You should get a hold of a GIT repository instead.
On May 15, 7:59 am, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
Sigh. it is just impossible to upload android source code the google
code. I have tried different version of the svn but I can barely upload
the kernel directory. It always failed with
Ya ya in where (don't tell me github, it costs money)? I need not
only just a server but also a set of tools to manager the code
review/checking and bug tracking.
Anyway, I'm still trying to see if I can find some work around.
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 23:56 -0700, Androidphan wrote:
You
I have my own server 100mbps up/down, but I never created my own GIT
repository before.
On May 15, 9:00 am, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
Ya ya in where (don't tell me github, it costs money)? I need not
only just a server but also a set of tools to manager the code
review/checking and
I do have a server here, but I don't have the tools to manage the code
review/commit permission/bug tracking installed on it and I don't want
to spend time to install/manage them either. I just want to reuse the
nice features provided by google code.
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 00:09 -0700,
Sigh. it is just impossible to upload android source code the google
code. I have tried different version of the svn but I can barely upload
the kernel directory. It always failed with different errors.
I will have to find a server to host the source code.
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 10:39 +0530,
Hi,
Have anyone tried booting Android from NOR flash?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
unsubscribe: android-porting+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
website: http://groups.google.com/group/android-porting
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
x86/generic should be the major part of the whole project. Let's wait
for Chih-wei and others to give more comments.
Currently, I'm trying to upload a baseline tree to google code, but my
svn keep screws up. It is very hard to upload a large scale project.
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 19:00 -0700, adam
This seems to be a good idea to me to have a x86/generic structure.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
x86/generic should be the major part of the whole project. Let's wait
for Chih-wei and others to give more comments.
Currently, I'm trying to upload a
Hi Yang,
Actually we have tried. Yi and I have submitted some patches
(9494, 9496, 9497, 9749, 9779, 9782, ...)
but all of them are rejected, or just ignored.
I also tried to contact Dima Zavin, the original author of eee_701.
No response at all.
That makes me a little disappointed.
Though I'm
It's sad to see the response on those issues.
Would some one from google to give some comments here? How would the
effort in making android x86 be more efficient and appreciated by
Google? Thus it can be beneficial to all the people interested to run
Android on x86.
Thanks.
--
Chen
2009/5/11
My 2 cents inline.
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 02:03 -0700, Chih-Wei wrote:
On 5月10日, 上午4時08分, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
There are a few things planed in my mind for next:
1. a mail list for Eeepc/X86 issues only
I think android-porting list is just good for it.
Unless the topics are
They're pretty identical. Can you paste here an lspci?
On 9 Mag, 22:45, Kent Loobey k...@uoregon.edu wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2009 13:25:43 varadarajan narayanan wrote:
There are a few things planed in my mind for next:
1. a mail list for Eeepc/X86 issues only
2. a git server for
There's github.
I think that if we write good patches, correctly switched by system
properties or 'defines' at build time, we could place them in the
original code tree.
And make re-live the eee_701 vendor.
On 10 Mag, 04:42, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand, the svn server on
On Sunday 10 May 2009 04:13:56 Luca Belluccini wrote:
They're pretty identical. Can you paste here an lspci?
$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express Memory Controller
Hub (rev 03)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GME Express
For the ethernet, you can compile the driver in the kernel, it shall work.
For wireless, you may need some extra effort, you may try the
ndiswrapper approach. Don't know whether it now has some better
support in linux.
--
Chen
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Kent Loobey k...@uoregon.edu
Would you like to elaborate the issue with ALSA? Pre-link is just one
optional optimization, without it, it would still be functional.
--
Chen
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Luca Belluccini
lucabellucc...@gmail.com wrote:
I think a push could be ok, but all must be well switched, as I said.
On 5月9日, 上午1時38分, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
Confirmed following things:
1. it has to be the grub2 downloaded from the place mentioned in
Chih-wei's guide
Ah, yes.
The grub2 must have 915resolution module.
I don't know if the ubuntu version has this.
If you want to compile grub2 from
My wifi works very well (FYI-- you have to re-negotigth again after wake
up). And I did not do a lot special things other than following thins:
1. remove the - check in the WifiSevice.java as Michael's patch did,
2. Changed wifi.c, I did static link for my ath5k driver so I have to
remove
Well, I think we need some guidelines about how google plans to support
multi-platform and cpu archs. remember the question I sent out about how
to do the pre-load class change? The discussion did not get anywhere.
Now, we have more than that, we have battery service (Dianne has gave
some
How about submitting one or two patches to the specific project for
comments? Then we may have some base for the follow up. And once familar
with the process and considerations behind, we may update the patches and
hopefully to get them accepted by google. my 2 cents.
--
Chen
On Mon, May 11,
No, the one from ubuntu does not work at all
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 18:33 -0700, Chih-Wei wrote:
On 5月9日, 上午1時38分, Yi Sun beyo...@gmail.com wrote:
Confirmed following things:
1. it has to be the grub2 downloaded from the place mentioned in
Chih-wei's guide
Ah, yes.
The grub2 must have
I agree with you. and I did that already, I submitted some brain
damaged code to google ( the one like preload-class change) and hope to
initiate some discussions but it did not go too far. There are other
patches, like the alarm.c sent by someone else, it did not get into
anywhere either. Also,
This might not be the correct thread to ask this.. but.. Is it
possible for the patch-hosting-for-android-x86-support project to host
daily or even successful builds of android (maybe live usb images
also)? I have found android is on and off with successful builds at
times and someone who could
The best way would be SWITCHING TO GIT and trying to adapt continuosly
the code.
By the way, I ported a GPS USB Serial Device to Android on a Eee Pc.
Soon the full description.
By the way, good work for the vesa.
I'll keep my configuration until the 2.6.29 Kernel.
I tested both vesa and intelfb:
There are a few things planed in my mind for next:
1. a mail list for Eeepc/X86 issues only
2. a git server for Eeepc/x86 platforms.
Any other suggestions?
Yi
PS: with these patches so far, I can alway build and run the Android.
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 01:41 -0700, adam singer wrote:
This might
Ya, a git tree is a good idea, it is hard to manager a large set of
patches.
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 04:30 -0700, Luca Belluccini wrote:
The best way would be SWITCHING TO GIT and trying to adapt continuosly
the code.
By the way, I ported a GPS USB Serial Device to Android on a Eee Pc.
Soon the
I'm studying git to get that feature out. Stay tuned.
On 9 Mag, 22:45, Kent Loobey k...@uoregon.edu wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2009 13:25:43 varadarajan narayanan wrote:
There are a few things planed in my mind for next:
1. a mail list for Eeepc/X86 issues only
2. a git server for
Sorry,I only have a EeePC, I guess I can only workon what I have. But
you are more than welcome to give patches for the playform u have
On May 9, 2009, at 1:45 PM, Kent Loobey k...@uoregon.edu wrote:
On Saturday 09 May 2009 13:25:43 varadarajan narayanan wrote:
There are a few things
Confirmed following things:
1. it has to be the grub2 downloaded from the place mentioned in
Chih-wei's guide
2. intelfb works as well.
Yi
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:57 -0700, Yi Sun wrote:
Chih-wei,
is this a standard grub2 that can be download with apt-get from ubuntu?
Yi
On Fri, 2009-05-08
29 matches
Mail list logo
