Thanks for the clear explanation. This is exactly what i needed!
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Streets Of Boston
wrote:
>
> You can not create a Collection. It is an interface, as other already
> pointed out.
>
> Judging from your other posts, i'd suggest your using an
> ArrayList.
> An ArrayL
You can not create a Collection. It is an interface, as other already
pointed out.
Judging from your other posts, i'd suggest your using an
ArrayList.
An ArrayList is basically some behavior around an array of objects (in
your case Car[]). Internally, it's using an array and it handles all
the in
Josh Dobbs wrote:
> Here's what my code looks like...
>
> *
>
> private
>
> * Collection __cars_;
>
> Car _myCar_=
>
> *new* Car(1,1,*false*,5, "blue");
>
> Car _myCar2_= *new* Car(1,1,*false*,5, "red");
>
> _cars.add(myCar);
> _cars.add(myCar2);
Collection is an interface, not a class.
also the reason i ldidnt use array is because i couldnt figure out how to
add objects to it. there is no add method:(.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Josh Dobbs wrote:
> I want to keep track of multiple instances of a class without hardcoding a
> bunch of variables. I can use either an array
I want to keep track of multiple instances of a class without hardcoding a
bunch of variables. I can use either an array or collection it doesnt really
matter to me but I cant seem to get either to work. I cant seem to find an
example of what I want to do anywhere. Im also open to suggestions if th
I don't understand what are you really asking? Whether arrays are
faster than collection classes? Yes, they are faster, but you have to
manage their contents (insertions, deletions, etc.) yourself.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Josh Dobbs wrote:
> Here's what my code looks like...
>
>
> priva
Here's what my code looks like...
*
private* Collection *_cars*;
Car *myCar*= *new* Car(1,1,*false*,5, "blue");
Car *myCar2*= *new* Car(1,1,*false*,5, "red");
_cars.add(myCar);
_cars.add(myCar2);
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Josh Dobbs wrote:
> >You mean like the ones in the java.util
>You mean like the ones in the java.util
Yes, specifically java.util.collection
>What's a VO?
A VO is basically a class that only contains properties(Value Objects).
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Mark Murphy wrote:
>
> Josh wrote:
> > I want to store objects into an array or collection(whic
Josh wrote:
> I want to store objects into an array or collection(whichever is best
> suited to this in dalvik).
You mean like the ones in the java.util package?
> the objects are basically just VO's all of
> the same class that i want to keep track of.
What's a VO?
--
Mark Murphy (a Common
9 matches
Mail list logo
