>> Cheers
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Justin Allen Jaynes
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Actually, it is off topi
om> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Actually, it is off topic and should not be here. Android-discuss
> would
> >>>>> be okay, though.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a DEVELPER forum. Pleas
ly, it is off topic and should not be here. Android-discuss
> would
> >>>>> be okay, though.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a DEVELPER forum. Please keep to DEVELOPMENT topic. A quote
> >>>>> from the official description of the forum
;>
>>>>> http://developer.android.com/community
>>>>>
>>>>> Sena Gbeckor-Kove wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Personally I don't think its an issue. I think it
;>>>
>>>> Sena Gbeckor-Kove wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Personally I don't think its an issue. I think it should stay in here
>>>>> and android-discuss unless there is already a place for it.
>>>>&
My apologies to the group for actually sending what was supposed to be
an off-list message to the list!
Cheers
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Stoyan Damov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
>> Justin,
>>
> ...
>>
>> Now, as this has gotten off topic, I'm sure you wouldn
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
> Justin,
>
...
>
> Now, as this has gotten off topic, I'm sure you wouldn't want to reply here,
> would you?
>
> Al.
: Made my day!
Cheers
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
on't
get this constant conflict-of-interest commentary on how bad the
Google system is...
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:38:49 +
From: a...@funkyandroid.com
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
x27;t
>>>> get this constant conflict-of-interest commentary on how bad the
>>>> Google system is...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:38:49 +
>>>>> From: a...@funkyandroid.com <mailto:a...@funk
nt conflict-of-interest commentary on how bad the
>>> Google system is...
>>>
>>> > Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:38:49 +
>>> > From: a...@funkyandroid.com <mailto:a...@funkyandroid.com>
>>> > To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
>>
nflict-of-interest commentary on how bad the
>> Google system is...
>>
>> > Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:38:49 +
>> > From: a...@funkyandroid.com <mailto:a...@funkyandroid.com>
>> > To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
>> <mailto:android-devel
p up your various ways to push Android forward...
> John Lauricella
>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:20:37 -0800
> > Subject: [android-developers] Re: (OT) Is the combination of Android
> Market and Google Checkout a joke?
> > From: paperga...@gmail.com
> > To: android-de
e the below...Sorry again,
and keep up your various ways to push Android forward...John Lauricella
> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:20:37 -0800
> Subject: [android-developers] Re: (OT) Is the combination of Android Market
> and Google Checkout a joke?
> From: paperga...@gmail.com
> To
rs@googlegroups.com
> > Subject: [android-developers] Re: (OT) Is the combination of Android Market
> > and Google Checkout a joke?
>
> > I'm getting more and more tempted to open up paid-for apps on
> > AndAppStore where all payments go directly to the develo
gt; Subject: [android-developers] Re: (OT) Is the combination of
> Android Market and Google Checkout a joke?
> >
> >
> > I'm getting more and more tempted to open up paid-for apps on
> > AndAppStore where all payments go directly to the developers
> account so
>
android.com
> To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [android-developers] Re: (OT) Is the combination of Android Market
> and Google Checkout a joke?
>
>
> I'm getting more and more tempted to open up paid-for apps on
> AndAppStore where all payments go
"...but I don't think most people see these products as consumables in the
same way you do"
Perhaps not. But I think this is what will keep the Android Market from
being as big as the iPhone App Store. For the most part, people don't go
into Game Stop, buy the newest Xbox 360 game on Friday, pla
I'm getting more and more tempted to open up paid-for apps on
AndAppStore where all payments go directly to the developers account so
they can set the T&Cs.
Would this be something people would be interested in?
Al.
Semprebon wrote:
> It would be nice if some other pricing models were availab
It would be nice if some other pricing models were available (for
example, subscriptions), but I just don't see a "no returns" or even a
"no returns after 1 hour" model being very popular with users. I may
be wrong, but I don't think most people see these products as
consumables in the same way yo
I'm really not looking forward to making any real money on Android, at
least not for some time to come.
"Once I finish my "US Weekly" within an hour, can I get a refund?"
Exactly. What about watching a movie that cost you $7.50? Do you get
a refund every time after watching it?
What about goi
I agree it would be great to have the user give more feedback on refunds: I
guess it needs to be balanced with the ease of use, and I hope that
appropriate folks in the Android team are looking at improving it. If you
have concrete suggestions, you should consider posting them on this forum or
file
Well, I don't think 3.4 applies to my case because my game does have a
free version, which the user can try before he decides whether to buy
or not.
Now, *frankly* I wouldn't mind the 48 hour period *that* much if at
least the user is asked for an explanation why he cancels his order.
This "Other"
Hi Stoyan,
You are right, your refund does seem to have happened after 24 hours.
As I understand section 3.4 of
http://www.android.com/us/developer-distribution-agreement.html
The developers agree to allow refunds with-in 48 hours, and buyers
have the option for the first 24 hours. May be you a
Now here's another NOT related to weekend sleeps:
Feb 22 1:46 PM Order received You received a new order. Google has
sent the customer an order confirmation email.
Feb 23 2:48 PM Order cancelled You cancelled this order.
Reason: Other (describe below)
Message sent to customer:
Let's see:
Feb 22 8:12 AM Order received You received a new order. Google has
sent the customer an order confirmation email.
Feb 23 12:58 PM Order cancelled You cancelled this order.
Reason: Other (describe below) <--- THIS IS MY FAVORITE,
there's nothing in the Market
Are you sure that the buyer can cancel the app after 24 hours? Not charged
does not mean that the buyer has the ability to cancel it.
Inder
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Stoyan Damov wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've got a customer who placed orders on 19th (Thursday) @ 9:46 PM
> PST, and he is st
On 2/23/09, Sundog wrote:
> The answer can't be "so write a different type of application".
> Certainly these are good strategies, but not suited to every kind of
> game; seeing that type of game disappear from the market is not a
> forward-thinking solution. Some people WANT these simple lit
The answer can't be "so write a different type of application".
Certainly these are good strategies, but not suited to every kind of
game; seeing that type of game disappear from the market is not a
forward-thinking solution. Some people WANT these simple little games.
On Feb 23, 9:36 am, Steve B
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Steve Barr wrote:
>
> On 2/23/09, Stoyan Damov wrote:
>> So if I'm a customer, I could buy, say[1], a game on Friday, play all
>> weekend and return it on Monday.
>>
>> Google has got to be joking.
>>
>> [1] Arcade games are more vulnerable to this WTF becaus
"So design games with replay value. Randomize things, periodically
release
downloadable levels, whatever. "
In my opinion, this is a completely bogus statement for most games/
applications developed on this platform (minus organizations such as
EA Sports, etc.). The G1 is not a PS3. If I purcha
On 2/23/09, Stoyan Damov wrote:
> So if I'm a customer, I could buy, say[1], a game on Friday, play all
> weekend and return it on Monday.
>
> Google has got to be joking.
>
> [1] Arcade games are more vulnerable to this WTF because you can
> literally play the entire game in 1 weekend unles
31 matches
Mail list logo
