Re: [analog-help] monthly reporting

- Original Message - From: "Julie S. Lin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 5:50 PM Subject: [analog-help] monthly reporting BlankHi I'm new to analog and got the daily reporting running great however, the monthly reports are just copies of the daily report Can so

[analog-help] [unresolved numerical addresses]

I am running IIS on windows 2000 Server and the latest Service Packs.  All extended properties are checked for logging. For some reason ALL hosts are unresolved as shown below... General Summary (Go To: Top | General Summary | Monthly Report | Daily Summary | Hourly Summary | Domain Rep

Re: [analog-help] [unresolved numerical addresses]

On Friday, January 07, 2005 8:52 AM [GMT], [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am running IIS on windows 2000 Server and the latest Service Packs. >> All extended properties are checked for logging. >> For some reason ALL hosts are unresolved as shown below... .. >> >> >> Listing

Re: [analog-help] [unresolved numerical addresses]

The log files already have the resolved names - the question is why is analog not using the hostnames in its report.   It appears to be ignoring the data in the log file.      Larry McElhinneywww.SuperLinks.com - Original Message - From: Aengus To: Support for analog web l

Re: [analog-help] [unresolved numerical addresses]

On Friday, January 07, 2005 10:09 AM [GMT], [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The log files already have the resolved names - the question is why >> is analog not using the hostnames in its report. Larry, the sample log entries that you supplied did NOT have resolved names. IIS does

[analog-help] Filetype Graphs

Hi there! Anyone knows if there is a possibility to limit the filetype graph to the top 10 entries but just the same show all entries in the table above? Thanks, Kai Kai Schwanke Sistemas y TI VOLKSWAGEN de México Organización y Sistemas de Información Tel. +52 (222) 230 7229

RE: [analog-help] monthly reporting

Hi no, i'll definetly take a look at it. thank you! :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 5:18 PM To: Support for analog web log analyzer Subject: Re: [analog-help] monthly reporting Have you

Re: [analog-help] 'OUTPUT COMPUTER' problems

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Gary Casterline wrote: > > This single log line produces the problem: > > fj5014.inktomisearch.com - - [01/Jan/2005:00:02:28 -0800] "GET > /robots.txt HTTP/1.0" 200 547 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! > Slurp; http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/slurp)" > > I'm using: > >

Re: [analog-help] COMPUTER OUTPUT further unrelated query

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Sean at IMAGINET wrote: > > Hello and Happy New Year :) > > Regarding the 'COMPUTER' flavoured output of Analog, could you confirm > whether the new version outputs REQALIASES when using this format or > whether these remain absent (not possible to achieve clickable human > rea

Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2005-01-06 15:11:46 -, Aengus wrote: > > The LOGTIMEOFFSET command is used to allow Analog to recalculate the > > GMT timestamps in your logfiles and display the times using your > > local timezone. > > LOGTIMEOFFSET is really annonying due to th

Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

On 2005-01-07 12:17:13 -0800, Stephen Turner wrote: > Not all logfiles report the timezone. Apache does. When the timezone is available, why not use it? > Even when they do, there is no standard way to retrieve the timezone > of the local machine You're wrong (well, in fact, at least for the tim

Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Now, you already have a > > #include > > (conditionally defined), so there should be nothing wrong to support > time-related POSIX functions when they are available. > There is no possibility that I'm going to add any more OS-dependent stuff. It's a

Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

On Friday 07 January 2005 05:24 pm, Stephen Turner wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Now, you already have a > > > > #include > > > > (conditionally defined), so there should be nothing wrong to support > > time-related POSIX functions when they are available. > > There is no

Re: [analog-help] Shift of time

On 2005-01-07 17:56:00 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > what's wrong with piping your log file through a little awk sript if > you're not happy with timestamps in there and want to massage them a > bit before processing? This is not my job to do this kind of things. > This way, if you want combined

Re: [analog-help] Filetype Graphs

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Schwanke, Kai wrote: > Hi there! > > Anyone knows if there is a possibility to limit the filetype graph to the > top 10 entries but just the same show all entries in the table above? > Is this a report magic question? If so, this is the wrong list. -- Stephen Turner, Cambrid