After 1.5 is released officially, for how long do we have to support
for the
older versions? Also tell me how can we release two different versions
(one for 1.1 and other for 1.5) on the market?
I cant develop for the new version untill these issues are resolved.
On Apr 22, 8:50 pm, havexz wrot
After 1.5 is released officially, for how long do we have to support
for the
older versions? Also tell me how can we release two different versions
(one for 1.1 and other for 1.5) on the market?
I cant develop for the new version untill these issues are resolved.
On Apr 22, 8:50 pm, havexz wrot
Hi..I was very excited to see that 1.5 has come and also started using
that too. I have updated my old applications of 1.1 and then when i
try to run the emulator its taking forever to bootup and start. I have
been using the new SDK since yesterday but till now not been
successful in starting the
thanks Jasoni ll check that out but my question is still
unanswered
On Apr 21, 6:21 pm, Jason Proctor wrote:
> >But will the official release will work on the ADP1? One more question
> >after 1.5 is released officially, do we still have to support for the
> >older versions or all gphone owne
> It's not going to run on ADP1 as it lacks the proprietary files that
> are needed for that.
>
> JBQ
But will the official release will work on the ADP1? One more question
after 1.5 is released officially, do we still have to support for the
older versions or all gphone owners will have this upd
Xavier thanks a lot
Downloading
Looks like powerful.
On 4月14日, 上午7时30分, Xavier Ducrohet wrote:
> Hello developers!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the release of an early look of the Android 1.5 SDK.
>
> More information and download link
> at:http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/04/ge
>> 1. Home -> Menu -> Add -> Widgets ->Search ... then there will be 2
>> google search bar.
>
> I don't think anything restricts putting only 1 instance of a particular
> widget.
Yes, working as intended.
--
Jeff Sharkey
jshar...@android.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andy wrote:
>
> Hi, Xav
>
> It is very cool! thanks for keeping polishing ...
>
> Some bugs I found
> 1. Home -> Menu -> Add -> Widgets ->Search ... then there will be 2
> google search bar.
I don't think anything restricts putting only 1 instance of a particular
Hi, Xav
It is very cool! thanks for keeping polishing ...
Some bugs I found
1. Home -> Menu -> Add -> Widgets ->Search ... then there will be 2
google search bar.
2. Eclipse -> Emulator Control ->Input some Chinese text as SMS,
Android display ???. this is also happened on 1.1-r1
3. Setting -> L
Just another THANK YOU for making 1.5 available to developers BEFORE
the updates reach the handsets.
-sz.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email
I actually don't mind testing against 1.5 emulator image as long as
the .apk built by 1.1 target is fully compatible with the 1.1 sdk and
can be uploaded to the market. I actually do most of my testing on the
device itself (it is 1.1), and this way I would be able to easily test
against both SDK v
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Mariano Kamp wrote:
>
> It says in http://developer.android.com/sdk/preview/:
>
> >>SDK Known Issues
>
> No network access from emulator while running Android 1.1 target
>
> Applications can not access the network when running on an Android 1.1
> target in the emul
It says in http://developer.android.com/sdk/preview/:
>>SDK Known Issues
No network access from emulator while running Android 1.1 target
Applications can not access the network when running on an Android 1.1
target in the emulator included in the SDK.<<
So, you can develope for 1.1 and 1.5 as
Great news. That's two applications back in the development queue for
me!
On Apr 15, 12:07 pm, clark wrote:
> Either way, the early look SDK is allowing me to get raw audio from
> the phones mic and run it through an FFT. The test "notes" I was
> sending through are being analyzed by the FFT c
As the new Eclipse plugin (ADT 0.9) can target both 1.1 and 1.5 SDKs.
is it safe to use 1.1 target to build applications for 1.1 SDK that
can be distributed on the Market right now?
(It appears to work well so far with the only difference I found is
that the signed file (using Export Signed Applic
Sure, start testing your apps against the preview SDK. You can start
using new API features, as long as you're aware that the 1.5 API is
*not* finalized. Functionality could be added or removed and method
signatures may change.
Cheers,
Justin
Android Team @ Google
On Apr 15, 11:07 am, clark wro
> However, in the specific case of acquiring mic audio, there may be an
> Android
> engineer here that could confirm that this is going to be in the released
> platform,
> it's just that I don't know the answer.
Hmm, I sure hope that is a feature since it is listed as one of the
new features in t
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:48 AM, ppmoore wrote:
>
> Still a few rough edges to be fixed ;<)
>
> - Executing emulator -wipe-data does not work (it needs an "android
> virtual device" to be specified)
> I still don't know if this option is needed (probably yes, because
> running eclipse with the n
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:42 PM, clark wrote:
>
> > Since "firmware found on the upcoming HTC Sapphire" means absolutely
> nothing
> > to us (really), you'd better ask to the person who provided you this nice
> > piece of
> > software instead :-)
>
> Now when you say "us," are you referring to go
> Since "firmware found on the upcoming HTC Sapphire" means absolutely nothing
> to us (really), you'd better ask to the person who provided you this nice
> piece of
> software instead :-)
Now when you say "us," are you referring to google engineers, the
application developers or the community?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 20:11, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote:
>
> The latest cupcake source drop (done a few hours ago) matches the
> preview SDK. We're working to tag it. Note that this isn't release 1.5
> of Android, it's just a code drop that matches an official preview
> SDK.
>
> It's not going t
Still a few rough edges to be fixed ;<)
- Executing emulator -wipe-data does not work (it needs an "android
virtual device" to be specified)
I still don't know if this option is needed (probably yes, because
running eclipse with the new SDK
doesn't start the emulator).
- The release notes sta
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:56 PM, clark wrote:
>
> I recently flashed my phone with the firmware found on the upcoming
> HTC Saphire, which says it is version 1.5. Does anyone know if I will
> be able to try out the features from the 1.5 SDK with this phone? It
> would be great to test directly
Thanks a lot guys...
thousands of heartiest appreciation to all Android Engineers..
Nithin
On Apr 15, 2:56 am, clark wrote:
> I recently flashed my phone with the firmware found on the upcoming
> HTC Saphire, which says it is version 1.5. Does anyone know if I will
> be able to try out the fe
I recently flashed my phone with the firmware found on the upcoming
HTC Saphire, which says it is version 1.5. Does anyone know if I will
be able to try out the features from the 1.5 SDK with this phone? It
would be great to test directly on the hardware rather than use an
emulator.
Also, I am
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Al Sutton wrote:
>
> To Xav, Dave, JBQ, Dianne, Romain, and anyone else involved in getting this
> out there.
>
> THANK YOU.
>
> You may not literally get a thousand thank yous in your mail box, but it'll
> probably be said a thousand times in various ways by deve
Use android:minSdkVersion="3" in your manifest to say you require Cupcake
features. I can't help with uploading different versions of an app to
market.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Lorents wrote:
>
> Great news :) Thanks a lot!
>
> If I make a new app that use some of the new features in 1.
Great news,
It's good to be able to see what's coming before it gets to the
consumers but damn, it looks like this is not going to upgrade
smoothly. hey ho.
On Apr 14, 12:30 am, Xavier Ducrohet wrote:
> Hello developers!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the release of an early look of the Android 1.
Great news :) Thanks a lot!
If I make a new app that use some of the new features in 1.5 will it
be possible to make it available on the market for devices with 1.5
installed or higher? If so would it be possible to upload different
versions of my app targeting different versions?
Best regards
L
The latest cupcake source drop (done a few hours ago) matches the
preview SDK. We're working to tag it. Note that this isn't release 1.5
of Android, it's just a code drop that matches an official preview
SDK.
It's not going to run on ADP1 as it lacks the proprietary files that
are needed for that
Hi Xav.
Thanks!
But I have questions.
How can I build the same version by myself?
Is it based on Master branch? Or Cupcake?
Is it possible to build the same version for ADP1?
I think it would be better to create new branch to avoid issues like
"18 march" issue. As example "release1_5".
BR,
Vlad
On Apr 14, 2:30 am, Xavier Ducrohet wrote:
> Hello developers!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the release of an early look of the Android 1.5 SDK.
>
> More information and download link
> at:http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/04/getting-ready-for-andr...
Is ADP1 going to get official imag
Just found some of the feauters I've been looking for!
Many thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
Great news!
I had a lot of trouble installing the 1.1r1 Linux version on 64 bit
fedora 11 beta (and I think there is the same trouble for fedora 10
and other distros).
Is there any chance there will be a 64 bit package for linux?
I posted a short tutorial on
http://groups.google.com/group/andr
+1
Thank you guys
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Pd wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Al Sutton wrote:
> > To Xav, Dave, JBQ, Dianne, Romain, and anyone else involved in getting
> this
> > out there.
> >
> > THANK YOU.
> >
> > You may not literally get a thousand thank yous in your mail box, but
> it'll
> >
+1
Al Sutton wrote:
> To Xav, Dave, JBQ, Dianne, Romain, and anyone else involved in getting this
> out there.
>
> THANK YOU.
>
> You may not literally get a thousand thank yous in your mail box, but it'll
> probably be said a thousand times in various ways by developers around the
> world.
>
> A
To Xav, Dave, JBQ, Dianne, Romain, and anyone else involved in getting this
out there.
THANK YOU.
You may not literally get a thousand thank yous in your mail box, but it'll
probably be said a thousand times in various ways by developers around the
world.
Al.
---
* Written an Android App? - L
Sounds great.
The beauty of a sometimes not totally transparent process is that you can
get surprised ;-)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Xavier Ducrohet wrote:
>
> Hello developers!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the release of an early look of the Android 1.5
> SDK.
>
> More information and dow
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Jamie Williams wrote:
> im new at this so should i stay with 1.1 or move to 1.5
Stick to coding with 1.1 if you want to deploy to Market right now.
If you have an existing app, make it run on the emulator for 1.5 to
check that it will work against soon-to-be dev
im new at this so should i stay with 1.1 or move to 1.5
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Dianne Hackborn wrote:
> A major goal for releases since 1.0 is to not break existing applications
> that are using the official SDK. Some times there will be things that
> break, unintentionally, so you wil
A major goal for releases since 1.0 is to not break existing applications
that are using the official SDK. Some times there will be things that
break, unintentionally, so you will want to test against current builds, but
that should very much be the minority.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:09 PM, JP
OK - I was more looking beyond the release at hand and concerned about
the "real thing" coming out. How about the build(s) that the carrier
(s) deliver(s) to their customers eventually. Say their build is 1.5.x
only (to safe space). Such a scenario would be disaster as the apps
would be stuck in n
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:53 PM, JP wrote:
>
> Hey, thanks Xavier!
> I've read the blog but I am not clear re: backwards compatibility:
> Will apps currently built against 1.0 or 1.1 run on handsets released
> w/ 1.5, say the new keyboard-less devices? Or do we need to account
> for the changes i
Hey, thanks Xavier!
I've read the blog but I am not clear re: backwards compatibility:
Will apps currently built against 1.0 or 1.1 run on handsets released
w/ 1.5, say the new keyboard-less devices? Or do we need to account
for the changes in 1.5 and re-release? (This would be hell)
JP
On Apr
Holy!..
Much appreciated. Looks like we are getting heard.
Downloading.
Ivan Soto Fernandez
Web Developer
http://ivansotof.com
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Xavier Ducrohet wrote:
>
> Hello developers!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the release of an early look of the Android 1.5
> SDK.
>
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
