Sorry i had spell mistakes on my previous post. That is 750 MHz not GHz.
Android alone running in the ARM core , others are running an Intel core
with 2 GHz. But compare with MIPS rate both do not make big different know.
On Friday, October 19, 2012 12:16:30 PM UTC+5:30, Avtar Singh wrote:
> Actually we making Bio-Metric devices using Android
> Platform. There I've been using a algorithm for matching the templates.
> Here i have facing big challenge.
>
> In case of Linux (RedHat, Ubuntu) this algorithm gives
> milliseconds to compare 100 templates.
Thanks for quick reply ,
Actually we making Bio-Metric devices using Android
Platform. There I've been using a algorithm for matching the templates.
Here i have facing big challenge.
In case of Linux (RedHat, Ubuntu) this algorithm gives
milliseconds to co
> I know Android uses the Linux kernel. I hope the Android developers did
> some modification with original Linux Kernel, especially in standard C
> libraries. My question is whether the processing speed of Linux and Android
> kernel are the same or different. I did some tests in different OS like
I know Android uses the Linux kernel. I hope the Android developers did
some modification with original Linux Kernel, especially in standard C
libraries. My question is whether the processing speed of Linux and Android
kernel are the same or different. I did some tests in different OS like
wi
what made the adb to show the device in offline mode? Is that the problem
with adbd or adb itself?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:32 AM, guo0693 wrote:
> **
> If you can modify the hardware-make a serial port. Then you will be able
> to see the output since you push the power button. If system crashe
im not sure but maybe this will lead you in the right
direction--->http://elinux.org/Android_Build_System#Adding_a_new_program_to_build
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 5:26:49 AM UTC-7, Felipe Nipo wrote:
>
> Hi,
> someone have any experience with porting linux package, like "vim", "ntp",
> "gcc", a
Hi,
The compiler you can use is the one from Android NDK. It is documented how
to make a standalone tool chain. Then
1. set path to the tool chain
2. run 'configure --host=arm-linux-androideabi'
Please note the tool chain does not have separate libpthread library, all
pthread functions are in l
I'm curious if this has ever been tested on an android or otherwise mobile
open source device?
In theory it only benefits the user to simply replace pfifo_fast with
fq_codel.
However, since codel targets a 5ms lag window by default (and allows for
100ms bursts by default), I think it may need
