Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2004-01-19 Thread analog-help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Monday, January 19, 2004 8:39 AM): > Can someone tell me what I should look at to determine why the report is empty? > Is it one of the Floor options? > If so, which one plse. No. Floor settings just determine which items will be collected into the "Not Lis

RE: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2004-01-19 Thread analog-help
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy Wadsack > Sent: 14 January 2004 17:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2004-01-15 Thread analog-help
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Jeremy Wadsack wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:41 AM): > > > I'm not even sure what "Processing Time" means (!), not having seen sample output > > I hope it would analyse the %T above... > > The time it takes to read files. It's n

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2004-01-14 Thread analog-help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:41 AM): > Can anyone provide me with an example of the results of the > Processing Time report and how to define it in the CFG? This will turn on the report, provided there is data for it: PROCTIME ON > I'm using A

[analog-help] Processing Time Report

2004-01-14 Thread analog-help
Can anyone provide me with an example of the results of the Processing Time report and how to define it in the CFG? I'm using Analog 5.32 and Apache v1.3 I have defined a custom LogFormat as APACHELOGFORMAT (%h %t %T \"%r\" %>s %b) which records response time in integral seconds (at v1.3) I'm

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report 2

2003-02-04 Thread analog-help
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Roger Perttu wrote: > Hi! > > In the Processing time report, is it possible to get a list of the 10 > files that have the longest processing time? There is a date of last > access but afik no file name or url of last access. > See docs/faq.html#faq128 -- Stephen Turner, C

[analog-help] Processing Time Report 2

2003-02-04 Thread analog-help
Hi! In the Processing time report, is it possible to get a list of the 10 files that have the longest processing time? There is a date of last access but afik no file name or url of last access. Thanks, Roger P + | TO UNS

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2003-02-03 Thread analog-help
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thanks for the quick reply : I guess that entries with 0 time are coming > from a cache and not the web-process. > > However, surely 0 secs should be counted in the <= 0.01 bucket? (this > would be logical and less confusing?) > No, because th

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2003-02-03 Thread analog-help
TECTED] site.net> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report owner-analog-

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2003-02-03 Thread analog-help
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am puzzled by the 0 seconds #reqs (101173) - how do I interpret this > number and why is the <=0.01 secs reading 0 ? > > I am about to make significant changes in our website and I am worried what > the impact on processing time will be - so I w

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2003-02-03 Thread analog-help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; Monday, February 03, 2003 12:52 PM): > In the Processing time report I typically see the following : > seconds: #reqs: > -: --: > 0: 101173: > <= 0.01: 0: > 0.01-0.02: 39560: > 0.02-0.05: 19315: > 0.05-0.1 : 36931: > 0.1 -0.

[analog-help] Processing Time Report

2003-02-03 Thread analog-help
In the Processing time report I typically see the following : seconds: #reqs: -: --: 0: 101173: <= 0.01: 0: 0.01-0.02: 39560: 0.02-0.05: 19315: 0.05-0.1 : 36931: 0.1 -0.2 : 59912: 0.2 -0.5 : 99683: 0.5 -1 : 41842: 1- 2 : 25532: 2- 5 : 13132: 5- 10

RE: [analog-help] Processing Time report - time ranges

2002-04-19 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Michael Rabe wrote: > Stephen - thanks for the quick response. > > Is this something we might see as configurable in a subsequent release? > Well, a lot of people have asked for it, so it might happen. It's not entirely straightforward though. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridg

RE: [analog-help] Processing Time report - time ranges

2002-04-18 Thread Michael Rabe
: [analog-help] Processing Time report - time ranges On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Michael Rabe wrote: > The Processing Time report has a lovely pie chart and some text as follows: > > > seconds: reqs: > ---: : > 0: 207: > 1:8: > 2: 56: > 3

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time report - time ranges

2002-04-18 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Michael Rabe wrote: > The Processing Time report has a lovely pie chart and some text as follows: > > > seconds: reqs: > ---: : > 0: 207: > 1:8: > 2: 56: > 3- 5: 47: > 5- 10:1: > > > Is there a way to change the ranges fo

[analog-help] Processing Time report - time ranges

2002-04-18 Thread Michael Rabe
The Processing Time report has a lovely pie chart and some text as follows: seconds: reqs: ---: : 0: 207: 1:8: 2: 56: 3- 5: 47: 5- 10:1: Is there a way to change the ranges for which the times are captured? Our client wants to know "percenta

Re: [analog-help] Processing Time Report

2001-05-17 Thread Stephen Turner
On Thu, 17 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hallo, > > I'd like to have the Processing Time Report in my report file. The analog > says, this report is excluded, because the log file does not contain the > necessary information. I know I should custiomize Apache's log output to > force loggin

[analog-help] Processing Time Report

2001-05-17 Thread Christian . Schildt
Hallo, I'd like to have the Processing Time Report in my report file. The analog says, this report is excluded, because the log file does not contain the necessary information. I know I should custiomize Apache's log output to force logging this information by setting the parameter %T. My questio