Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Koen Kooi wrote: > This first batch of opie images is being uploaded by the 2007 autobuilder. Great, I see they have appeared (in unstable/autobuild/ for those who are unfamiliar with the Angstrom website structure as I was a short time ago). So should I copy these to unstab

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Matthias Hentges
Am Freitag, den 11.01.2008, 01:57 +0100 schrieb Koen Kooi: > There is no legitimate use/need for that. If people insist on 'One > Conffile To Rule Them All' they should also cat together /etc/init.d/* > for consistency. Of course there is a use and even a need for that: aqpkg. [...] > It has a

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Matthias Hentges
Hello Paul, Am Freitag, den 11.01.2008, 08:32 +1300 schrieb Paul Eggleton: > Koen Kooi wrote: > > +1 under one condition: remove the merge_feeds crap from opie image > > recipes. Opie has no business poking in operating system files that are > > under packagemanagement. As you fully know, these

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Sokolovsky schreef: | Hello Paul, | | Thursday, January 10, 2008, 1:10:05 PM, you wrote: | |> Hi there, | |> Attached is a patch to add Opie to the autobuilder script. It adds a separate |> block to build opie-image for just those machines that ar

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [oe] [RFC] Smallscreen mod for GtkFileChooser

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Michael, Thursday, January 10, 2008, 1:08:41 PM, you wrote: > Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >> I would >> like to raise the original proposal: to apply my patch, at least to >> Angstrom stable branch. >> Of course, I'd prefer .dev to keep in sync >> too, but if there're concerns that applying suc

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 01/11/2008 01:12 PM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > But don't forget to RFC it once you think stuff in .dev stabilized I just pushed a navit commit. Hope everything is in line now. I will let it sit for a couple days for me or CoreDump to test, then we will RFC for the stable branch. Regards Gor

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [oe] mtn disapprove

2008-01-11 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rolf Leggewie schreef: | It seems this solution is not yet perfect. All of the sudden, bitbake | cooks up an armv5te version of libogg for the collie. My suspicion is | that this has to do with PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS. | | What does PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS d

Re: [Angstrom-devel] Opie Machines

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Ian, Friday, January 11, 2008, 8:04:30 PM, you wrote: > I've just had a quick look at the patch file, and I am guessing Spitz will > not be a machine included in the Opie image builds, is this correct? > I was hoping to get Opie in test on my machine, but am having a break from > BitBake et

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Junqian, Friday, January 11, 2008, 8:48:55 PM, you wrote: > On 01/11/2008 07:38 AM, José Bernardo Bandos Rodrigues wrote: >> Another update proposal, navit - the default version doesn't build, the >> 0.0.3 version builds perfectly: > The navit package and speech-dispatch (speechd) have see

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread Junqian Gordon Xu
On 01/11/2008 07:38 AM, José Bernardo Bandos Rodrigues wrote: > Another update proposal, navit - the default version doesn't build, the > 0.0.3 version builds perfectly: The navit package and speech-dispatch (speechd) have seen quite a few PR bumps since the stable branch was tagged. Although 0.0

[Angstrom-devel] Opie Machines

2008-01-11 Thread Ian Bonham
I've just had a quick look at the patch file, and I am guessing Spitz will not be a machine included in the Opie image builds, is this correct? I was hoping to get Opie in test on my machine, but am having a break from BitBake et all at the moment, as getting a working environment I could build som

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread José Bernardo Bandos Rodrigues
Another update proposal, navit - the default version doesn't build, the 0.0.3 version builds perfectly: NOTE: Resolving missing task queue dependencies ERROR: No providers of runtime build target speechd (for ['/home/jbs/oe/org.openembedded.angstrom-2007.12-stable /packages/navit/navit_0.0.1.bb'])

[Angstrom-devel] Tosa status pages

2008-01-11 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
Hi, I've put few pages regarding my current efforts in cleaning up/merging upstream support for tosa (SL-6000). They are available at http://tosa.lumag.spb.ru/ As usual comments are welcome. -- With best wishes Dmitry ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mai

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread José Bernardo Bandos Rodrigues
Hello Koen Can notecase preferred version also be updated from 1.2.6 to 1.7.2? It builds and runs perfectly on my akita, using the stable branch. ___ Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list Angstrom-distro-devel@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Paul, Thursday, January 10, 2008, 1:10:05 PM, you wrote: > Hi there, > Attached is a patch to add Opie to the autobuilder script. It adds a separate > block to build opie-image for just those machines that are supported in Opie > at the moment. I know this is a lot of images to build, but

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: add opie-image to autobuilder

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Paul, Thursday, January 10, 2008, 9:32:11 PM, you wrote: [] > For now I am happy to just do as you say and rip out that stuff from > opie-image.bb. I will prepare a patch for that this weekend if nobody else > gets to it before me. Ok, I did ;-). Pushed. > Cheers, > Paul -- Best reg

Re: [Angstrom-devel] RFC: Update linux-rp 2.6.23 to latest rev and make it the default for poodle

2008-01-11 Thread Ashley J Gittins
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Richard Purdie wrote: > Whether it makes sense for angstrom stable, it isn't my place to say. I > can say that 2.6.17 is removed, I won't be touching it again and 2.6.23 > is the future though ;-). Hi Richard, Not sure if this is relevant but collie still requires 2.6.

Re: [Angstrom-devel] [Review] echo -e fixes

2008-01-11 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia piątek, 11 stycznia 2008, Koen Kooi napisał: > Various people are getting bitten by the 'echo -e' usage in e.g. > gpe-session scripts (the x11-keeps-crashing problems), so I'd like to > have a6a229a30536ec1d025937b05457059b0bf4b55d in the stable branch: > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail

Re: [Angstrom-devel] update to angstrom-2007-preferred-versions.inc

2008-01-11 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello Koen, Friday, January 11, 2008, 9:40:46 AM, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Rolf Leggewie schreef: > | Koen Kooi schrieb: |>> Sounds ok, +1 from me. > | > | c6c33aa5d673dccd6d19de32e40edd19565dbb5a it is, then. > Added to BACKPORTS.txt, it still needs an ACK

Re: [Angstrom-devel] QemuArm version of Angstrom stable (SOLVED)

2008-01-11 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fernando de Francisco schreef: | Finally, I've found how to avoid the crashing of GPE | | File /etc/matchbox/session | | Change line: | -e exec matchbox-window-manager -use_cursor yes $@ | to this one: | exec matchbox-window-manager -use_cursor yes $@

[Angstrom-devel] [Review] echo -e fixes

2008-01-11 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Various people are getting bitten by the 'echo -e' usage in e.g. gpe-session scripts (the x11-keeps-crashing problems), so I'd like to have a6a229a30536ec1d025937b05457059b0bf4b55d in the stable branch: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openem

Re: [Angstrom-devel] QemuArm version of Angstrom stable (SOLVED)

2008-01-11 Thread Fernando de Francisco
Finally, I've found how to avoid the crashing of GPE File /etc/matchbox/session Change line: -e exec matchbox-window-manager -use_cursor yes $@ to this one: exec matchbox-window-manager -use_cursor yes $@ and will work. I've not found what this '-e' does. If I'm wrong, please let me know Regar