No decision has been made about where to put the EXIF libraries.
I'm not sure what version of EXIF spec is supported - the code is
available in the open source tree if you want to have a look. We do
support geo-tags and this is enabled in the camera application.
On Mar 11, 8:58 am, "chenyng2...@
Hi Dave,
Have we decided on this? Another quesion, which EXIF version does
Android support? do we support EXIF with location info?
Thanks,
Yong
On Jan 22, 7:09 pm, Dave Sparks wrote:
> Yes, I agree with that. My question is if we generalize it (and we
> can't really just remove it from Camer
Yes, I agree with that. My question is if we generalize it (and we
can't really just remove it from Camera because it's part of the
public API), where should it go in the framework?
I have my own ideas, but I'd like to hear other opinions.
On Jan 21, 5:45 pm, hanchao3c wrote:
> It seems the Cam
It seems the Camera/ExifInterface.java is only one usage of externel/
jhead.
On Jan 21, 9:42 pm, Formosalf wrote:
> There is no Java API for EXIF in current framework. It is inside Camera apk.
> Its native library already exists in externel/jhead, will it be better that
> we move Camera/ExifInte
Where do you propose to move it?
On Jan 21, 5:42 am, Formosalf wrote:
> There is no Java API for EXIF in current framework. It is inside Camera apk.
> Its native library already exists in externel/jhead, will it be better that
> we move Camera/ExifInterface.java to Android framework? Not inside
There is no Java API for EXIF in current framework. It is inside Camera apk.
Its native library already exists in externel/jhead, will it be better that
we move Camera/ExifInterface.java to Android framework? Not inside Camera
apk?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
