On 09/20/2008 05:39 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote:
Il giorno gio, 18/09/2008 alle 21.32 -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
I'm going through this learning process myself right now and I've attached my
own cheat sheet. Spoiler alert: I haven't succeeded in building a working ROM
image
On 09/20/2008 11:42 AM, Thomas Kunze wrote:
Hi everybody,
I was wondering who is a member of the angstom team?
Koen only? Anyone with commit access to oe who wants to be an angstrom
member?
Who thinks himself as a member atm?
I'm asking because its not clear to me who has a vote on various
On 09/21/2008 02:53 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote:
Il giorno dom, 21/09/2008 alle 02.07 -0500, Junqian Gordon Xu ha
scritto:
On 09/20/2008 05:39 AM, Alessandro Pellizzari wrote:
sudo apt-get install gcc-3.4 (at least in Debian lenny)
as qemu needs gcc3 to compile. I only had gcc4
Bernhard Guillon wrote:
Bob Igo schrieb:
In my experience, the unofficial apt-gettable OE build instructions were
99% simpler, and 100% painless, when compared with the official build
instructions: http://blog.leggewie.org/?p=39 It's the only way I've
been able to build Angstrom.
This is a
On 09/20/2008 05:30 AM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote:
On 17:36 Wed 17 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote:
I've sketched a stable branch changelog page [1] to help with release
announcement and anxious users. Backporters: please add couple of lines
after you commit a change to the stable branch. It's
Bernhard Guillon wrote:
Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb:
I would suggest use a single page for now for all the discussion just
for simplicity. If there is enough demand, we can expand that to every
page.
I just found out that there is an add on for discussion pages [1] [2] :)
But this add on also
Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb:
The rotation is probably for different Z models (clamshell vs
portrait). Could you post or point to the code?
Here is the source
http://cvs.sourceforge.jp/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xqt/xqt2/xfree86/xqt-driver/qtscreen.cc?rev=1.1view=auto
best regard
Bernhard Guillon
On 09/21/2008 05:28 AM, Bernhard Guillon wrote:
Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb:
The rotation is probably for different Z models (clamshell vs
portrait). Could you post or point to the code?
Here is the source
Bernhard Guillon wrote:
Hi,
I now read the source of X/Qt a bit to debug its behaviour on my SIMpad
(screen resolution is switched). It is a hack for Zaurus and there are
some ifdefs for it.
I was not able to use it without QWS (the hacks for zaurus) at the
moment but I keep trying.
So I am
On Sunday 21 September 2008, you wrote:
Thinking outside the box for a moment: you could use qvfb[1] inside an
X11 session to run opie or opie apps.
Actually that's a great idea, perhaps someone could test it?
Cheers,
Paul
___
Angstrom-distro-devel
Hi,
Interest in initramfs images that make booting from different media
easier has picked up lately, so let's come up with a masterplan to
streamline development a bit.
Background:
Angstrom supports devices that have a relatively small internal storage
capacity making it hard for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
I guess I was unclear when I said:
Unsupported stuff has no place in documentation.
That means:
Unsupported stuff does NOT get mentioned in the documentation.
A solution to this would be to support the DEB-based build
Yuri Bushmelev schrieb:
2) Add support for your device to initramfs-kexecboot_1.0.bb by
supplying appropriate FBANGLE and INPUTDEV
AFAIK thesing considering to call kexecboot binary as init. So
FBANGLE/INPUTDEV should be detected somewhere inside kexecboot. E.g.
from /proc and /sys
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
To avoid confusion: Angstrom will never support a deb/rpm/whatever based
setup method. There's an overhaul scheduled for the angstrom
distrofiles, which will alter the way how various options are selected.
So people using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
What happens if you follow the current instructions in
http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom ?
I'm still installing Ubuntu on my spare machine, but in the meantime I
already noticed a problem with the instructions.
Bob Igo wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
What happens if you follow the current instructions in
http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom ?
I'm still installing Ubuntu on my spare machine, but in the meantime I
already noticed a problem with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
Either should be fine.
I appreciate you telling me that, but shouldn't the official build
instructions be corrected to show a consistent version?
- --
Bob Igo
StormLogic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
Bob Igo wrote:
Koen Kooi wrote:
I appreciate you telling me that, but shouldn't the official build
instructions be corrected to show a consistent version?
They already have been :)
Nearly :) I see that you updated the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
Indeed there is. Fixed! Thanks for spotting it. It works on my machine
because that those have both a 1.8.8 and 1.8.10 dir
No problem :) These are exactly the types of things I'd like to discover.
- --
Bob Igo
StormLogic
Koen Kooi schrieb:
That won't work. Unsupported stuff has no place in documentation. If
it doesn't work, it should be tracked down why it doesn't work and get
fixed.
I just set up another buildmachine following the instructions to the
letter, and it worked.
Ok, I started a temporary testing
Thomas Kunze wrote:
Yuri Bushmelev schrieb:
2) Add support for your device to initramfs-kexecboot_1.0.bb by
supplying appropriate FBANGLE and INPUTDEV
AFAIK thesing considering to call kexecboot binary as init. So
FBANGLE/INPUTDEV should be detected somewhere inside kexecboot. E.g.
from
Thomas Kunze schrieb:
Hi everybody,
I was wondering who is a member of the angstom team?
Koen only? Anyone with commit access to oe who wants to be an angstrom
member?
Who thinks himself as a member atm?
I'm asking because its not clear to me who has a vote on various
issues like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some other notes:
The source-me.txt contents aren't indented properly. Syntactically,
it's fine, but it might lead people to believe that
PATH=/OE/bitbake-1.8.10/bin:${ORG_PATH} and below should actually be
nested.
It's also not possible to copy
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote:
Actually, autobuilders are the gatekeepers for the feeds. If you add
something to the build-feeds.sh script the autobuilder will build and
upload it. A cronjob at the server runs the sorting script every 4 hours.
You can of course instruct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
More tidbits: Ultimately, people should run bitbake as regular users,
but the guide starts out with mkdir /OE which will only work via sudo
or otherwise as root. At the risk of someone becoming root and staying
root for the whole setup, why not
Op 21 sep 2008, om 21:48 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote:
Actually, autobuilders are the gatekeepers for the feeds. If you add
something to the build-feeds.sh script the autobuilder will build and
upload it. A cronjob at the server
Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi there,
Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds? Currently
it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has already
confused one user.
It lists the feeds in which the package is present, so I don't see a
reason not to
Bob Igo wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some other notes:
The source-me.txt contents aren't indented properly. Syntactically,
it's fine, but it might lead people to believe that
PATH=/OE/bitbake-1.8.10/bin:${ORG_PATH} and below should actually be
nested.
It's also not
Koen Kooi schrieb:
Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi there,
Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds?
Currently
it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has
already
confused one user.
It lists the feeds in which the package is present, so I don't see
On Sunday 21 September 2008, Koen Kooi wrote:
It lists the feeds in which the package is present, so I don't see a
reason not to include the feeds. Especially considering people are
actively using 2008.x images.
Ah right, I wasn't aware of that.
Cheers,
Paul
Hello,
I want to build Angstrom with my OpenSuse 10.3 (running in a Vmware).
I follow the instructions that are found here
http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom
1) I installed monotone
rpm -i monotone-0.41-3.1.i586.rpm
2)I want to do
linux:/OE # mtn --db=OE.mtn pull
Bernhard Guillon wrote:
Koen Kooi schrieb:
Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi there,
Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds?
Currently
it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has
already
confused one user.
It lists the feeds in which the package is
Hi,
What would be a good time to bump to r19 and upload them for testing? I
guess the opie dudes get to pick the date since they are doing most of
the work for 2007.12 nowadays :)
regards,
Koen
___
Angstrom-distro-devel mailing list
On 05:16 Sun 21 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote:
On 09/20/2008 05:30 AM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote:
On 17:36 Wed 17 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote:
[]
Good idea, especially in part of package requests for next stable
release. I've added leafpad to list of tested programs - I'm using it
On 09/21/2008 03:37 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
What would be a good time to bump to r19 and upload them for testing? I
guess the opie dudes get to pick the date since they are doing most of
the work for 2007.12 nowadays :)
blueligthing and I think Sep/29 (before the opie 1.2.4 release,
Javier Grijalba schrieb:
Hello,
I want to build Angstrom with my OpenSuse 10.3 (running in a Vmware).
I follow the instructions that are found here
http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom
1) I installed monotone
rpm -i monotone-0.41-3.1.i586.rpm
2)I want to do
linux:/OE # mtn
On 09/21/2008 07:09 AM, Maurizio Rottin wrote:
i just wanted to point out that version 1.9.6 compiles fine and maybe
should be added in the OE packages three.
I was not looking for a solution, i was proposing solution ;)
1.9.6 pushed in d2682ccdf4be68f6b1b181b6a06003be2cc4122c
fakeroot
Hi Thomas,
thank you, I did a
mtn db migrate --db=OE.mtn
afterwards this
mtn --db=/OE/OE.mtn pull monotone.openembedded.org
org.openembedded.{stable,dev}
and now I must wait ... :-)
Javier
Thomas Kunze schrieb:
Javier Grijalba schrieb:
Hello,
I want to build Angstrom with my OpenSuse
On 09/21/2008 03:15 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Bernhard Guillon wrote:
Koen Kooi schrieb:
Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi there,
Would it be possible to restrict the feed browser to released feeds?
Currently
it is listing packages from 2008.6 as well as 2007.12 and that has
already
confused one user.
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Artamonow wrote:
In fact it would be much nicer not to use /OE at all.
We can use something like ${HOME}/OE, so we won't need any
`su` or `chown` anymore.
Personally I have my OE set up exactly this way.
I think that'd be fine, too, as
On 09/21/2008 05:05 AM, Bernhard Guillon wrote:
Junqian Gordon Xu schrieb:
I would suggest use a single page for now for all the discussion just
for simplicity. If there is enough demand, we can expand that to every
page.
I just found out that there is an add on for discussion pages [1]
Bernhard Guillon schrieb:
Now, please explain to me why building-angstrom is now duplicated in
a wikipage and why the wiki page shouldn't get deleted.
Well I got it wrong. I thought you tested the apt-get stuff and found
it working fine.
I started the wiki page one day before because you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Kooi wrote:
What happens if you follow the current instructions in
http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom ? Is it still
broken?
Finally finished building all I could. Building base-image and
console-image for the hx4700
Playing with .stable branch recently I found that it doesn't updates
for me anymore and I don't get recent commits via monotone. Doing
mtn pull; mtn update shows this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/OE/org.openembedded.stable $ mtn pull ; mtn update
mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need
On 09/21/2008 03:54 PM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote:
On 05:16 Sun 21 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote:
On 09/20/2008 05:30 AM, Dmitry Artamonow wrote:
On 17:36 Wed 17 Sep , Junqian Gordon Xu wrote:
[]
Good idea, especially in part of package requests for next stable
release. I've added
45 matches
Mail list logo
