Hi.!! I have a problem, frecuently when I'm running analog appear
this error:
./analog: Fatal error: Ran out of memory: cannot continue: exiting
Then I must add this lines in the analog.cfg:
HOSTLOWMEM 3
USERLOWMEM 3
FILELOWMEM3
REFLOWMEM
Hi Josue,
how about some more info about how big log files are you analyzing etc...?
Thanks,
Josef D.
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Josue Aguilar wrote:
Hi.!! I have a problem, frecuently when I'm running analog appear
this error:
./analog: Fatal error: Ran out of memory: cannot continue: exiting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about some more info about how big log files are you analyzing etc...?
Also the OS you are running under would help. If you're running under
OpenVMS you may be exceeding your account quotas or the pagefile may not
be large enough for what you are trying to do.
Josue Aguilar wrote:
Hi.!! I have a problem, frecuently when I'm running analog appear
this error:
./analog: Fatal error: Ran out of memory: cannot continue: exiting
Then I must add this lines in the analog.cfg:
HOSTLOWMEM 3
USERLOWMEM 3
FILELOWMEM3
REFLOWMEM 3
But I don't know why
Hi.! well my log files have an average size of 700Mb (each day
counting all servers).
Thanks.!!!
Hi Josue,
how about some more info about how big log files are you analyzing
etc...?
Thanks,
Josef D.
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Josue Aguilar wrote:
Hi.!! I have a problem, frecuently when I'm
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
Stangely enough (and maybe Stephen can shed light on this) is that the domain
report, which was included in all runs, had different number with all LOWMEMs at
3 than with HOSTLOWMEM 2. Shouldn't the count be the same if the report is going
to be
I just wanted to follow-up on this thread for anyone else looking at processing
large logfiles. In testing Analog on the stats files, *LOWMEM 3 was able to run
within the memory space of the server. We subsequently ran each of the LOWMEM
options at 2, one at a time. Then used a script to collect
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Tristan Lawrence wrote:
I think Analog is a wonderful program, but for whatever reason it uses
an absolutely ridiculous amount of memory doing large reports like this.
My script unquestionably takes a long time to run (hours) but is
dramatically more memory-efficient
Hi Stephen
I think that is it. This site (nypost.com) typically has 5-10 million
hits a day-on over 2.5 million distinct files. I can't imagine how many
distinct files in a month but it must be a huge number. So Analog would
need gigabytes and gigabytes of RAM to keep track of all of those
I am running analog on a machine that has 14G of memory, disk space a couple
of tarabytes. I am trying to run a monthly report (just for march) and i
keep running out of memory. I get this message from the my error log. And
Yes I have set hostlowmem to 3 and filelowmem to 3. I also have cache
I have attached a perl script I used to get around a similar problem
(although I only had 1.5 GB of memory not 14 Gb!!!)
It runs each day seperately and combines the output.
Tristan
Fiorela Gonzalez wrote:
I am running analog on a machine that has 14G of memory, disk space a couple
of
Tristan,
You have to be careful with this script: The problem is that each month only
contains the collected stats of each day. This means the data at the bottom of
each time report may not be accurate (in fact all the numbers could be
inaccurate). When you produce the reports, Analog cuts off
Good point, and thanks for your comments-not to mention the lucid
example!
I'm not sure that would be a problem, though. As I recall (I wrote this
a while ago) the script collects all of the stats for a particular day;
it doesn't limit them at all. The filtering takes place when it outputs.
Tristan Lawrence wrote:
I'm not sure that would be a problem, though. As I recall (I wrote this
a while ago) the script collects all of the stats for a particular day;
it doesn't limit them at all. The filtering takes place when it outputs.
Well, Analog does filtering by default and the
Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
Well, Analog does filtering by default and the script doesn't 'turn off' the floors.
The default requests floor compiled in (admittedly I have an older
version of Analog) is only 20 requests, and as you noted below I
override the directory floor. Regardless, an excellent
analog
on cache files this big?
Fiorella
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [analog-help] Running Out Of Memory
I have attached a perl script I used to get around a similar problem
16 matches
Mail list logo
