
should I be looking into?
Thanks in advance!
Brent Bierstedt
I've been struggling to reconcile webtrends and analog reports for quite
some time now, with some success. to be safe we run both, and compare the
numbers regularly. I mostly prefer analog, it's more 'low-level', intuitive
and accurate, not to mention faster (in fact, I just ran some sample
Brian Clifton wrote:
I have not done a direct comparision, but I am pretty sure as far as bare
facts go they would be the same. If you have an example where WT has
produced pure twoddle, please post.
There was a post re: this matter two weeks agon when W*bTr*ends came up on the
list. Check
There was a post re: this matter two weeks agon when W*bTr*ends came up on
the list. Check the archives around May 10th for Jim Sander's strong
dismissal of the product's claimed reliability.
I will have a read of this.
Report Magic will provide you all the fancy reports, graphs, and
I have looked FAQ section C4 and did not find any information regarding
Successful requests Average successful requests per day. Is there any
explanation on to why the number of successful requests and the number of
Average successful request per day are not the same? Every time I run the
The most likely cause is that Analog doesn't think that the time period
is exactly a day. Analog tends to use the first hit time and the last hit
time as the time period covered. Check out the end of the line in the
header that starts 'Analyzed requests from'. The last thing on that line
On Tue, 23 May 2000, William Martin wrote:
what about:
STATUSINCLUDE 404
FILEEXCLUDE *.gif,*.jpg,*.jpeg
would it only count page 404s if done in this order?
Yes. But they will still show up in the Failure Report not the Request
Report.
also, on which version of analog was
Greetings,
I have looked at the mail archive and saw several threads on this topic but
no answers - good or bad. I also looked at the FAQ and also didn't see any
help there. So, if I missed something, please point me again in the right
direction.
My LOG File format shows this (as all one line):
Ian Stong wrote:
I've read through the docs and archives and found some ways to implement
my setup. Looking for someone with experience to recommend the "best"
solution. I have 100 virtual servers all with different log files and
different domain names.I would like to analyze
Hello,
Ok here is the deal. I have been playing around with Analog since
version 4.0 and now need some tips and other gouge. Can someone
offer some basic configs that might be helpful. I have read through
the FAQ and it provided some very good info. I was just wondering
if any of ya'll that
22 matches
Mail list logo
